TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Prudie: "Unequal" Childcare


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
RE: Dear Prudie: "Unequal" Childcare
Permalink  
 


Our churches do part time "daycare". But it's not called daycare. It's called a Parents Day Out. It's usually three mornings a week.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

Too much emphasis is put on "chain" daycares or whatever.

Likely, some neighbor down the street could have her own daycare and do as good or better of a job--and cheaper. Both my sister and one SIL had daycares at one point and neither ever had any complaints.


 There are pros and cons to both.  Having a private in-home daycare is preferable for the personal touch, but then you have to scramble when that person gets sick, or they need a day off, or they go on vacation.  And many of them are just babysitters - they don't do enrichment and learning.  A dedicated daycare center is held to higher standards with licensing requirements, usually has a learning curriculum in place, and doesn't close except for holidays. 


   I tried using a private person whom was a nurse from the hospital and she had small kids.  But, she then started to cancel for stupid crap.  So, forget it.  ANd, honestly, i felt better with my kids at the local daycare, where i knew the owner pretty well and there were a lot of adults around.  Who knows what is going on in someone's home, you really don't know.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1469
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

Too much emphasis is put on "chain" daycares or whatever.

Likely, some neighbor down the street could have her own daycare and do as good or better of a job--and cheaper. Both my sister and one SIL had daycares at one point and neither ever had any complaints.


 There are pros and cons to both.  Having a private in-home daycare is preferable for the personal touch, but then you have to scramble when that person gets sick, or they need a day off, or they go on vacation.  And many of them are just babysitters - they don't do enrichment and learning.  A dedicated daycare center is held to higher standards with licensing requirements, usually has a learning curriculum in place, and doesn't close except for holidays. 


   I tried using a private person whom was a nurse from the hospital and she had small kids.  But, she then started to cancel for stupid crap.  So, forget it.  ANd, honestly, i felt better with my kids at the local daycare, where i knew the owner pretty well and there were a lot of adults around.  Who knows what is going on in someone's home, you really don't know.


 Home daycare's are suppose to be licensed unless they are doing it under the table.

I'm in a home daycare, but its fully licensed and she has  paid helpers and a full curriculum.  The daycare space is separated from her living areas.



__________________
Just suck it up and get on with it.


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Same here. It makes sense, since daycares have strict ratios.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Yes, lots of people babysit and take in an extra kid or two.  Mostly moms staying at home with their own kids.  They don't need to be licensed to do that.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18709
Date:
Permalink  
 

When we were little my mother took in the next door neighbor's kids because the mom worked. We were all around the same age, so we had someone to play with. My mom got paid for keeping the two girls during the day. It was a win-win.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Same here. It makes sense, since daycares have strict ratios.

flan


 In SD the ratio for a licensed home daycare is one adult to 12 (yes 12!) kids. The ratios are much stricter at daycare centers. 

 

Spoiler



-- Edited by NAOW on Thursday 7th of January 2016 12:09:31 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Same here. It makes sense, since daycares have strict ratios.

flan


 In SD the ratio for a licensed home daycare is one adult to 12 (yes 12!) kids. The ratios are much stricter at daycare centers. 

 

Spoiler



-- Edited by NAOW on Thursday 7th of January 2016 12:09:31 PM


I don't think that is unreasonable.   



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Same here. It makes sense, since daycares have strict ratios.

flan


 In SD the ratio for a licensed home daycare is one adult to 12 (yes 12!) kids. The ratios are much stricter at daycare centers. 

 

Spoiler



-- Edited by NAOW on Thursday 7th of January 2016 12:09:31 PM


I don't think that is unreasonable.   


 Wow. I would not feel comfortable with an infant or toddler being cared for by someone who had 11 other kids to look after by themselves. People talk about home daycares for the personal touch, but there is no way that provider will have time to rock or snuggle a small child with that many children to look after. 

 



__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah - no way I'd do a home daycare with more than 5-6 kids. And those would have to not be all little ones, otherwise, no more than 4.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Same here. It makes sense, since daycares have strict ratios.

flan


 In SD the ratio for a licensed home daycare is one adult to 12 (yes 12!) kids. The ratios are much stricter at daycare centers. 

 

Spoiler



-- Edited by NAOW on Thursday 7th of January 2016 12:09:31 PM


I don't think that is unreasonable.   


 Wow. I would not feel comfortable with an infant or toddler being cared for by someone who had 11 other kids to look after by themselves. People talk about home daycares for the personal touch, but there is no way that provider will have time to rock or snuggle a small child with that many children to look after. 

 


 A pre-school teacher might have more than that in their class.  They aren't all infants, either.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I will ask Caitlyn what their ratios are for where she works.

But I know she has had as many as 14 toddlers, 12-24 months, at one time.

She usually has 10-12 on any given day.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

In most states, the type of daycare makes NO difference as to the allowable ratio of kids.

NAOW says they are different in her state, but didn't post what they were.  I rather doubt that is the case.  Even if it is, that would be an exception.



-- Edited by huskerbb on Friday 8th of January 2016 09:40:09 AM



-- Edited by huskerbb on Friday 8th of January 2016 09:42:01 AM

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

In most states, the type of daycare makes NO difference as to the allowable ratio of kids.

NAOW says they are different in her state, but didn't post what they were.  I rather doubt that is the case.  Even if it is, that would be an exception.



-- Edited by huskerbb on Friday 8th of January 2016 09:40:09 AM



-- Edited by huskerbb on Friday 8th of January 2016 09:42:01 AM


 That isn't even true in your own state.  For Nebraska -

 Worker Qualifications
Staff: Must be "legal age of majority" and have a written, department-approved plan to acquire at least 3 credit hours or 15 clock hours of Department-approved in-service training in child development/early childhood education or child care administration within 12 months of hiring; or a CDA; or a bachelor's or associate's degree in a field related to care and education of children ages 0 - 12 years (e.g., early childhood education, child development, elementary education, or special education); or one year verified group experience with a positive reference from a supervisor.

Provider /Child Ratio

Age RangeRatios for Center Based Care in Nebraska State
Infants(1:4)
Toddlers(1:6)
Preschool (3 years)(1:10)
Preschool (4 - 5 years)(1:12)
Schoolage(1:15)
Mixed age groupcenter wide ratio count
Age RangeRatios for Family Child Care in Nebraska State
Infants(1:4)
All ages(1:8) includes provider's own children under 8 years old; no more than 2 children may be under 18 months old; additionally, there may be 2 school age children during non-school hours
Mixed age group(1:8) no more than 2 infants at one time
Schoolage(1:10)
 

 

 

 

It's also not true in "most" other states.  Here ya go - you can check it for yourself. 

https://daycare.com/states.html

 

 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

But that proves my point. They are actually HIGHER in the day care centers than in home.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

South Dakota -

Worker Qualifications
Teacher: Must be at least 18 years old and have a bachelor's in fields of education or human development and at least 2 years experience in child care; or a bachelor's in elementary education and at least 2 years experience in child care; or a bachelor's in elementary education if working only with school-age children; or a bachelor's in early childhood education; or and associate's in early childhood development; or certification as a Child Development Associate; or certification in Montessori teacher training program and at least 1 year experience in a Montessori school or child care setting; or a child development technician diploma; or at least 5 years supervised experience in a child care center; or a prekindergarten teacher endorsement.

Provider /Child Ratio

Age RangeRatios for Center Based Care in South Dakota State
Infants(1:5)
Toddlers (up to 3 years)(1:5)
Preschool (3 - 6 years)(1:10)
Schoolage(1:15)
Mixed age groupaccording to number in each group
Age RangeRatios for Family Child Care in South Dakota State
All ages

(1:12) with no more than 4 children under the age of 2 years and no more than 2 of those 4 can be under the age of 1; provider's children under the age of 6 must be counted




__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

But that proves my point. They are actually HIGHER in the day care centers than in home.


 Home daycares have different ranges of children where a daycare center divides them by age.  And you are assuming the home daycares all bother to follow the rules or get licensed. 

 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

But that proves my point. They are actually HIGHER in the day care centers than in home.


 What point is that, exactly?



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

But that proves my point. They are actually HIGHER in the day care centers than in home.


 What point is that, exactly?


 The point that was being made is that day care centers had lower ratios.  That's not true, at least not in all cases--and that's using your information.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

But that proves my point. They are actually HIGHER in the day care centers than in home.


 What point is that, exactly?


 The point that was being made is that day care centers had lower ratios.  That's not true, at least not in all cases--and that's using your information.


 Daycare ratios are more SPECIFIC as related to how many children and age. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Um, ok.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Here there are laws that say you can have a certain number of kids in your house on a daily basis without a license. Once you exceed that you have to get a license. But you can be openly baby sitting as long as you don't exceed the limit.


 Same here. It makes sense, since daycares have strict ratios.

flan


 In SD the ratio for a licensed home daycare is one adult to 12 (yes 12!) kids. The ratios are much stricter at daycare centers. 

 

Spoiler



-- Edited by NAOW on Thursday 7th of January 2016 12:09:31 PM


I don't think that is unreasonable.   


 Wow. I would not feel comfortable with an infant or toddler being cared for by someone who had 11 other kids to look after by themselves. People talk about home daycares for the personal touch, but there is no way that provider will have time to rock or snuggle a small child with that many children to look after. 

 


 A pre-school teacher might have more than that in their class.  They aren't all infants, either.


 Here if a preschool teacher has more than 10, there must be another adult in the room.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

But that proves my point. They are actually HIGHER in the day care centers than in home.


 What point is that, exactly?


 The point that was being made is that day care centers had lower ratios.  That's not true, at least not in all cases--and that's using your information.


 1:5 infants

1:5 toddlers

1:10 preschool

1:15 school age

..sure looks like lower ratios to me.

 

 

 

 

 

 



__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

Yeah - no way I'd do a home daycare with more than 5-6 kids. And those would have to not be all little ones, otherwise, no more than 4.


 Yea,  home day care providers I personally know, will not take more than 8 even though they are allowed to take more.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

FNW wrote:

When we were little my mother took in the next door neighbor's kids because the mom worked. We were all around the same age, so we had someone to play with. My mom got paid for keeping the two girls during the day. It was a win-win.


My mother took in Killer Kowalski.

He rented a room from us to stay in when he wrestled in Montreal.



__________________


Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

My MIL watched DD when she was small. While we desperately needed it, I would never do it again. It didn't cause hurt feelings with my parents - they we're smart enough to realize the person who saw her more often would be favored. But my MIL was a total idiot about it. She basically told us that since she was watching DD for free, we had no say in what rules she had or what she let DD do. It was awful. She let her eat Fritos for breakfast once on the grounds it was the same stuff as Corn Pops. I even provided breakfast for her and she fed her what she wanted just to be defiant. It was awful. Of course my MIL is mentally ill and we no longer have contact...but it still creates drama where you don't need any.

__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

This is all part of the "everyone has to be fair" culture we live in today.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou

«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard