TOTALLY GEEKED!

Ohfour · Hooker

RE: My day just got SO much better

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.

The participant who loves it the most and gets the most excited about it. And you can tell by her lack of excitement that it did dampen the whole thing for her.

I just don't get it. NOT AT ALL. What kind of person does that?

Blankie · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!

Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.

Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.

It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.

Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

Blankie · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.
It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.

I'm questioning this because I think you are a bit over the top on this one. Telling people how to deliver a thank you is extreme.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.

Oh noes!

You could call me a name again? That helped last time.

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.
It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.
I'm questioning this because I think you are a bit over the top on this one. Telling people how to deliver a thank you is extreme.

Why do you think Blankie rarely posts? She is one of the gentlest souls I have ever met.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

flan327 wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.
Oh noes!
You could call me a name again? That helped last time.
flan

Nah, i made my point. And if not posting on the SS thread left any doubt, this thread confirmed it...

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?

You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

So, because NJN & I have resolved our differences, she now deserves to be attacked. Got it.

flan

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.
It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.
I'm questioning this because I think you are a bit over the top on this one. Telling people how to deliver a thank you is extreme.

Too bad. You are not involved in SS so it's none of your business. flan didn't open her gift for ages even when asked about it and then failed to thank her gifter on the SS thread. It's basic etiquette and common courtesy. Which I realize is lost on some. But to REFUSE to post about one gift and then start a whole thread about a different one? That's just crappy and mean.

And I call it how I see it. Too bad if you don't agree. But how ANYONE can think that behavior is ok is absolutely astounding. No wonder the world is going to hell in a handbasket.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lawyerlady wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.
The participant who loves it the most and gets the most excited about it. And you can tell by her lack of excitement that it did dampen the whole thing for her.
I just don't get it. NOT AT ALL. What kind of person does that?

You've already stated your opinion.

And if you weren't a Mod, you would have gotten a warning.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

Are you slow? She jumped me for "ruining" "her" thread, yet felt the need to post on my bday thread negatively.

Get it now?

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
So, because NJN & I have resolved our differences, she now deserves to be attacked. Got it.

flan

*eyeroll* Yeah, that's it (heavy, HEAVY sarcasm).

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.
The participant who loves it the most and gets the most excited about it. And you can tell by her lack of excitement that it did dampen the whole thing for her.
I just don't get it. NOT AT ALL. What kind of person does that?
You've already stated your opinion.
And if you weren't a Mod, you would have gotten a warning.
flan

For what?

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?
You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?

Like MM said. This thread was going along nicely until ohfour had to come in and taunt flan. Everyone complains about flan and me taunting and picking on TD and Lily. But ohfour came in for no other reason than to stir things up. So that makes her no better than us. I'm sure you don't see it that way though. My air is fine thank you.

Ohfour · Hooker

Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.
It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.
I'm questioning this because I think you are a bit over the top on this one. Telling people how to deliver a thank you is extreme.
Too bad. You are not involved in SS so it's none of your business. flan didn't open her gift for ages even when asked about it and then failed to thank her gifter on the SS thread. It's basic etiquette and common courtesy. Which I realize is lost on some. But to REFUSE to post about one gift and then start a whole thread about a different one? That's just crappy and mean.
And I call it how I see it. Too bad if you don't agree. But how ANYONE can think that behavior is ok is absolutely astounding. No wonder the world is going to hell in a handbasket.

It looks as if Flan appreciates and likes NJNs gift, but not Tigs. That breaks my heart and is the ULTIMATE height of rudeness..

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Ohfour wrote:
Are you slow? She jumped me for "ruining" "her" thread, yet felt the need to post on my bday thread negatively.

Get it now?

Well then, I guess you were successful in dragging this one down. Happy now?

Ohfour · Hooker

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?
You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?
Like MM said. This thread was going along nicely until ohfour had to come in and taunt flan. Everyone complains about flan and me taunting and picking on TD and Lily. But ohfour came in for no other reason than to stir things up. So that makes her no better than us. I'm sure you don't see it that way though. My air is fine thank you.

Like you and flan did on my bday thread? Honey, you need a reality check...

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.
The participant who loves it the most and gets the most excited about it. And you can tell by her lack of excitement that it did dampen the whole thing for her.
I just don't get it. NOT AT ALL. What kind of person does that?
You've already stated your opinion.
And if you weren't a Mod, you would have gotten a warning.
flan
For what?

This:

You don't care about anyone but yourself.

Nasty & uncalled for.

flan

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?
You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?
Like MM said. This thread was going along nicely until ohfour had to come in and taunt flan. Everyone complains about flan and me taunting and picking on TD and Lily. But ohfour came in for no other reason than to stir things up. So that makes her no better than us. I'm sure you don't see it that way though. My air is fine thank you.

flan should not have started this thread. I knew it the moment I saw it.

Tinydancer · Guru

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?
You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?
Like MM said. This thread was going along nicely until ohfour had to come in and taunt flan. Everyone complains about flan and me taunting and picking on TD and Lily. But ohfour came in for no other reason than to stir things up. So that makes her no better than us. I'm sure you don't see it that way though. My air is fine thank you.

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.

Ohfour · Hooker

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Are you slow? She jumped me for "ruining" "her" thread, yet felt the need to post on my bday thread negatively.

Get it now?
Well then, I guess you were successful in dragging this one down. Happy now?

Boo hoo...sorry i brought your pat on the back thread down. Im sure your ego hasnt been hurt...

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.
It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.
I'm questioning this because I think you are a bit over the top on this one. Telling people how to deliver a thank you is extreme.
Too bad. You are not involved in SS so it's none of your business. flan didn't open her gift for ages even when asked about it and then failed to thank her gifter on the SS thread. It's basic etiquette and common courtesy. Which I realize is lost on some. But to REFUSE to post about one gift and then start a whole thread about a different one? That's just crappy and mean.
And I call it how I see it. Too bad if you don't agree. But how ANYONE can think that behavior is ok is absolutely astounding. No wonder the world is going to hell in a handbasket.
It looks as if Flan appreciates and likes NJNs gift, but not Tigs. That breaks my heart and is the ULTIMATE height of rudeness..

Can you READ?

You don't deserve to know what Tig got me.

flan

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
And one of the participants has yet to be acknowledged.
The participant who loves it the most and gets the most excited about it. And you can tell by her lack of excitement that it did dampen the whole thing for her.
I just don't get it. NOT AT ALL. What kind of person does that?
You've already stated your opinion.
And if you weren't a Mod, you would have gotten a warning.
flan
For what?
This:
You don't care about anyone but yourself.
Nasty & uncalled for.
flan

LOL. Truth hurt?

That wouldn't get anyone banned. Or even a warning. Try throwing that mod thing in my face again, though, and see how that goes for you.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Ohfour wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?
You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?
Like MM said. This thread was going along nicely until ohfour had to come in and taunt flan. Everyone complains about flan and me taunting and picking on TD and Lily. But ohfour came in for no other reason than to stir things up. So that makes her no better than us. I'm sure you don't see it that way though. My air is fine thank you.
Like you and flan did on my bday thread? Honey, you need a reality check...

Really? You came on this thread to talk about how this thread was full of nastiness? I said on your thread I didn't miss the bitching. That's all. You came in for the same reason? To tell us there was too much bitching going on on this thread?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Blankie wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
So it was Tig's fault you were getting nagged? That was why you thought it was ok to be rude to her?
She wasn't being nagged. Nobody said a cross word about it until it was obvious she wasn't going to bother to post. That's just an excuse. She should have opened it and posted a thank you. Whatever she says now is too little too late.
THEN why even bring it up? I've already been convicted.
Just because YOU (general) don't like the way I acted doesn't mean that I was rude to Tig. You know nothing about our relationship.
flan
By not posting at all - you were rude. By not responding when simply asked about it - you were rude. By continuing to post on the secret santa thread after you should have said thank you - you were rude. And then to COMPOUND the rudeness by starting an entire thread thanking someone for a different gift is unbelievable. It says that NJN is worthy of a public thank you, but Tig is not. You should have thanked NJN privately as well, IMO since you couldn't be bothered to post to Tig even when she asked.
And REGARDLESS of your "relationship" with Tig - you should have completed your secret santa by posting a thank you for the gift.

LL, if a public thank you on the Reveal thread is required, perhaps you should put that in the rules for next year. The TG Secret Santa 2015 rules say nothing about posting a public thank you. I don't get how it was rude that flan thanked Tig privately. Why must it be public? Seems rather ridiculous to dictate how people deliver their thank yous. But if you insist on it, then put it in the rules!
Kind of a killjoy for the whole Secret Santa thing.
It shouldn't have to be in the rules. We do a reveal thread that people get excited about. That is part of Secret Santa - it should go without saying. Good grief, really?

And why is it that so many of your posts question the rules and banning around here? You rarely contribute to anything else and simply want to question me.
I'm questioning this because I think you are a bit over the top on this one. Telling people how to deliver a thank you is extreme.
Too bad. You are not involved in SS so it's none of your business. flan didn't open her gift for ages even when asked about it and then failed to thank her gifter on the SS thread. It's basic etiquette and common courtesy. Which I realize is lost on some. But to REFUSE to post about one gift and then start a whole thread about a different one? That's just crappy and mean.
And I call it how I see it. Too bad if you don't agree. But how ANYONE can think that behavior is ok is absolutely astounding. No wonder the world is going to hell in a handbasket.

Showing your true colors...

flan

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Where did I play innocent? I admitted I sometimes take place in the fighting. I don't exactly think that's playing innocent. My statement is that I TRY MY BEST NOT TO. I mean now you know it's okay to pile on me so go right ahead. Say whatever you want about me. I honestly, at this point, truly don't care. I have a lot bigger things to worry about.
"I didn't try to ruin ohfour's birthday thread".

BULL.
Alright. Since you and ohfour seem intent on ganging up on me feel free. Go ahead and call me whatever names you want. I'm really tired of hearing what a wretched person I am. And feel free to say "Well you said it best." or something along those lines. Call me whatever you want. Accuse me of whatever you want. I'm way past caring.
Wah wah. Nobody called you any names. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
I didn't call anyone names. So saying I don't like bickering is name calling?
You just accused people of calling you names. And you did not have to be involved in any of this at all. You jumped into this against ohfour when she was commenting on flan - not YOU. You are the one that tried to derail ohfour's birthday thread with nastiness, and you are arguing here as much as anyone. That is what is meant by you can dish it out but you can't take. How's the air up on that horse?
Like MM said. This thread was going along nicely until ohfour had to come in and taunt flan. Everyone complains about flan and me taunting and picking on TD and Lily. But ohfour came in for no other reason than to stir things up. So that makes her no better than us. I'm sure you don't see it that way though. My air is fine thank you.
Like you and flan did on my bday thread? Honey, you need a reality check...
Really? You came on this thread to talk about how this thread was full of nastiness? I said on your thread I didn't miss the bitching. That's all. You came in for the same reason? To tell us there was too much bitching going on on this thread?

She came on here hoping it was a long overdue thank you to Tig.

But we don't DESERVE to know what Tig got her. WTF????

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Tinydancer wrote:

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.

No honey, my **** stinks just as much as the next persons. And you are the queen of rude comments.

Ohfour · Hooker

Go back and read. I didnt say one thing about bitching. I said i hoped it was started for a different reason. Now youre making things up?

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Ohfour wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Are you slow? She jumped me for "ruining" "her" thread, yet felt the need to post on my bday thread negatively.

Get it now?
Well then, I guess you were successful in dragging this one down. Happy now?
Boo hoo...sorry i brought your pat on the back thread down. Im sure your ego hasnt been hurt...

My ego is fine. Really. It is sad what things have come to.

Tinydancer · Guru

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.
No honey, my **** stinks just as much as the next persons. And you are the queen of rude comments.

And you'd like to believe you're not. Try owning your own nastiness before you worry about mine honey...

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

You two are quite funny. Keep trying to turn this around. I know two things clearly -

flan couldn't be bothered to acknowledge Tig's SS gift on the SS thread, and

NJN felt the need to get a dig in at ohfour on her birthday thread.

And now, they are both trying to deny the nastiness of those things and try to make others out to be the bad guy. Read my signature line.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Tinydancer wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.
No honey, my **** stinks just as much as the next persons. And you are the queen of rude comments.
And you'd like to believe you're not. Try owning your own nastiness before you worry about mine honey...

Show me one place where I have denied that I lose my temper? All I have said from the first minute is that I try not to. That I TRY to stay out of things. YOU are the one that keeps saying I won't admit that.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lawyerlady wrote:
You two are quite funny. Keep trying to turn this around. I know two things clearly -

flan couldn't be bothered to acknowledge Tig's SS gift on the SS thread, and

NJN felt the need to get a dig in at ohfour on her birthday thread.

And now, they are both trying to deny the nastiness of those things and try to make others out to be the bad guy. Read my signature line.

I said, I hate the bickering. Word for word. Which this thread has now become. I have owned my comment on ohfours birthday thread. Show me where I deny it.

Tinydancer · Guru

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.
No honey, my **** stinks just as much as the next persons. And you are the queen of rude comments.
And you'd like to believe you're not. Try owning your own nastiness before you worry about mine honey...
Show me one place where I have denied that I lose my temper? All I have said from the first minute is that I try not to. That I TRY to stay out of things. YOU are the one that keeps saying I won't admit that.

You called me the queen of rude comments while kissing flans butt (who has a lot more rude comments than me to everyone).

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.
No honey, my **** stinks just as much as the next persons. And you are the queen of rude comments.
And you'd like to believe you're not. Try owning your own nastiness before you worry about mine honey...
Show me one place where I have denied that I lose my temper? All I have said from the first minute is that I try not to. That I TRY to stay out of things. YOU are the one that keeps saying I won't admit that.

REally? It was that difficult to hold your temper against ohfour while she was banned and not even posting? You tried sooooo hard to stay out of her birthday thread and not say anything nasty when she wasn't even on it? You couldn't help yourself? You might need anger management if that's true.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
You two are quite funny. Keep trying to turn this around. I know two things clearly -

flan couldn't be bothered to acknowledge Tig's SS gift on the SS thread, and

NJN felt the need to get a dig in at ohfour on her birthday thread.

And now, they are both trying to deny the nastiness of those things and try to make others out to be the bad guy. Read my signature line.
I said, I hate the bickering. Word for word. Which this thread has now become. I have owned my comment on ohfours birthday thread. Show me where I deny it.

No. That is not what you said.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Ohfour wrote:
I thought this thread was going to be about SS. Too much to hope for i guess...

This is ohfour's very first post on this thread. It has NOTHING to do with you, NJN. NOTHING. But you had to make it about you, didn't you?

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Ohfour wrote:
Well, im glad she appreciates your gift. Too bad that cant be said for everyone...

This is her second post on the thread. Still not a knock against you, NJN.

So yes, you need to OWN your part in this "bickering". You chose to take offense where no rancor was directed at you.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lawyerlady wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
I thought this thread was going to be about SS. Too much to hope for i guess...
This is ohfour's very first post on this thread. It has NOTHING to do with you, NJN. NOTHING. But you had to make it about you, didn't you?

She came in to stir things up. I'm sure you'll deny that.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
You two are quite funny. Keep trying to turn this around. I know two things clearly -

flan couldn't be bothered to acknowledge Tig's SS gift on the SS thread, and

NJN felt the need to get a dig in at ohfour on her birthday thread.

And now, they are both trying to deny the nastiness of those things and try to make others out to be the bad guy. Read my signature line.
I said, I hate the bickering. Word for word. Which this thread has now become. I have owned my comment on ohfours birthday thread. Show me where I deny it.
No. That is not what you said.

Then PLEASE find my original quote. It was most definitely not far from that.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

You know, I believe the statement was "I don't miss the name calling."

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Tinydancer wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

Except Ohfour doesn't act like a big baby and try to deny it. Some people really think their **** don't stink.
No honey, my **** stinks just as much as the next persons. And you are the queen of rude comments.
And you'd like to believe you're not. Try owning your own nastiness before you worry about mine honey...
Show me one place where I have denied that I lose my temper? All I have said from the first minute is that I try not to. That I TRY to stay out of things. YOU are the one that keeps saying I won't admit that.
You called me the queen of rude comments while kissing flans butt (who has a lot more rude comments than me to everyone).

Oh FFS! You despise flan. We all know it. I've resolved my differences with her. I simply do not kiss her ass. I am very well aware of just how much she IS hated around here. It has been made abundantly clear over the past couple of days. Because of that I try really hard NOT to support her publicly. And before you say that that's just as bad as not calling her on the carpet I'll tell you flat out that I do call her on the carpet. I have told her many times she's crossed the line or that she needs to back off certain people. I just don't do it publicly. If I did then it would become a huge dog pile. Not unlike some of the dog piles that have happened (not to flan but in general) on this board.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
You know, I believe the statement was "I don't miss the name calling."

In response to people saying they miss ohfour. And then you followed it up with "it's been peaceful around here lately".

You didn't have to post at all -but you did and it was not necessary, and it was on her birthday thread. What do you and flan have against people enjoying special days?

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
You two are quite funny. Keep trying to turn this around. I know two things clearly -

flan couldn't be bothered to acknowledge Tig's SS gift on the SS thread, and

NJN felt the need to get a dig in at ohfour on her birthday thread.

And now, they are both trying to deny the nastiness of those things and try to make others out to be the bad guy. Read my signature line.
I said, I hate the bickering. Word for word. Which this thread has now become. I have owned my comment on ohfours birthday thread. Show me where I deny it.
No. That is not what you said.
Then PLEASE find my original quote. It was most definitely not far from that.

Here you go -

Domestic Engineer wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
FNW wrote:
Okay, I saw the thread. Her comments were not undeserving, IMO. I will be glad when she returns.
I do not miss the name calling at all. It's been a lot more peaceful lately.
Seriously? Am I understanding you to say that you're glad O4 is banned?

I added DE's response to show that others took it EXACTLY the same way I did.

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

And? I owned that. From the beginning of the thread. And it's also NOT name calling. ohfour was banned for calling names. My statement was a fact followed by my opinion. Just like you have the complete right to tell flan the board would be better off without her. Or me for that fact.