LGS,
I'm really trying to understand your point here. Do you want guns banned? Do you want people with kids to be disallowed guns? You don't think loaded guns should be around children. That's fine. But how are you expecting to fix that?
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
LGS, I'm really trying to understand your point here. Do you want guns banned? Do you want people with kids to be disallowed guns? You don't think loaded guns should be around children. That's fine. But how are you expecting to fix that?
No i dont' want guns banned. I own guns. I have a concealed weapons permit. I carry my gun. But, i am not going to be stupid enough to leave loaded guns laying around. That seems like simple commonsense to me.
My gun is loaded when i carry. When i take my gun off, i unload it. I can have it at the ready with my ammo ready but i know where my gun is as at ALL times and i know who has access to it. Seems like simply being a responsible gun owner to me. But, clearly i am in the minority here.
LGS, I'm really trying to understand your point here. Do you want guns banned? Do you want people with kids to be disallowed guns? You don't think loaded guns should be around children. That's fine. But how are you expecting to fix that?
No i dont' want guns banned. I own guns. I have a concealed weapons permit. I carry my gun. But, i am not going to be stupid enough to leave loaded guns laying around. That seems like simple commonsense to me.
As it does to most people. However, I think the definition of "lying around" is the problem.
And how careful you are with it normally changes as your children age.
My problem with this article is that the kid knew better, his little sister knew better, and he still went into his parents' room, and got a gun out of a drawer - when he was old enough to know not to.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
My gun is loaded when i carry. When i take my gun off, i unload it. I can have it at the ready with my ammo ready but i know where my gun is as at ALL times and i know who has access to it. Seems like simply being a responsible gun owner to me. But, clearly i am in the minority here.
I also know where my gun is at all times. So?
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
My gun is loaded when i carry. When i take my gun off, i unload it. I can have it at the ready with my ammo ready but i know where my gun is as at ALL times and i know who has access to it. Seems like simply being a responsible gun owner to me. But, clearly i am in the minority here.
It's your sanctimonious preaching that puts you in the minority. You seem to think your way to handle guns is the only way to safely do it--when it's not--and that no one else ever handles guns safely, when MILLIONS more people don't have bad things happen than do.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
LGS, I'm really trying to understand your point here. Do you want guns banned? Do you want people with kids to be disallowed guns? You don't think loaded guns should be around children. That's fine. But how are you expecting to fix that?
No i dont' want guns banned. I own guns. I have a concealed weapons permit. I carry my gun. But, i am not going to be stupid enough to leave loaded guns laying around. That seems like simple commonsense to me.
As it does to most people. However, I think the definition of "lying around" is the problem.
And how careful you are with it normally changes as your children age.
My problem with this article is that the kid knew better, his little sister knew better, and he still went into his parents' room, and got a gun out of a drawer - when he was old enough to know not to.
Exactly. The gun wasn't lying around.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
You act like everyone who does things differently than you would is paying some huge "price". That is simply untrue. Again, such incidents are beyond rare.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Arguig for the "right" to leave loaded guns laying around your house when you have kids seems foolish to me. But, if you want to, then go ahead. Who is stopping you? Put a loaded gun in every room cuz you never know when trouble will come through your front door. Go for it!
Well guess what? You can be sanctimonious and "right". But, they still buried their dead daughter.
People bury the kids for all kinds of accidents. That is what they are. MOST accidents could be prevented if people acted perfectly all the time. The level of negligence is what makes the difference. And while it might be negligent to leave a loaded gun in reach of a toddler, it is not negligence to have a loaded gun in the house with older children that have been taught not to touch.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Well guess what? You can be sanctimonious and "right". But, they still buried their dead daughter.
People bury the kids for all kinds of accidents. That is what they are. MOST accidents could be prevented if people acted perfectly all the time. The level of negligence is what makes the difference. And while it might be negligent to leave a loaded gun in reach of a toddler, it is not negligence to have a loaded gun in the house with older children that have been taught not to touch.
So, now you are agreeing that there are degrees of negligence when it comes to guns?
Arguig for the "right" to leave loaded guns laying around your house when you have kids seems foolish to me. But, if you want to, then go ahead. Who is stopping you? Put a loaded gun in every room cuz you never know when trouble will come through your front door. Go for it!
it wasn't "laying around" at all. You are just being ridiculous. Comparing 10 year olds and 2 year olds as if they are the same, arguing "facts" that are not facts.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Well guess what? You can be sanctimonious and "right". But, they still buried their dead daughter.
People bury the kids for all kinds of accidents. That is what they are. MOST accidents could be prevented if people acted perfectly all the time. The level of negligence is what makes the difference. And while it might be negligent to leave a loaded gun in reach of a toddler, it is not negligence to have a loaded gun in the house with older children that have been taught not to touch.
So, now you are agreeing that there are degrees of negligence when it comes to guns?
What Tinydancer said. Geesh.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Well guess what? You can be sanctimonious and "right". But, they still buried their dead daughter.
People bury the kids for all kinds of accidents. That is what they are. MOST accidents could be prevented if people acted perfectly all the time. The level of negligence is what makes the difference. And while it might be negligent to leave a loaded gun in reach of a toddler, it is not negligence to have a loaded gun in the house with older children that have been taught not to touch.
So, now you are agreeing that there are degrees of negligence when it comes to guns?
Of course there are. You are the one that is saying "this is how you must do things with no exceptions".
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
Well guess what? You can be sanctimonious and "right". But, they still buried their dead daughter.
People bury the kids for all kinds of accidents. That is what they are. MOST accidents could be prevented if people acted perfectly all the time. The level of negligence is what makes the difference. And while it might be negligent to leave a loaded gun in reach of a toddler, it is not negligence to have a loaded gun in the house with older children that have been taught not to touch.
So, now you are agreeing that there are degrees of negligence when it comes to guns?
Of course there are. You are the one that is saying "this is how you must do things with no exceptions".
Seriously. Yes, it's negligent to put a loaded gun on the floor beside your 2 year old's bed. A loaded gun in in a drawer while my 10 year old is home? Not even.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
Well guess what? You can be sanctimonious and "right". But, they still buried their dead daughter.
People bury the kids for all kinds of accidents. That is what they are. MOST accidents could be prevented if people acted perfectly all the time. The level of negligence is what makes the difference. And while it might be negligent to leave a loaded gun in reach of a toddler, it is not negligence to have a loaded gun in the house with older children that have been taught not to touch.
So, now you are agreeing that there are degrees of negligence when it comes to guns?
Of course there are. You are the one that is saying "this is how you must do things with no exceptions".
Seriously. Yes, it's negligent to put a loaded gun on the floor beside your 2 year old's bed. A loaded gun in in a drawer while my 10 year old is home? Not even.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
Responsible gun ownership means teaching your kids to respect firearms if you are going to have them in the house.
There is NO WHERE you can keep a gun in a house that a determine 10 year old couldn't get to. So, if you are relying on hiding your gun rather than teaching your kids to respect it, and heck, even use it when they are old enough, you are not being responsible, IMO.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
You are the one that can't accept a different approach.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
You are the one that can't accept a different approach.
You are the one saying a loaded gun is fine for ALL 10 yr olds. Um yeah.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
Proper child development also requires increasing levels of responsibility, trust, and independence.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
No, yOu obviously do not, you treat teenagers like toddlers. You have to hold their hand to cross the street.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
First, my kids are grown and gone but if the grandkids come over the gun is locked up. Your scenario is not everyones' so get over it already.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
No, yOu obviously do not, you treat teenagers like toddlers. You have to hold their hand to cross the street.
That isn't what i said. But, if you want to try to try insult my parenting then have at it.
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
You are the one that can't accept a different approach.
You are the one saying a loaded gun is fine for ALL 10 yr olds. Um yeah.
If yiu failed to teach your children to act responsibly, that's on yOu. Like I said, my kids could load the guns themselves by that age.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
You are the one that can't accept a different approach.
You are the one saying a loaded gun is fine for ALL 10 yr olds. Um yeah.
It should be for the ones with guns in the house. They should have already been taught proper gun safety and not to touch it. It should have been shown to them, explained to them, and the dangers made very clear.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
First, my kids are grown and gone but if the grandkids come over the gun is locked up. Your scenario is not everyones' so get over it already.
Why are you locking the gun? Aren't your grandkids smart enough to not touch the loaded gun?
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
You are the one that can't accept a different approach.
You are the one saying a loaded gun is fine for ALL 10 yr olds. Um yeah.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
First, my kids are grown and gone but if the grandkids come over the gun is locked up. Your scenario is not everyones' so get over it already.
Why are you locking the gun? Aren't your grandkids smart enough to not touch the loaded gun?
They are toddlers. I believe we've made the distinction clear. But you just want to keep arguing.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
First, my kids are grown and gone but if the grandkids come over the gun is locked up. Your scenario is not everyones' so get over it already.
Why are you locking the gun? Aren't your grandkids smart enough to not touch the loaded gun?
Now you are contradicting yourself! LOL! My guns are LOCKED! Why?
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
No, yOu obviously do not, you treat teenagers like toddlers. You have to hold their hand to cross the street.
That isn't what i said. But, if you want to try to try insult my parenting then have at it.
LOL!!! You are doing exactly that to everyone else. Spouting nonsense about leaving guns "lay around" where two year olds can get them and other crap.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
First, my kids are grown and gone but if the grandkids come over the gun is locked up. Your scenario is not everyones' so get over it already.
Why are you locking the gun? Aren't your grandkids smart enough to not touch the loaded gun?
They are young (6, 4, and 2) and are not used to having a gun in the house. When they are older I will personally take them to the gun range and make sure they know all about guns. You can leave you kids in ignorant bliss if you want to.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
Ha! You are the ones saying "this is right, no exceptions" Every 10 yr old should KNOW BETTER. I am not the one saying that. ANd, you can't even accept a different approach from a fellow gun owner. WHo are the rigid ones here?
You are the one that can't accept a different approach.
You are the one saying a loaded gun is fine for ALL 10 yr olds. Um yeah.
It should be for the ones with guns in the house. They should have already been taught proper gun safety and not to touch it. It should have been shown to them, explained to them, and the dangers made very clear.
Ten-year-olds KNOW a lot of things. It doesn't mean they always obey the rules. Some things, like GUNS, have deadly consequences. I'm certainly not about to risk my child's life on an assumption.
I didn't say any different either. I own guns. Are you arguing just to argue? I also believe in responsible gun ownership. If you don't, that's OK.
You are projecting again. I am not the gun owner in the op. You are NOT the only one who is responsible gun owner and to think you are is pretty out there.
Oh i am "out there"? Except i am not the one leaving loaded guns laying around for kids because i happen to understand child development and understand that kids are kids.
First, my kids are grown and gone but if the grandkids come over the gun is locked up. Your scenario is not everyones' so get over it already.
Why are you locking the gun? Aren't your grandkids smart enough to not touch the loaded gun?
They are young (6, 4, and 2) and are not used to having a gun in the house. When they are older I will personally take them to the gun range and make sure they know all about guns. You can leave you kids in ignorant bliss if you want to.