I agree. At least someone who was currently raising kids. It gives you a different perspective. Someone married would have been nice. It hard to take relationship advice from someone not married. It makes me want to scream "what do YOU know about it? Have you had to look at the same person across the dinner table for the last 20 years?" Lol.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
I thought it was just me that didnt care for this prudie. By the way, when did this happen? I dont keep up with prudie much, but I am curious when the old one left and why.
I thought it was just me that didnt care for this prudie. By the way, when did this happen? I dont keep up with prudie much, but I am curious when the old one left and why.
Just a couple of months ago. She's been replaced by a 29 year old, never married, childless, lesbian.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
She's been replaced by a 29 year old, never married, childless, lesbian.
- Lawyerlady
______________________________
Except the lesbian part, that explains a lot of "her" new advice style, and why it's so crappy. I don't think her being a lesbian hurts or helps with her advice giving.
Of course it does. Most of the population isn't gay. You generally seek advice from people who have had similar life experiences. So, no, she doesn't have the perspective of life, marriage and children that most people do. Part of it is her age and lack of wisdom and years in this world. And, the other part is the indoctrination into the whole radical gay agenda and all the liberal swill that results from that.
However, this should make her columns even more fun. Cuz now , not only can we dogpile the stupid LW, but we can dogpile Prudie for her idiot advice! LOL!
She's been replaced by a 29 year old, never married, childless, lesbian. - Lawyerlady
______________________________
Except the lesbian part, that explains a lot of "her" new advice style, and why it's so crappy. I don't think her being a lesbian hurts or helps with her advice giving.
It doesn't.
George R.R. Martin was once asked how he wrote his women characters so well. His response was "I've always considered women to be people."
Liberals don't see people. They see Victim Groups. They see hyphenated Americans. They don't see people. Everyone has to be put into the box they assign.
Liberals don't see people. They see Victim Groups. They see hyphenated Americans. They don't see people. Everyone has to be put into the box they assign.
Same as Conservatives...you used 2 labels in your single post.
There was one where a young gay woman wrote in b/c her family didn't jump for joy when she announced she was gay. Prudie told her she was better off without them in her life and basically never to bother talking to them again.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Of course it does. Most of the population isn't gay. You generally seek advice from people who have had similar life experiences. So, no, she doesn't have the perspective of life, marriage and children that most people do. Part of it is her age and lack of wisdom and years in this world. And, the other part is the indoctrination into the whole radical gay agenda and all the liberal swill that results from that.
- Lady Gaga Snerd
________________________________
"The Wall Between Us: My husband supports Donald Trump, will it ruin our marriage."
"Chosen One: Prudie advises a woman whose in-laws only give gifts to one of her kids."
"I Ink I Love You: Prudie advises a student who got tattoos in tribute to her professor."
"In Fidelity: My cheating husband died suddenly, and I want to help his mistress."
"Tween Delinquent: My lazy, ungrateful 10-year-old is getting F’s in school."
"Telltale Hurt: Prudie counsels a woman scared to tell her husband she was molested as a child."
Those are all recent columns. Other than swapping the word "wife" for the word "husband" in her responses for some of those, if she were to take the "if it was me" stance, how would her being a lesbian affect any advice she could give? I don't see how it would.
There was one where a young gay woman wrote in b/c her family didn't jump for joy when she announced she was gay. Prudie told her she was better off without them in her life and basically never to bother talking to them again.
- Lawyerlady
_____________________________
I didn't see that one. Is it possible though that maybe she is better off without them? Did she say "they didn't jump for joy" or is that your personal interpretation?
What would you say if the issue was religious choice instead of sexual orientation? While religion isn't something a person is born with, unlike sexual orientation, it still divides families. So what if the letter writer wanted to become Mormon against Atheist parents, or vice versa? I'm guessing you'd definitely support "better off without them" if a person was choosing Christian over Atheist, instead of Mormon over Atheist.