TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Prudie:Inconsiderate Inlaws


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Dear Prudie:Inconsiderate Inlaws
Permalink  
 


Q. Inconsiderate in-laws: I have been with my husband for five years. I have a daughter from a previous marriage who is now 10 and a 4-year-old daughter with my husband. Every year, his parents and other extended family acknowledge my younger daughter’s birthday. Last year on her birthday, when an aunt asked for our address so that she could send money, I requested that she not send anything because our children are noticing and it causes hurt feelings. We requested they treat the girls the same because they are sisters. She promised to include my oldest. Well, that didn’t happen. Again, we are sent a card and money for our younger and my older had received nothing. I would like to cut these people from our lives, but my husband feels torn. What do I do?

A: Send the card back. Be polite when you run into your husband’s aunt at family gatherings, but blandly and cheerfully send back any cards or gifts that refuse to acknowledge you have two children. You are asking your husband’s relatives to recognize that your daughter from a previous marriage is neither a ghost nor a mistake from your past you’re forced to lug around with your newer, better family. This is not an unusual request. Your elder daughter will appreciate the fact that her parents advocated for her being acknowledged as a human being who possesses the quality of existence.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

This LW is married to the father of her second child, way different from the other letter being debated.

Yup, the family needs to recognized the whole family unit, not just "their" part. What a bunch of arses.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

They are a bunch of arses. But I'm not sure what else "she" can do. Her husband need to step up and deal with them. And I'm not sure sending the cards back is good for her younger daughter either. Punish her for the bad behavior of someone else?

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

FNW wrote:

They are a bunch of arses. But I'm not sure what else "she" can do. Her husband need to step up and deal with them. And I'm not sure sending the cards back is good for her younger daughter either. Punish her for the bad behavior of someone else?


  I agree,, why punish the younger child?  What I would  do is send a nice thank you note with a note the money  will be used for something  both girls  will enjoy.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1469
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lindley wrote:
FNW wrote:

They are a bunch of arses. But I'm not sure what else "she" can do. Her husband need to step up and deal with them. And I'm not sure sending the cards back is good for her younger daughter either. Punish her for the bad behavior of someone else?


  I agree,, why punish the younger child?  What I would  do is send a nice thank you note with a note the money  will be used for something  both girls  will enjoy.


 That's a good idea : )



__________________
Just suck it up and get on with it.
FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Excellent idea, Lindley.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I can't believe people actually treat kids like this.

I wouldn't need my husband to say anything.

I'd tell them myself.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

They are married, so now that child is your grandchild so treat her as such.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

They are married, so now that child is your grandchild so treat her as such.


 Unless the child is adopted by the other parent, that is not true.  They would still have their own grandparents from the ex.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

My SIL has a daughter from her previous marriage. We have always considered her ours. She does have her bio-dads family but that doesn't mean she isn't our family too. She now has a baby of her own & my mom calls her her great grandchild.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

This isn't a "random kid". This is blood sibling to the other child.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

This isn't a "random kid". This is blood sibling to the other child.


 But it has no relationship to me.  

 

 



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 I agree that they don't have to do any of that.  But they should buy her birthday and Christmas gifts. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 I agree that they don't have to do any of that.  But they should buy her birthday and Christmas gifts. 


 I don't disagree--but then you aren't treating them like your own family, either.  Plus, that's the question I've been asking all week and no one has answered it, yet.  Where is that line drawn?



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 Except when they dont have their own Grandparents...all but one of my grandparents were gone before i was 8. Gs kids knew only one of theirs. Not everyone has grandparents.



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:m

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 Except when they dont have their own Grandparents...all but one of my grandparents were gone before i was 8. Gs kids knew only one of theirs. Not everyone has grandparents.


Most do-but even if not, Too bad, so sad.  Not my problem.  That still doesn't obligate me to buy them cars or paynfor their college even if I'd do it for my actual grandkids.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.

__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 I agree that they don't have to do any of that.  But they should buy her birthday and Christmas gifts. 


 I don't disagree--but then you aren't treating them like your own family, either.  Plus, that's the question I've been asking all week and no one has answered it, yet.  Where is that line drawn?


 When it comes to inheritances and such, the law actually draws the line for you.  If they died without a will, that child would not get anything, so why do they have to change that if they do write one?

You leave everything to your children, per stirpes.  That goes down the bloodline, and step don't count. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 I agree that they don't have to do any of that.  But they should buy her birthday and Christmas gifts. 


 I don't disagree--but then you aren't treating them like your own family, either.  Plus, that's the question I've been asking all week and no one has answered it, yet.  Where is that line drawn?


 When it comes to inheritances and such, the law actually draws the line for you.  If they died without a will, that child would not get anything, so why do they have to change that if they do write one?

You leave everything to your children, per stirpes.  That goes down the bloodline, and step don't count. 


 I was talking about when yiu do have a will--which everyone should.  That still doesn't answer the question.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 I agree that they don't have to do any of that.  But they should buy her birthday and Christmas gifts. 


 I don't disagree--but then you aren't treating them like your own family, either.  Plus, that's the question I've been asking all week and no one has answered it, yet.  Where is that line drawn?


 When it comes to inheritances and such, the law actually draws the line for you.  If they died without a will, that child would not get anything, so why do they have to change that if they do write one?

You leave everything to your children, per stirpes.  That goes down the bloodline, and step don't count. 


 I was talking about when yiu do have a will--which everyone should.  That still doesn't answer the question.


In actual practice, it is very rare that grandchildren are personally named in a will, and if they are, it's because their parents are dead or worthless with money, and the grandparents set up a trust for their education. 

Most of the time, it is left to the children, per stirpes, and no grandchildren are NAMED.  That let's the law handle that issue.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


 I think it is going to vary by family and circumstance.

For me, my moms side of the family is an active part of our life, so like you say- I had my own grandparents to do that stuff, but I have a friend whose son's bio dad hasn't even met him, the bio dad lives in another country and they are not able to get his rights terminated so that her husband can adopt the son. Her husband's parents and family treat him the same as their daughter that they have together, and will for the rest of his life- including the big stuff. 

But, really it is up to the parents. If they consider those 'random' kids their own and you (grandparent) refuse to acknowledge that since they are not bio, you are just going to hurt yourself. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I agree but marriage means something. She needs to treat her son's family as her own family.


 BS.  No way would I put some random kid in my will, or start them a college fund, or buy theM a car for graduation.  Their own grandparents can do that.


 I agree that they don't have to do any of that.  But they should buy her birthday and Christmas gifts. 


 I don't disagree--but then you aren't treating them like your own family, either.  Plus, that's the question I've been asking all week and no one has answered it, yet.  Where is that line drawn?


 When it comes to inheritances and such, the law actually draws the line for you.  If they died without a will, that child would not get anything, so why do they have to change that if they do write one?

You leave everything to your children, per stirpes.  That goes down the bloodline, and step don't count. 


 I was talking about when yiu do have a will--which everyone should.  That still doesn't answer the question.


In actual practice, it is very rare that grandchildren are personally named in a will, and if they are, it's because their parents are dead or worthless with money, and the grandparents set up a trust for their education. 

Most of the time, it is left to the children, per stirpes, and no grandchildren are NAMED.  That let's the law handle that issue.


 Ours are not specifically named, but only blood relatives can be part of the inheritance from my mom.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


I don't know where they "drew the line".  Whenever I was there, they had gifts for me in the same number as my little brother and sister.  When I was in college, which was only a few miles from their house, they usually took me to dinner once a week and when the weather was nice, let me and my roommates come and use the pool.  They were grandparents.  They may have done more for my siblings when I wasn't there, but I neither noticed or cared.  And they are not dead, yet, but I don't expect to be in the will.  Nor do I expect that my siblings will be b/c my step-mother is still alive.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


 I think it is going to vary by family and circumstance.

For me, my moms side of the family is an active part of our life, so like you say- I had my own grandparents to do that stuff, but I have a friend whose son's bio dad hasn't even met him, the bio dad lives in another country and they are not able to get his rights terminated so that her husband can adopt the son. Her husband's parents and family treat him the same as their daughter that they have together, and will for the rest of his life- including the big stuff. 

But, really it is up to the parents. If they consider those 'random' kids their own and you (grandparent) refuse to acknowledge that since they are not bio, you are just going to hurt yourself. 


 Or they may end up hurting some of their kids.  Are they really going to turn down a college savings fund?  

 

again, where is the line drawn?  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


 I think it is going to vary by family and circumstance.

For me, my moms side of the family is an active part of our life, so like you say- I had my own grandparents to do that stuff, but I have a friend whose son's bio dad hasn't even met him, the bio dad lives in another country and they are not able to get his rights terminated so that her husband can adopt the son. Her husband's parents and family treat him the same as their daughter that they have together, and will for the rest of his life- including the big stuff. 

But, really it is up to the parents. If they consider those 'random' kids their own and you (grandparent) refuse to acknowledge that since they are not bio, you are just going to hurt yourself. 


 Or they may end up hurting some of their kids.  Are they really going to turn down a college savings fund?  

 

again, where is the line drawn?  


 Maybe. If your son has two kids, one bio one step that he has been raising since toddlerhood and considers his own, I could see them turning it down, or splitting it between the kids- and then cutting off the person who refuses to recognize one of their children. 

I already said the 'line' is going to vary. I don't think it is black and white for every family. Honestly, I don't think it is as difficult as you are making it seem.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


I don't know where they "drew the line".  Whenever I was there, they had gifts for me in the same number as my little brother and sister.  When I was in college, which was only a few miles from their house, they usually took me to dinner once a week and when the weather was nice, let me and my roommates come and use the pool.  They were grandparents.  They may have done more for my siblings when I wasn't there, but I neither noticed or cared.  And they are not dead, yet, but I don't expect to be in the will.  Nor do I expect that my siblings will be b/c my step-mother is still alive.


 But that's the problem.  No one knows where to draw the line, they've even said it varies by family--but then when the family wants to draw it, someone is all butthurt.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.


 FFS. They are not random to their parents. And yes, it is mean to consider a kid your child is a step parent to as 'random' and not worthy of a birthday gift.



__________________


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

We give gifts to my SS's sister, no relation to us, every birthday and Christmas. We are not obligated to in any way. We even buy DH's ex wife a Christmas gift. We bought her a Keurig one year. When she was short on cash we bought SS's sister a new car seat (she was a baby) because she needed one and we wanted her to be safe. One year, don't know why that year was so important, he was really upset that he didn't have his very own gift to give his sister for her birthday. I personally took him to pick out a gift for her with my own money. Not my husband's money. Mine. It was important to him so I did it.

We are not required to do crap for them. We do it because, in the bigger picture, it sets an example for my SS. It shows him that even though his sister is not ours that we still value her and value her relationship with him. We treat his mother well because it demonstrates to him that you can show kindness to someone you are not obligated to show kindness to. These may only be "gifts", and they may be crap to others, and some people may not even care, but I promise you this... Our children are watching our behavior. They see what we say and do. They see how we act and respond.

Do whatever you want people. It's your decision to make. No one can tell you what to do. Give a gift, don't give a gift. But always remember you don't live in a vacuum. Life has a way of coming back to you.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

We give gifts to my SS's sister, no relation to us, every birthday and Christmas. We are not obligated to in any way. We even buy DH's ex wife a Christmas gift. We bought her a Keurig one year. When she was short on cash we bought SS's sister a new car seat (she was a baby) because she needed one and we wanted her to be safe. One year, don't know why that year was so important, he was really upset that he didn't have his very own gift to give his sister for her birthday. I personally took him to pick out a gift for her with my own money. Not my husband's money. Mine. It was important to him so I did it.

We are not required to do crap for them. We do it because, in the bigger picture, it sets an example for my SS. It shows him that even though his sister is not ours that we still value her and value her relationship with him. We treat his mother well because it demonstrates to him that you can show kindness to someone you are not obligated to show kindness to. These may only be "gifts", and they may be crap to others, and some people may not even care, but I promise you this... Our children are watching our behavior. They see what we say and do. They see how we act and respond.

Do whatever you want people. It's your decision to make. No one can tell you what to do. Give a gift, don't give a gift. But always remember you don't live in a vacuum. Life has a way of coming back to you.


 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

A step child is not a random kid. What they leave to their grandchildren in their will is their own business but to exclude a child on their birthday and Christmas just because they are not blood is cruel. Their son married her mother so she became a part of his family so they should respect that.

__________________


My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.


 I don't believe you are really that cold hearted.  If one of your sons married a woman with a child would you seriously not give the child Christmas & birthday gifts just because it wasn't a bio child of your son?



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.


 FFS. They are not random to their parents. And yes, it is mean to consider a kid your child is a step parent to as 'random' and not worthy of a birthday gift.


 No, they aren't random to the parents, so they can give them gifts.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

We give gifts to my SS's sister, no relation to us, every birthday and Christmas. We are not obligated to in any way. We even buy DH's ex wife a Christmas gift. We bought her a Keurig one year. When she was short on cash we bought SS's sister a new car seat (she was a baby) because she needed one and we wanted her to be safe. One year, don't know why that year was so important, he was really upset that he didn't have his very own gift to give his sister for her birthday. I personally took him to pick out a gift for her with my own money. Not my husband's money. Mine. It was important to him so I did it.

We are not required to do crap for them. We do it because, in the bigger picture, it sets an example for my SS. It shows him that even though his sister is not ours that we still value her and value her relationship with him. We treat his mother well because it demonstrates to him that you can show kindness to someone you are not obligated to show kindness to. These may only be "gifts", and they may be crap to others, and some people may not even care, but I promise you this... Our children are watching our behavior. They see what we say and do. They see how we act and respond.

Do whatever you want people. It's your decision to make. No one can tell you what to do. Give a gift, don't give a gift. But always remember you don't live in a vacuum. Life has a way of coming back to you.


 👍



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lexxy wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.


 I don't believe you are really that cold hearted.  If one of your sons married a woman with a child would you seriously not give the child Christmas & birthday gifts just because it wasn't a bio child of your son?


 I didn't say that.  In fact, when someone else made that very point, I said, and I quote "I don't disagree".



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

We give gifts to my SS's sister, no relation to us, every birthday and Christmas. We are not obligated to in any way. We even buy DH's ex wife a Christmas gift. We bought her a Keurig one year. When she was short on cash we bought SS's sister a new car seat (she was a baby) because she needed one and we wanted her to be safe. One year, don't know why that year was so important, he was really upset that he didn't have his very own gift to give his sister for her birthday. I personally took him to pick out a gift for her with my own money. Not my husband's money. Mine. It was important to him so I did it.

We are not required to do crap for them. We do it because, in the bigger picture, it sets an example for my SS. It shows him that even though his sister is not ours that we still value her and value her relationship with him. We treat his mother well because it demonstrates to him that you can show kindness to someone you are not obligated to show kindness to. These may only be "gifts", and they may be crap to others, and some people may not even care, but I promise you this... Our children are watching our behavior. They see what we say and do. They see how we act and respond.

Do whatever you want people. It's your decision to make. No one can tell you what to do. Give a gift, don't give a gift. But always remember you don't live in a vacuum. Life has a way of coming back to you.


 


 I second it thumbsup.gif



-- Edited by Lexxy on Wednesday 2nd of March 2016 02:38:39 PM

__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.


 FFS. They are not random to their parents. And yes, it is mean to consider a kid your child is a step parent to as 'random' and not worthy of a birthday gift.


 No, they aren't random to the parents, so they can give them gifts.


 Whatever. Think what you want, but if it was me and members of my family considered my step child some rando, then they wouldn't be invited anymore.  

ETA: Changed DO to Think



-- Edited by NAOW on Wednesday 2nd of March 2016 02:39:17 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Not a huge loss, I'm sure.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lexxy wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
NAOW wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Life isn't always fair. Grandparents can do with their money what they want. But being mean to a kid by skipping their birthday when they are married into your family is just that......mean.


 Life isn't fair.  Their parents could have made better choices.


 They can always start making better choices.. by not associating with the people who are mean to their kids. 


 Failing to give gifts to some random kids isn't "mean".  No one is somehow entitled to a gift.

 

Holy entitlement batman.


 I don't believe you are really that cold hearted.  If one of your sons married a woman with a child would you seriously not give the child Christmas & birthday gifts just because it wasn't a bio child of your son?


 I didn't say that.  In fact, when someone else made that very point, I said, and I quote "I don't disagree".


 So you are arguing for the sake of argument not arguing what you would actually do?  LOL, carry on.  And as I said previously I knew you weren't that cold hearted.



__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


I don't know where they "drew the line".  Whenever I was there, they had gifts for me in the same number as my little brother and sister.  When I was in college, which was only a few miles from their house, they usually took me to dinner once a week and when the weather was nice, let me and my roommates come and use the pool.  They were grandparents.  They may have done more for my siblings when I wasn't there, but I neither noticed or cared.  And they are not dead, yet, but I don't expect to be in the will.  Nor do I expect that my siblings will be b/c my step-mother is still alive.


 But that's the problem.  No one knows where to draw the line, they've even said it varies by family--but then when the family wants to draw it, someone is all butthurt.


 Well, in THIS OP, it isn't about wills or college funds - it's about birthday gifts.  It should be a no-brainer.  You don't buy one kid in a household a gift and not the other.  That's ridiculous.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


I don't know where they "drew the line".  Whenever I was there, they had gifts for me in the same number as my little brother and sister.  When I was in college, which was only a few miles from their house, they usually took me to dinner once a week and when the weather was nice, let me and my roommates come and use the pool.  They were grandparents.  They may have done more for my siblings when I wasn't there, but I neither noticed or cared.  And they are not dead, yet, but I don't expect to be in the will.  Nor do I expect that my siblings will be b/c my step-mother is still alive.


 But that's the problem.  No one knows where to draw the line, they've even said it varies by family--but then when the family wants to draw it, someone is all butthurt.


 Well, in THIS OP, it isn't about wills or college funds - it's about birthday gifts.  It should be a no-brainer.  You don't buy one kid in a household a gift and not the other.  That's ridiculous.


 Again, don't disagree--still doesn't answer the question.  

 

I just just think expecting everyone to change their outlook and way of doing things because of a decision you make is silly.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


I don't know where they "drew the line".  Whenever I was there, they had gifts for me in the same number as my little brother and sister.  When I was in college, which was only a few miles from their house, they usually took me to dinner once a week and when the weather was nice, let me and my roommates come and use the pool.  They were grandparents.  They may have done more for my siblings when I wasn't there, but I neither noticed or cared.  And they are not dead, yet, but I don't expect to be in the will.  Nor do I expect that my siblings will be b/c my step-mother is still alive.


 But that's the problem.  No one knows where to draw the line, they've even said it varies by family--but then when the family wants to draw it, someone is all butthurt.


 Well, in THIS OP, it isn't about wills or college funds - it's about birthday gifts.  It should be a no-brainer.  You don't buy one kid in a household a gift and not the other.  That's ridiculous.


 Again, don't disagree--still doesn't answer the question.  

 

I just just think expecting everyone to change their outlook and way of doing things because of a decision you make is silly.


 It's about birthday and Christmas gifts - the line beyond that doesn't matter.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
NAOW wrote:

My step mom's family didn't put me in their will or anything huge like that, but they always icluded me on birthdays and holidays. So you can argue that no one 'has' to, but that small gesture sure means a lot to a kid.. it matters a lot if you don't too.


 Yes, and my step-grandparents always had gifts for me as well.  They often treated me better than my own grandparents did.


 Where is the line drawn?  What is a "small"gesture?  What is significant enough to just say grandkids only?


I don't know where they "drew the line".  Whenever I was there, they had gifts for me in the same number as my little brother and sister.  When I was in college, which was only a few miles from their house, they usually took me to dinner once a week and when the weather was nice, let me and my roommates come and use the pool.  They were grandparents.  They may have done more for my siblings when I wasn't there, but I neither noticed or cared.  And they are not dead, yet, but I don't expect to be in the will.  Nor do I expect that my siblings will be b/c my step-mother is still alive.


 But that's the problem.  No one knows where to draw the line, they've even said it varies by family--but then when the family wants to draw it, someone is all butthurt.


 Well, in THIS OP, it isn't about wills or college funds - it's about birthday gifts.  It should be a no-brainer.  You don't buy one kid in a household a gift and not the other.  That's ridiculous.


 Again, don't disagree--still doesn't answer the question.  

 

I just just think expecting everyone to change their outlook and way of doing things because of a decision you make is silly.


 It's about birthday and Christmas gifts - the line beyond that doesn't matter.


 Ok.  I can live with that.

 

However, then the earlier assertion (not by you but by another poster) that they be treated "exactly" like the other kids is BS. 

But at least that's an answer.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard