TOTALLY GEEKED!

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

RE: Missouri passes bill to put religious liberty amendment on ballot

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRe6wSFnl3YRCycQEEi59gnLhUk3owPakAXxBvkPr7X_2LHc4Txxw

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTeUwT8bQH42TPftdXNdcO791u8aD2ibYCc8pHuLske-YfJ8Hyxug

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQM-uYOEZm4bS1Q1rl3TVv55BXEXspKYOJlrjJN7Q9jl322kpTR

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS998tWEDVAfjHPyTZpYUbotUP9pifKNOQmi3w4JnvFj6a36MBdug

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTAEPtkinMWVD0KFGLwJPs0xBZkf2rVlKi7ouM38VNh_S1RG5k4

chef · Guru

NJN: All those moose pics remind me of the Merry Christmoose PJs I showed you.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Lol! Isn't the Trumpster saying "Make America Great Again"?
That means it's not so great.
Better than Canada.
Oh good, here come the insults.
flan

Because her comment was not an insult????? confuse confuse confuse

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

chef wrote:
NJN: All those moose pics remind me of the Merry Christmoose PJs I showed you.

Those pajama's were cute! You're raising that kid right.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Why did y'all have to bring the mooses into it? The mooses have never done anything to anyone. #leavethemoosesalone

First it was weiner dogs...Now mooses...

What next?

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

Okay, learn to spell if you want to make a meme...

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

One moose, two meece.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
One moose, two meece.

One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish!

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Black fish, blue fish, old fish, new fish
This one has a little star
This one has a little car
Say what a lot of fish there are.

Ohfour · Hooker

Flan still hasn't answered my question. Wanna see my shocked face?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
Flan still hasn't answered my question. Wanna see my shocked face?

Nope.

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
It is a sin to have any type of sexual activity outside of marriage.

The Bible says straight out it is a sin and an abomination for homosexual sex at all, even if "married".

So yes, a Biblical church will preach that and hold that belief.

But there is a difference in a couple picking up a dozen cupcakes and a couple wanting a cake made and delivered and set up.

And that's where many of us disagree.
flan

So you would have no problem catering a KKK rally? Making the food, setting it up, and serving the attendees?

Comparing a hate group to homosexuals tells me all I need to know about you.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

So, you are ok with discriminating against things that YOU dont agree with, but others dont get that right. The hypocrisy is astounding, and sadly, not in the least surprising.

Ohfour · Hooker

And you still didnt answer the question. DEFLECT is your mantra...

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
And you still didnt answer the question. DEFLECT is your mantra...

May you find peace somewhere, sometime...

flan

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
One moose, two meece.

I love mooses!

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Okay, learn to spell if you want to make a meme...
flan

I DID NOT INVENT ANY OF THESE MEME'S! biggrin

Ohfour · Hooker

flan327 wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
And you still didnt answer the question. DEFLECT is your mantra...
May you find peace somewhere, sometime...
flan

Another deflection! Lol! You never cease to come through! At least youre consistent!

weltschmerz · Guru

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
Okay, learn to spell if you want to make a meme...
flan
I DID NOT INVENT ANY OF THESE MEME'S!

Oh, I know that!

When I worked at an inner-city library, we discovered lots of graffiti in the restroom. One of my favorites was seeing "b1tch" misspelled.

flan

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

LOL If you are going to spell out a cuss word at least spell it right!

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
It is a sin to have any type of sexual activity outside of marriage.

The Bible says straight out it is a sin and an abomination for homosexual sex at all, even if "married".

So yes, a Biblical church will preach that and hold that belief.

But there is a difference in a couple picking up a dozen cupcakes and a couple wanting a cake made and delivered and set up.

And that's where many of us disagree.
flan

So you would have no problem catering a KKK rally? Making the food, setting it up, and serving the attendees?

I wouldn't cater a KKK rally, and here's why.

Racists aren't a protected class. People can't help being female or black or gay or disabled.

Racists don't have such protections. I'm allowed to refuse their vile business.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:
LOL If you are going to spell out a cuss word at least spell it right!

I know!

flan

p.s. You're in a library...we have dictionaries...LOL

huskerbb · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
It is a sin to have any type of sexual activity outside of marriage.

The Bible says straight out it is a sin and an abomination for homosexual sex at all, even if "married".

So yes, a Biblical church will preach that and hold that belief.

But there is a difference in a couple picking up a dozen cupcakes and a couple wanting a cake made and delivered and set up.

And that's where many of us disagree.
flan

So you would have no problem catering a KKK rally? Making the food, setting it up, and serving the attendees?

I wouldn't cater a KKK rally, and here's why.
Racists aren't a protected class. People can't help being female or black or gay or disabled.
Racists don't have such protections. I'm allowed to refuse their vile business.

Gay business is vile, too. Neither are they a constitutionally protected class.

In fact, freedom of speech--even racist speeh, is constitutionally protected. The freedom to cornhole some guy is not.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Saturday 12th of March 2016 03:44:37 PM

-- Edited by huskerbb on Saturday 12th of March 2016 03:45:16 PM

weltschmerz · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
It is a sin to have any type of sexual activity outside of marriage.

The Bible says straight out it is a sin and an abomination for homosexual sex at all, even if "married".

So yes, a Biblical church will preach that and hold that belief.

But there is a difference in a couple picking up a dozen cupcakes and a couple wanting a cake made and delivered and set up.

And that's where many of us disagree.
flan

So you would have no problem catering a KKK rally? Making the food, setting it up, and serving the attendees?

I wouldn't cater a KKK rally, and here's why.
Racists aren't a protected class. People can't help being female or black or gay or disabled.
Racists don't have such protections. I'm allowed to refuse their vile business.
Gay business is vile, too. Neither are they a constitutionally protected class.

In fact, freedom of speech--even racist speeh, is constitutionally protected. The freedom to cornhole some guy is not.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Saturday 12th of March 2016 03:44:37 PM

-- Edited by huskerbb on Saturday 12th of March 2016 03:45:16 PM

I guess you raced through my post and missed the bit saying what I would do.

I live in a place where gays have been a protected class for 40 years.

And what do you mean by the freedom to cornhole some guy is not constitutionally protected? First of all, that was a nasty comment, but pretty much what I expected from you. Par for the course.

Do you mean to say that all sex acts should abide by the Constitution, somehow?

I read your Constitution. There was no mention of who should be having sex with who and how.

huskerbb · Guru

You are right--sex acts are not protected. Exactly what I said.

huskerbb · Guru

That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

huskerbb wrote:
That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.

I swear, if I had a nickel for every time I heard that tripe, I could retire...

flan

huskerbb · Guru

flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.
I swear, if I had a nickel for every time I heard that tripe, I could retire...
flan

Well, since it's absolutely true....

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Why is it important to protect a group of people because of something they are supposed to be naturally born with?

It's completely stupid to protect a "class of people".

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

huskerbb wrote:
flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.
I swear, if I had a nickel for every time I heard that tripe, I could retire...
flan
Well, since it's absolutely true....

I could agree with you...but then we'd both be wrong...

flan

huskerbb · Guru

You've proven it over and over again with your words. Any speech you disagree with you want shut down.

You are completely against religious freedom.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Saturday 12th of March 2016 04:25:23 PM

Nobody Just Nobody · Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

lilyofcourse wrote:
Why is it important to protect a group of people because of something they are supposed to be naturally born with?

It's completely stupid to protect a "class of people".

Well, women and blacks are protected and they are born that way.

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

And sexual orientation should not be a protected "class".

weltschmerz · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.

That's the problem with Conservatives. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

These morons just passed a bill making it illegal to have oral or anal sex. That's right....get a BJ and go to prison for 15 years.

Michigan Senate Passes Bill Outlawing Oral and Anal Sex — Violators Will Face 15 Years in Prison

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/michigan-senate-passes-bill-outlawing-oral-anal-sex-violators-face-15-years-prison/

Furthermore, put up the Ten Commandments on state property and all is well with the world.

Adherents to other religions want to put something up, and their heads explode.

So much for your freedoms.

huskerbb · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.
That's the problem with Conservatives. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.
These morons just passed a bill making it illegal to have oral or anal sex. That's right....get a BJ and go to prison for 15 years.
Michigan Senate Passes Bill Outlawing Oral and Anal Sex — Violators Will Face 15 Years in Prison
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/michigan-senate-passes-bill-outlawing-oral-anal-sex-violators-face-15-years-prison/

Furthermore, put up the Ten Commandments on state property and all is well with the world.
Adherents to other religions want to put something up, and their heads explode.

So much for your freedoms.

See--you don't want to put up the Ten Commandments because you don't want speech you disagree with.

Although, why you disagree that stealing and killing and such are wrong is beyond me, but that is liberal illogic.

Thanks for just proving me right.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

lilyofcourse wrote:
And sexual orientation should not be a protected "class".

Thank goodness you're not in charge.

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
That's the problem with liberals. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.

If they don't agree with your religion or speech--they want it shut down.
That's the problem with Conservatives. They only want people to have freedom if they agree with it.
These morons just passed a bill making it illegal to have oral or anal sex. That's right....get a BJ and go to prison for 15 years.
Michigan Senate Passes Bill Outlawing Oral and Anal Sex — Violators Will Face 15 Years in Prison
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/michigan-senate-passes-bill-outlawing-oral-anal-sex-violators-face-15-years-prison/

Furthermore, put up the Ten Commandments on state property and all is well with the world.
Adherents to other religions want to put something up, and their heads explode.

So much for your freedoms.

See--you don't want to put up the Ten Commandments because you don't want speech you disagree with.

Although, why you disagree that stealing and killing and such are wrong is beyond me, but that is liberal illogic.
Thanks for just proving me right.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Did you have a stroke, and words no longer mean what they used to mean? I'm fine with putting up the Ten Commandments. As long as the Hindus could put up a statue of Ganesha as well. As long as the Church of Satan could erect Baphomet as well.

huskerbb · Guru

????? What do those things have to do with the rule of law? You must be daft. You aren't even comparing the same things.

Those things would be comparable to, say, a crucifix or a statue of the Virgin Mary--NOT the Ten Commandments.

At least try to pretend you can think.

weltschmerz · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
????? What do those things have to do with the rule of law? You must be daft. You aren't even comparing the same things.

Those things would be comparable to, say, a crucifix or a statue of the Virgin Mary--NOT the Ten Commandments.

At least try to pretend you can think.

ROTFLMAO!!

The Ten Commandments are Judeo Christian. If that can go up so can the other things I mentioned.

Maybe it's you who has trouble thinking.

weltschmerz · Guru

You seem to have difficulty understanding religious symbolism.

huskerbb · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
????? What do those things have to do with the rule of law? You must be daft. You aren't even comparing the same things.

Those things would be comparable to, say, a crucifix or a statue of the Virgin Mary--NOT the Ten Commandments.

At least try to pretend you can think.
ROTFLMAO!!
The Ten Commandments are Judeo Christian. If that can go up so can the other things I mentioned.
Maybe it's you who has trouble thinking.

They are NOT COMPARABLE. How is a statue of a God comparable to written laws? That is STUPID. They are not remotely comparable things.

I knew you weren't all that bright of a bulb, but man, I thought you were smarter than this.

weltschmerz · Guru

AGAIN, for the slow........the Ten Commandments is a Judeo-Christian symbol.
If Judeo-Christian symbolism is allowed, then so can Wiccan and Hindu and Wiccan and Satanist. The entire gamut.