TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Abby: Brother Donating Sperm to Brother


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
RE: Dear Abby: Brother Donating Sperm to Brother
Permalink  
 


Ohfour wrote:

I couldn't imagine watching someone else correct my child, especially if it was in a way that I didn't agree with. What it the husband is TOTALLY against spanking, yet has to watch the brother spank his child in anger time after time. You wouldn't want to have a say in that, knowing it was your child?


 It wouldn't be your child.  Plus, the husband apparently doesn't have that issue, so it's BS the wife gets to decide for him.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


No where does it say that.  It actually reads quite the opposite.  That's he's afraid of his brother's reaction. 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


No where does it say that.  It actually reads quite the opposite.  That's he's afraid of his brother's reaction. 


 Then he can man up and say so.  He doesn't need his wife to get in the middle of it.  

If that's her only issue, then she's doubly wrong.  I don't get between my wife and her sisters.  She can handle that on her own.



-- Edited by huskerbb on Monday 21st of March 2016 05:10:07 PM

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?


So I shouldn't love my husband's children as my own?  I would do FAR more for his children than I would do for my niece and nephew.  And I do. This child would be just as much his as the ones he has now... 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?


So I shouldn't love my husband's children as my own?  I would do FAR more for his children than I would do for my niece and nephew.  And I do. This child would be just as much his as the ones he has now... 


 It wouldn't be his child.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?


So I shouldn't love my husband's children as my own?  I would do FAR more for his children than I would do for my niece and nephew.  And I do. This child would be just as much his as the ones he has now... 


 It wouldn't be his child.  


It would be as much his child as his other children... 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?


So I shouldn't love my husband's children as my own?  I would do FAR more for his children than I would do for my niece and nephew.  And I do. This child would be just as much his as the ones he has now... 


 It wouldn't be his child.  


It would be as much his child as his other children... 


 That's bull and you know it.  So every sperm donor's biological children are just as much his as any he raises??  Complete BS.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?


So I shouldn't love my husband's children as my own?  I would do FAR more for his children than I would do for my niece and nephew.  And I do. This child would be just as much his as the ones he has now... 


 It wouldn't be his child.  


It would be as much his child as his other children... 


 That's bull and you know it.  So every sperm donor's biological children are just as much his as any he raises??  Complete BS.


When they are part of the family and my kids think he is their cousin instead of their brother. And I have to see them all the time...



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

I couldn't look at a child fathered by my husband as anything other than his child. I don't think my husband could look at any child he fathered as anything but his child. You might be fine with that husker but you really seem to be the only one. I call BS on you. I bet your wife would have a lot to say about something like this.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Mary Zombie wrote:

Just because you don't think it's a lot to ask doesn't mean it's not in fact a lot to ask. And the brother asking should be willing to compromise and agree to Counseling and some of their terms if it's that important to him. So he should get his way all of the time?


 The donating brother in this case must agree with me, apparently.

 

should he get his way all the time?  No.  Should he get his way on an issue that IN NO WAY affects his wife--yes.  


But it does.  She may always see the child as her husband's.  I would do anything for my husband's children.  I love them unconditionally.  I would see this child just as I do his other children. 


 That's her problem in her deluded mind.  

I would do anything for my brothers' children, so what's the difference?  How is it a problem if she loves a niece or nephew?


So I shouldn't love my husband's children as my own?  I would do FAR more for his children than I would do for my niece and nephew.  And I do. This child would be just as much his as the ones he has now... 


 It wouldn't be his child.  


It would be as much his child as his other children... 


 That's bull and you know it.  So every sperm donor's biological children are just as much his as any he raises??  Complete BS.


When they are part of the family and my kids think he is their cousin instead of their brother. And I have to see them all the time...


 He would be their cousin.  I'm very close to my cousins.  We grew up together.  NOT A BIG DEAL.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

No, he would be their biological brother. You cant dispute DNA, right?

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:

No, he would be their biological brother. You cant dispute DNA, right?


 So it's only DNA that makes a father, now?  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Plus, any child would share DNA with the LW's kids, anyway--even if the brother was fertile.

 

Non-identical siblings have 99.95% similar DNA, actually. 



-- Edited by huskerbb on Monday 21st of March 2016 09:22:29 PM

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

No, he would be their biological brother. You cant dispute DNA, right?


 So it's only DNA that makes a father, now?  


 Yep. You either are the father or youre not. You can be an adoptive father, but you have only one biological father. Period.



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

No, he would be their biological brother. You cant dispute DNA, right?


 So it's only DNA that makes a father, now?  


 Yep. You either are the father or youre not. You can be an adoptive father, but you have only one biological father. Period.


 Oh, so all the adoptive fathers and step fathers aren't "real" fathers.  I see.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

You can have an unlimited amount of adopted fathers or step fathers. You only have one biological father. Ever.

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:

You can have an unlimited amount of adopted fathers or step fathers. You only have one biological father. Ever.


 So what?  DNA alone doesn't make a father.  We've said that over and over.  

 

All the adoptive fathers and good step fathers out there appreciate how little regard you have for their roles. 



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

You can have an unlimited amount of adopted fathers or step fathers. You only have one biological father. Ever.


 So what?  DNA alone doesn't make a father.  We've said that over and over.  

 

All the adoptive fathers and good step fathers out there appreciate how little regard you have for their roles. 


 Then the brother doesn't need the sperm - he can adopt.  His wife can go to a sperm bank.  If the DNA doesn't matter - then it doesn't matter.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

You can have an unlimited amount of adopted fathers or step fathers. You only have one biological father. Ever.


 So what?  DNA alone doesn't make a father.  We've said that over and over.  

 

All the adoptive fathers and good step fathers out there appreciate how little regard you have for their roles. 


 Then the brother doesn't need the sperm - he can adopt.  His wife can go to a sperm bank.  If the DNA doesn't matter - then it doesn't matter.


 He could--or his brother could give him the sperm.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

You can have an unlimited amount of adopted fathers or step fathers. You only have one biological father. Ever.


 So what?  DNA alone doesn't make a father.  We've said that over and over.  

 

All the adoptive fathers and good step fathers out there appreciate how little regard you have for their roles. 


 Yeah right. Im not talking emotion, I'm talking biology. If you cant grasp that, then you are just as cray cray as the ones that say gender is in the head. DNA is DNA, except when it doesn't  suit your agenda, huh? 

DNA DOES make a father. Every single time. Adoption or marrying a mother does not every time...



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

You can have an unlimited amount of adopted fathers or step fathers. You only have one biological father. Ever.


 So what?  DNA alone doesn't make a father.  We've said that over and over.  

 

All the adoptive fathers and good step fathers out there appreciate how little regard you have for their roles. 


 Yeah right. Im not talking emotion, I'm talking biology. If you cant grasp that, then you are just as cray cray as the ones that say gender is in the head. DNA is DNA, except when it doesn't  suit your agenda, huh? 

DNA DOES make a father. Every single time. Adoption or marrying a mother does not every time...


 So what?  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

So, it will always be the husbands son. ALWAYS. You cant sign away DNA.

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yup.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

But but but bros before hos every time. How can you argue with a grown man who thinks like that? Will any logical thing you say make a difference to this kind of thinking. I'd still like to know how calling your wife a ho makes you such a great husband.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Having a child outside of your marriage is a very real issue. And, the LW asked for reasonable consideration of going to counseling or whatever. And, her husband really doesn't sound to excited about this either. So, no and no and no.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Having a child outside of your marriage is a very real issue. And, the LW asked for reasonable consideration of going to counseling or whatever. And, her husband really doesn't sound to excited about this either. So, no and no and no.


 Counseling for what?  Ridiculous notion.  Counseling is worthless, anyway.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Having a child outside of your marriage is a very real issue. And, the LW asked for reasonable consideration of going to counseling or whatever. And, her husband really doesn't sound to excited about this either. So, no and no and no.


 Counseling for what?  Ridiculous notion.  Counseling is worthless, anyway.


 That's what most all mentally ill people say...



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'd still like to know why you think of your wife as a ho.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Having a child outside of your marriage is a very real issue. And, the LW asked for reasonable consideration of going to counseling or whatever. And, her husband really doesn't sound to excited about this either. So, no and no and no.


 Counseling for what?  Ridiculous notion.  Counseling is worthless, anyway.


 That's what most all mentally ill people say...


 Oh, you mean her.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tinydancer wrote:

I'd still like to know why you think of your wife as a ho.


 I don't.  Only women who would make a big issue out of this would be classified as such.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

So any woman who disagrees with you is a ho? Got it.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

you said it, not me.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Having a child outside of your marriage is a very real issue. And, the LW asked for reasonable consideration of going to counseling or whatever. And, her husband really doesn't sound to excited about this either. So, no and no and no.


 Counseling for what?  Ridiculous notion.  Counseling is worthless, anyway.


 That's what most all mentally ill people say...


 Oh, you mean her.  


Don't know where in the world you got that I was talking about "her" whoever she may be...

 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

husker never recognizes himself.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

you said it, not me.


No, you said it.  And you should be very careful.  You just called just about every woman here a ho.  You better tread lightly...



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

I'd still like to know why you think of your wife as a ho.


 I don't.  Only women who would make a big issue out of this would be classified as such.  


JIC 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

you said it, not me.


No, you said it.  And you should be very careful.  You just called just about every woman here a ho.  You better tread lightly...


 I said no such thing.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes you did...lol

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

The only one I used that reference in relation to was the LW of the original post. If you identify with that, that's your problem.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

you said it, not me.


No, you said it.  And you should be very careful.  You just called just about every woman here a ho.  You better tread lightly...


 I said no such thing.


Absolutely you did.  You will have no one to defend you on this one dude... 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

You said women that would make a big deal out of this are Hos. We've all said it would be a deal breaker for us. You just called us all hos.

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

Wait where's flan. She usually jumps in here to tell me how misunderstood husker is?

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:

You said women that would make a big deal out of this are Hos. We've all said it would be a deal breaker for us. You just called us all hos.


 if you infer that, that is on you.  The only one I used that reference against was the LW in the OP.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sure. That's what you meant. You're so funny...

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

You said women that would make a big deal out of this are Hos. We've all said it would be a deal breaker for us. You just called us all hos.


 if you infer that, that is on you.  The only one I used that reference against was the LW in the OP.


Nice, backpedal.  Nope.  You said what you said.  You did not say the LW, you said, "women", and that includes the women on this board that have POSTED OVER AND OVER that this would be a bid deal.   



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Date:
Permalink  
 

Allow my husband to father someone else's children? Hell no! I would see that kid as his child and I would be reminded of it every time we had family visits.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard