The presence of striking women has played a key role in Trump’s relentless quest to boost his brand — in real estate, in entertainment and now in politics.
After she joined Donald Trump’s real estate business, Louise Sunshine struggled to maintain a steady weight while managing her new career alongside the busy schedules of three young children.
Trump must have noticed, Sunshine said. She recalled that he kept an unflattering photograph of her in a drawer — a “fat picture,” as she called it — that he would pull out when she did something he didn’t like.
Would YOU work for a boss who based your ACTIONS on your WEIGHT?
flan
I knew you would pull this out. Except you ignore the part where she laughs about it and calls it a great idea! You don't get to determine what someone else should be offended about when you weren't there.
Yes, at the very end...kind of like a postscript.
And actually I CAN be offended at a man who uses fat-shaming in business.
You asked: So, what matters more - what you say or what you actually DO?
Do you honestly think that he insults women publicly, but actually respects them?
flan
He doesn't insult ALL women. Some of them don't deserve respect. Sorry, but just being a woman doesn't mean you get special treatment. Trump likes smart, capable women.
Only if they are also beautiful. He is not ashamed of feeling that way, either.
You asked: So, what matters more - what you say or what you actually DO?
Do you honestly think that he insults women publicly, but actually respects them?
flan
He doesn't insult ALL women. Some of them don't deserve respect. Sorry, but just being a woman doesn't mean you get special treatment. Trump likes smart, capable women.
Only if they are also beautiful. He is not ashamed of feeling that way, either.
flan
Those women in that picture are average looking and they are still working for him over 20 years later.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Trump does need to learn not to say everything that pops into his head.
He's like the amazingly talented doctor with no bedside manner.
Except making himself filthy rich, what's his "talent?"
flan
What "talent" does Hilary have? She's mooched off of the government nearly her entire "career".
What about Sanders? He hasn't done anything meaningful in his entire life. He hasn't even been a good Senator. In 26 years in the Senate, there has not been ONE bill that he has sponsored that has passed.
Trump is FAR more talented than either of those two bozos. If you don't think it takes talent to make money--you are daft.
-- Edited by huskerbb on Sunday 27th of March 2016 09:42:05 AM
He been in the Senate 9 years and the House 16 years.
2014 Report card has that 3 bills he sponsored were enacted.
Trump does need to learn not to say everything that pops into his head.
He's like the amazingly talented doctor with no bedside manner.
Except making himself filthy rich, what's his "talent?"
flan
What "talent" does Hilary have? She's mooched off of the government nearly her entire "career".
What about Sanders? He hasn't done anything meaningful in his entire life. He hasn't even been a good Senator. In 26 years in the Senate, there has not been ONE bill that he has sponsored that has passed.
Trump is FAR more talented than either of those two bozos. If you don't think it takes talent to make money--you are daft.
-- Edited by huskerbb on Sunday 27th of March 2016 09:42:05 AM
He been in the Senate 9 years and the House 16 years.
2014 Report card has that 3 bills he sponsored were enacted.
That's the three bills he got enacted in all those years.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
One of the main reasons Trump cites is that he's a businessman. He has already created jobs, he argues, so he'll do it on an even bigger scale as president.
So how many jobs has Trump created as a businessman?
One of the main reasons Trump cites is that he's a businessman. He has already created jobs, he argues, so he'll do it on an even bigger scale as president.
So how many jobs has Trump created as a businessman?
A CNNMoney analysis calculates at least 34,000 jobs attributable to the Donald.
It's not the most straightforward calculation. His company, The Trump Organization, is private, so it does not have to disclose information publicly about how much money it makes or how many people it employs. His campaign didn't give a specific figure either.
CNNMoney turned to PrivCo, which researches and tracks privately-held companies.
According to PrivCo, the Trump Organization has 22,450 employees and brought in $9.5 billion in annual revenue last year.
But that's not the whole picture. There are likely other jobs that might not exist without Trump. Economists call this the "multiplier effect."
New York's Broadway shows are a good example. Visitors who come to see shows, may stay at least a night or two at New York City hotels and spend money at restaurants and stores. So any analysis on the economic and job impact of Broadway takes into account more than just ticket sales and employment of actors, singers and stage hands.
The same holds true for Trump's resorts and hotels.
Consider Ricardo Ara, the 24-year-old who works in the Koi Soho restaurant in the Trump SoHo Hotel. His story made news last month because Ara is an illegal immigrant from Mexico who has the right to work at the restaurant in Trump's hotel because of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, a program Trump wants to end.
Ara is technically employed by the restaurant, not the Trump Organization, but his job probably wouldn't exist if the hotel weren't there.
The state of New York says that "leisure and hospitality" companies like Trump's typically have a 1.5 multiplier effect.
Using that multiplier, the Trump Organization is responsible for about 34,000 jobs.
This is a rough estimate. There are arguments to be made that it should be higher or lower.
Trump has acquired some existing properties, so one could argue he didn't create those jobs. He has also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy four times for some of his properties, mostly in Atlantic City.
The hotels were still able to operate in bankruptcy, but Trump Plaza in Atlantic City did close in 2014, costing about 1,000 jobs. By that time, Trump was no longer running the company, although he retained a small stake in it.
On the plus side for Trump, his name appears on many businesses he doesn't fully own, and he's been part of a successful television franchise with "The Apprentice" on NBC. It's possible to argue that he should get credit for some jobs in those ventures as well, even if they weren't part of the Trump Organization.
A more generous estimate would be to view the Trump Organization as a financial services or management company. Then the employment multiplier would be 3. That would bring jobs attributable to Trump to 67,000.
For comparison, a similar company Wynn Resorts (WYNN) has about 17,000 employees and $5.4 billion in revenue, and MGM Resorts (MGM)has 62,000 employees and took in $10 billion in revenue last year, according to FactSet.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
But looking at the content, other than a couple, they really don't do much.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
But looking at the content, other than a couple, they really don't do much.
I was surprised at the number of bills actually enacted each year. Anywhere from 300-1000, I hope most of them do nothing.
This session seems to be a push to name Post Offices. Out of the 150 or so bills enacted by the 113th Congress it looks like 50 were to rename a post office.
Indeed Melania isn’t just a great beauty: she’s proven herself to be eloquent and willing to speak up about immigration, and she is the only non-dwarf (sorry Jeb) spouse to have gone through legal immigration, unless you count Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
There are many jobs where a woman's looks are more important to the people that will be doing the hiring than any other attributes she could bring to the table, where a man going for the same job has little to no reliance on looks (other than being properly shaved, bathed, and attired for the job being sought). That's not hypocrisy, that's just the way the world is. Newscaster/reporter is one, "face of the company" is another, advertising is yet another, even something like being a waitress it comes into play whereas it wouldn't matter for a waiter. Is it fair? No. Is it how the world works? Yes.
And before anyone accuses this post of being anti-woman, women in positions to hire are equally as guilty of setting this standard as men are.
Well be honest, nobody wants Hatchet face representing their company to the public.
That might sound harsh, but you know it's true.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
People are hired on their looks all the time and not just women. It may be more prevalent for women but men are also judged on their looks. If you're good looking and qualified you'll go farther and faster than most.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Looks are part of hiring. I hire people for the School district. You have to come in looking your best. Pretty stupid if you don't. Yeah, doesn't mean you have to be a super model but you have to care enough to make a good presentation.
There are many jobs where a woman's looks are more important to the people that will be doing the hiring than any other attributes she could bring to the table, where a man going for the same job has little to no reliance on looks (other than being properly shaved, bathed, and attired for the job being sought). That's not hypocrisy, that's just the way the world is. Newscaster/reporter is one, "face of the company" is another, advertising is yet another, even something like being a waitress it comes into play whereas it wouldn't matter for a waiter. Is it fair? No. Is it how the world works? Yes.
And before anyone accuses this post of being anti-woman, women in positions to hire are equally as guilty of setting this standard as men are.
Now, that isn't to say that these women aren't or can't be very good at their jobs--but take news reporters.
Again, how many of them are really trolls? None that I can think of. Most of the ones who aren't, in fact, drop dead gorgeous are older women who darn sure were when they were hired.
You can't tell me that for all the jobs on all the various news outlets there isn't ONE hideous looking woman that had GREAT qualifications and should have beaten out the "pretty women" for the job. NOT. A. SINGLE. ONE.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Looks are part of hiring. I hire people for the School district. You have to come in looking your best. Pretty stupid if you don't. Yeah, doesn't mean you have to be a super model but you have to care enough to make a good presentation.
Ray Williams Ray Williams
Wired for Success
Good looks will get you that job, promotion and raise
Beautiful people have the advantage in the workplace
Posted Sep 03, 2011
SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL
MORE
Despite the sophisticated HR advances in hiring and compensation practices, it appears your appearance, and particularly good looks, still matter.
One expert, Catherine Hakim, a professor of sociology at the London School of Economics, and author of the book, Erotic Capital: The Power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom even suggests that professional women should use their "erotic capital" - beauty, sex appeal, charm, dress sense, liveliness, and fitness - to get ahead at work. Hakim is an expert on women's employment and theories of female status in society.
According to Hakim, the ''beauty premium'' is an important economic factor in our careers, citing a U.S. survey that found good-looking lawyers earn between 10 and 12 per cent more than less good-looking colleagues. Moreover, she says, an attractive person is more likely to land a job in the first place, and then be promoted. "Meritocracies are supposed to champion intelligence, qualifications, and experience. But physical and social attractiveness deliver substantial benefits in all social interaction - making a person more persuasive, able to secure the co-operation of colleagues, attract customers and sell products," she writes in a column for a London newspaper (link is external).
Other research (link is external) has shown that individuals tend to find attractive people more intelligent, friendly and competent than less attractive people. A University of British Columbia study found that people identify the personality traits of people who are physically attractive more accurately than others during short encounters. The study conducted by Jeremy Biesanz, Lauren Human and Genevieve Lorenzo, showed a positive bias toward attractive people. "If people think Jane is beautiful, and she is very organized and somewhat generous, people will see her as more organized and generous than she really is," says Biesanz. The researchers say this is because people hare motivated to pay closer attention to beautiful people.
A second study by Duke University researchers John Graham, Campbell Harvey and Manju Puri found CEOs are more likely than non-CEOs to be rated as competent looking. The team found that CEOs rated competent just by their appearance tended to have higher incomes.
A Tufts University study by psychologists Nicholas Rule and Nalini Ambady found a random sample of people could rte the competence, dominance, likeability, maturity and trustworthiness just be examining the facial photographs of CEOs.
Finally, researchers Elaine Wong at the University of Wisconsin and her colleagues at The London Business School examined the faces of CEOs and determined that CEOs with wider faces had better performing companies than CEOs with narrow faces.
So it seems that physical appearance is a significant factor in the hiring, compensation, promotion, and competence of executives, as much as we would like to think it isn't.
Believe whatever you want but looks are very important in all aspects of your career.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
This is a message board. ANYONE can respond to ANYTHING.
Get help for your obsession, maybe? Or go make dessert...
flan
Oh wait. Am I supposed to bring other stuff into the conversation. Should I bring up your adultery every chance I get? Or maybe bring your family into it like you do?
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
I'm not a robot either. I have a husband and make him dessert. Still better than being an adulterist so don't bring up crap for no reason and I'll do the same.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―