TOTALLY GEEKED!

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

RE: S/O on abortion thread

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
Don't get pregnant.

Pregnancy is 100% preventable.

But people DO get pregnant. And they always will.

The Oracle has spoken.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

flan327 wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
That same line?

It's old.

Take birth control seriously and then we'll talk.

YOU raise the unwanted baby and then we'll talk.
There are no unwanted babies. And while I dont raise them, i am very instrumental in placing children in loving homes.
Oh, and there ARE posters here that have adopted and are raising children...
You really do live in a fantasy world.
flan

That would be you, dear. We place hundreds of babies a year. Never had one that wasnt wanted.

weltschmerz · Guru

Hundreds, you say? Thousands waste away in foster care, neglected and abused.

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
Hundreds, you say? Thousands waste away in foster care, neglected and abused.

So they should be killed....okay....

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

weltschmerz wrote:
Hundreds, you say? Thousands waste away in foster care, neglected and abused.

So, we should just kill them all because their parents suck. Got it.

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

And just think, if mom and dad had just not had sex.

But, you keep on with that "my body my choice" argument. It makes SO much sense. evileye

weltschmerz · Guru

lilyofcourse wrote:
And just think, if mom and dad had just not had sex.

But, you keep on with that "my body my choice" argument. It makes SO much sense.

Oh, for Christ's sake! PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS HAVE SEX.

Tinydancer · Guru

So because you have a baby that may not have been planned you can't work to support that child? Then give it up for adoption. Killing another human being is murder. Killing a baby is killing another human being. Unless of course that science you keep trying to use to make the argument for perversion doesn't count when deciding whether it's a baby or a blob of cells and can be killed with no moral dilemma. You explain how that is right or moral whether it's you doing it or some other woman.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
And just think, if mom and dad had just not had sex.

But, you keep on with that "my body my choice" argument. It makes SO much sense.
Oh, for Christ's sake! PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS HAVE SEX.

And millions of people manage to have sex without getting pregnant. Amazing how that works.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

weltschmerz wrote:
Hundreds, you say? Thousands waste away in foster care, neglected and abused.

Don't you know that abusing a living child is a much better option than aborting a fetus?

flan

Tinydancer · Guru

Fetus = Baby.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Hundreds, you say? Thousands waste away in foster care, neglected and abused.
Don't you know that abusing a living child is a much better option than aborting a fetus?
flan

Neither should be done. But it's not an either/or choice. The first is an excuse to try to justify the second. If they are going to abuse their kid if they have it, maybe they should just kill themselves, instead. That would get rid of a useless, abusive, murdering waste of air.

Tinydancer · Guru

So killing it is a much better option because if you'll abort your baby you'll obviously have to abuse it if you don't

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

I had NO idea. Yes, a fetus will eventually develop into a baby.

flan

Tinydancer · Guru

No a fetus IS a baby. You can't even call it what it is because then you couldn't justify killing it.

Ohfour · Hooker

flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Hundreds, you say? Thousands waste away in foster care, neglected and abused.
Don't you know that abusing a living child is a much better option than aborting a fetus?
flan

If you say so, flannie. No one here has ever said that.

weltschmerz · Guru

Tinydancer wrote:
No a fetus IS a baby. You can't even call it what it is because then you couldn't justify killing it.

A fetus is a fetus. An embryo is an embryo. An acorn is not a mighty oak.

-- Edited by weltschmerz on Sunday 27th of March 2016 07:13:16 PM

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Semantics

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Tinydancer wrote:
No a fetus IS a baby. You can't even call it what it is because then you couldn't justify killing it.

I don't have to justify anything. I've never been in that position before.

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

lilyofcourse wrote:
Semantics

Of course. An acorn is exactly the same as a big old oak tree.

An egg is exactly the same as a chicken.

Caviar is exactly the same as belugas and sturgeons.

All these things are exactly the same. Semantics.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Words ARE important.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...

Tinydancer · Guru

A fetus IS a baby. Killing a fetus is killing a baby no matter what YOU say to sooth your conscience and before you say "I would never do that but other women should have that choice" then you are CONDONING murder. Tell yourself whatever you must so you don't have to call it a baby.

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...

Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.

Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.

You're the Great Decider, like Bush.

You're funny.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...

It's called an analogy. It's often used in debates.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

flan327 wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
It's called an analogy. It's often used in debates.
flan

Then its a piss poor one. People that value life dont think of a child the same way they think of a chicken. Thats just ignorant.

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.

Meh, you've proven what you are. And humanitarians all over the world would be embarrassed.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.

We should thank our lucky stars that she deigns to hang out with the likes of us!

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.
Meh, you've proven what you are. And humanitarians all over the world would be embarrassed.

Lol, I'm sure you spoke to all of them.

Tell me, do you have the same arguments with your Canadian, pro-choice, pantheist friends? Call them names? Tell them they're ignorant?

Tinydancer · Guru

If they acted like you she probably has...lol

weltschmerz · Guru

Tinydancer wrote:
If they acted like you she probably has...lol

You mean....have opinions? Oh, the horror!

weltschmerz · Guru

Pro-choice is pro-choice, honey, regardless of how people "act".

Tinydancer · Guru

Pro death is pro death but that should never be the way to act.

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.
Meh, you've proven what you are. And humanitarians all over the world would be embarrassed.
Lol, I'm sure you spoke to all of them.
Tell me, do you have the same arguments with your Canadian, pro-choice, pantheist friends? Call them names? Tell them they're ignorant?

We actually have wonderful discussions! We were up til the wee hours thurs and friday, talking politics, religion, all kinds of stuff. Shes not bitter or angry like you. Matter of fact, I read her some of the more interesting posts and she said that she was glad I knew that not all Canadians were like you.

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.
Meh, you've proven what you are. And humanitarians all over the world would be embarrassed.
Lol, I'm sure you spoke to all of them.
Tell me, do you have the same arguments with your Canadian, pro-choice, pantheist friends? Call them names? Tell them they're ignorant?
We actually have wonderful discussions! We were up til the wee hours thurs and friday, talking politics, religion, all kinds of stuff. Shes not bitter or angry like you. Matter of fact, I read her some of the more interesting posts and she said that she was glad I knew that not all Canadians were like you.

B.S. You did not.

Anyway, If they're pro-choice, then they're murdering, soulless, selfish people, are they not?

Or does that only apply to people you don't like?

Such blatant hypocrisy.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

flan327 wrote:
welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan

I know, eh? The vast majority of Canadians are pro-choice.

Our politicians wouldn't DARE open up that can of worms again.

That, and socialized medicine, are verboten.

There would be riots, and the politicians would be forcibly ejected from Parliament by angry mobs with pitchforks.

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.
Meh, you've proven what you are. And humanitarians all over the world would be embarrassed.
Lol, I'm sure you spoke to all of them.
Tell me, do you have the same arguments with your Canadian, pro-choice, pantheist friends? Call them names? Tell them they're ignorant?
We actually have wonderful discussions! We were up til the wee hours thurs and friday, talking politics, religion, all kinds of stuff. Shes not bitter or angry like you. Matter of fact, I read her some of the more interesting posts and she said that she was glad I knew that not all Canadians were like you.
B.S. You did not.
Anyway, If they're pro-choice, then they're murdering, soulless, selfish people, are they not?
Or does that only apply to people you don't like?
Such blatant hypocrisy.

I did not, what? Have deep discussions with my best friend? Thats what friends do. It may be hard to understand for people that dont have friends, but really, its what friends do...

Awww...maybe she hit a nerve? Because she thinks you are bitter and angry? Actually, abortion didnt come up. I have never ever said she is pro choice. I dont know if she is or not. I do know that her passions are same sex equality and prison reform. Shes quite the activist on those subjects...

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan
I know, eh? The vast majority of Canadians are pro-choice.
Our politicians wouldn't DARE open up that can of worms again.
That, and socialized medicine, are verboten.
There would be riots, and the politicians would be forcibly ejected from Parliament by angry mobs with pitchforks.

I love that visual.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan
I know, eh? The vast majority of Canadians are pro-choice.
Our politicians wouldn't DARE open up that can of worms again.
That, and socialized medicine, are verboten.
There would be riots, and the politicians would be forcibly ejected from Parliament by angry mobs with pitchforks.

All.peace and love, huh Welts? You are the quintessential hypocrite.

Ohfour · Hooker

flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan
I know, eh? The vast majority of Canadians are pro-choice.
Our politicians wouldn't DARE open up that can of worms again.
That, and socialized medicine, are verboten.
There would be riots, and the politicians would be forcibly ejected from Parliament by angry mobs with pitchforks.
I love that visual.
flan

I makes me think of slaves and lynching.

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
When you compare a human to a tree, you have lost the argument. That is so ridiculous, it would be laughable if you werent actually serious. Just proves how little you value human life. My point has been proven. Human rights advocate? Thats a joke...
Lol! Sure, I lost the argument because YOU said so.
Just like YOU decide who gets to eat in restaurants and how YOU decide that Catholicism is invalid because the Pope is a retard.
You're the Great Decider, like Bush.
You're funny.
Meh, you've proven what you are. And humanitarians all over the world would be embarrassed.
Lol, I'm sure you spoke to all of them.
Tell me, do you have the same arguments with your Canadian, pro-choice, pantheist friends? Call them names? Tell them they're ignorant?
We actually have wonderful discussions! We were up til the wee hours thurs and friday, talking politics, religion, all kinds of stuff. Shes not bitter or angry like you. Matter of fact, I read her some of the more interesting posts and she said that she was glad I knew that not all Canadians were like you.
B.S. You did not.
Anyway, If they're pro-choice, then they're murdering, soulless, selfish people, are they not?
Or does that only apply to people you don't like?
Such blatant hypocrisy.
I did not, what? Have deep discussions with my best friend? Thats what friends do. It may be hard to understand for people that dont have friends, but really, its what friends do...

Awww...maybe she hit a nerve? Because she thinks you are bitter and angry? Actually, abortion didnt come up. I have never ever said she is pro choice. I dont know if she is or not. I do know that her passions are same sex equality and prison reform. Shes quite the activist on those subjects...

No, she didn't. Which posts of mine did you show her? Which "bitter and angry" posts? You're so full of it.

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan
I know, eh? The vast majority of Canadians are pro-choice.
Our politicians wouldn't DARE open up that can of worms again.
That, and socialized medicine, are verboten.
There would be riots, and the politicians would be forcibly ejected from Parliament by angry mobs with pitchforks.
All.peace and love, huh Welts? You are the quintessential hypocrite.

So are you honey. So are you.

Ohfour · Hooker

Any of them. Theres not really a disagreement on those traits of yours. It obvious even to outsiders...

weltschmerz · Guru

If they're Liberal and Canadian and Pantheist, then they're pro-choice. Guaranteed.
You shouldn't hang out with murderers.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
Any of them. Theres not really a disagreement on those traits of yours. It obvious even to outsiders...

It's obvious to those who hate her because she speaks her mind.

flan

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
If they're Liberal and Canadian and Pantheist, then they're pro-choice. Guaranteed.
You shouldn't hang out with murderers.

Shes not pantheist. I dont know where you got that....

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Ohfour wrote:
flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
welts,

Admit it. You are a disgrace to your entire country...

flan
I know, eh? The vast majority of Canadians are pro-choice.
Our politicians wouldn't DARE open up that can of worms again.
That, and socialized medicine, are verboten.
There would be riots, and the politicians would be forcibly ejected from Parliament by angry mobs with pitchforks.
I love that visual.
flan
I makes me think of slaves and lynching.

And plantation parties...

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

Ohfour wrote:
Any of them. Theres not really a disagreement on those traits of yours. It obvious even to outsiders...

Lol. For a Christian, you sure do lie a lot.

Which "bitter and angry" posts of mine did you show them?

Can't say, can you?