TOTALLY GEEKED!

Ohfour wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

If they're Liberal and Canadian and Pantheist, then they're pro-choice. Guaranteed.
You shouldn't hang out with murderers.

---

 Shes not pantheist. I dont know where you got that....

---

You said so. Or are these different Canadian besties? 

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

If they're Liberal and Canadian and Pantheist, then they're pro-choice. Guaranteed.
You shouldn't hang out with murderers.

---

 Shes not pantheist. I dont know where you got that....

---

You said so. Or are these different Canadian besties? 

---

 Absolutely I did not. If you can show me where i EVER said that, i will give you $500 American. 

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

If they're Liberal and Canadian and Pantheist, then they're pro-choice. Guaranteed.
You shouldn't hang out with murderers.

---

 Shes not pantheist. I dont know where you got that....

---

You said so. Or are these different Canadian besties? 

---

 Absolutely I did not. If you can show me where i EVER said that, i will give you $500 American. 

---

It was either pantheist or atheist. Why are you hanging out with murderers, Soulless and selfish murderers?

---

 So you are admitting you are wrong? Sweet!!!!!!

And I'm working on converting her. I'm getting there!!!!!!:)

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Sure, force your religion down your friends' throats.
I'm sure they'll appreciate it.

---

 Well, if she had a problem with discussing it, she wouldnt drive from Canada every six weeks or so to spend the weekend with me, now would she? 

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Sure, force your religion down your friends' throats.
I'm sure they'll appreciate it.

---

 It tastes better than what you are serving.

flan327 wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

Any of them. Theres not really a disagreement on those traits of yours. It obvious even to outsiders...

---

Lol. For a Christian, you sure do lie a lot. 

Which "bitter and angry" posts of mine did you show them?

Can't say, can you?

---

 ohfour doesn't lie.  What, can't believe another Canadian would find you offensive and sad?

---

 Never ever?

flan

---

The fact that she refuses to disclose which of my "angry and bitter" posts she shared is highly indicative that she's less than truthful.

"Oh, any of them" is hardly an answer.

It was only a few days ago. How hard can it be to remember which ones? It's BS,

Tinydancer wrote:

---

If flan or her friends disagree they're just speaking their mind. If Ohfour or I disagree we're being hateful. See how that works for her?

---

 No, I'm afraid I don't, Oh Wise One.

Semantics...

flan

weltschmerz wrote:

---

flan327 wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

Any of them. Theres not really a disagreement on those traits of yours. It obvious even to outsiders...

---

Lol. For a Christian, you sure do lie a lot. 

Which "bitter and angry" posts of mine did you show them?

Can't say, can you?

---

 ohfour doesn't lie.  What, can't believe another Canadian would find you offensive and sad?

---

 Never ever?

flan

---

The fact that she refuses to disclose which of my "angry and bitter" posts she shared is highly indicative that she's less than truthful.

"Oh, any of them" is hardly an answer.

It was only a few days ago. How hard can it be to remember which ones? It's BS,

---

 All it shows is how hard it would be to choose.  Except for the "let's eat" thread, it could be any of them.

And ohfour refusing to waste her time hunting up your own words that you are more than aware of does not prove her a liar.  It proves she has better things to do with her time than spend it on you.

flan327 wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

If flan or her friends disagree they're just speaking their mind. If Ohfour or I disagree we're being hateful. See how that works for her?

---

 No, I'm afraid I don't, Oh Wise One.

Semantics...

flan

---

 Wiser than you obviously because you just proved my point. Semantics...lol. Saying they're speaking Their mind when they're a friend yet hateful when you don't like them is not semantics. And you being a Librarian and all I thought you knew what that word meant.

just Czech wrote:

---

My niece's third child has spina-bifida. She is a bright girl in a wheelchair. I can not imagine killing such a beautiful person because she was born with a birth defect.

I also have another niece born with Down's Syndrome. She is a joy to the family and many others.

I'm surprised this thread is still going. No one is going to change their mind.

---

 I was thinking about that yesterday. I may start a thread...

flan

weltschmerz wrote:

---

OhFour, you called this angry and bitter! This! You can't be serious!
Kindly point out which bit is angry and which bit is bitter. It's laughable.

I guess people who are angry and bitter themselves, see anger and bitterness everywhere.

There was nothing angry or bitter about that meme, but please continue to see it everywhere.

Wow.

 

 

---

 Don't hold your breath.

I've already asked...

flan

Ohfour wrote:

---

And I explained it.

You MISTAKENLY believe that Christians do it for reward when you do it for the good of whatever, shows that you think you are better. Only people with very low self esteem (most usually bitter and angry) try to diminish other people's charitable acts.

---

 The meme is merely stating a FACT about atheists. YOU are reading into it because welts posted it.

flan

Ohfour wrote:

---

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

And I explained it.

You MISTAKENLY believe that Christians do it for reward when you do it for the good of whatever, shows that you think you are better. Only people with very low self esteem (most usually bitter and angry) try to diminish other people's charitable acts.

---

 The meme is merely stating a FACT about atheists. YOU are reading into it because welts posted it.

flan

---

No, I've seen it before. It's been around a while.  Welts didn't create it... 

---

The funny part about the meme is it is based on Bible passages! LOL 

Ohfour wrote:

---

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

And I explained it.

You MISTAKENLY believe that Christians do it for reward when you do it for the good of whatever, shows that you think you are better. Only people with very low self esteem (most usually bitter and angry) try to diminish other people's charitable acts.

---

 The meme is merely stating a FACT about atheists. YOU are reading into it because welts posted it.

flan

---

No, I've seen it before. It's been around a while.  Welts didn't create it... 

---

 Did I say that she did? Nope.

We have had similar discussions in the past about motivation.

flan

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

And I explained it.

You MISTAKENLY believe that Christians do it for reward when you do it for the good of whatever, shows that you think you are better. Only people with very low self esteem (most usually bitter and angry) try to diminish other people's charitable acts.

---

 The meme is merely stating a FACT about atheists. YOU are reading into it because welts posted it.

flan

---

 It isnt a fact about atheists.  it may apply to some but certainly not all.

flan327 wrote:

---

How much do I owe you for that priceless advice?

flan

---

 It wasn't advice.  I was stating a FACT.  

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

---

An embryo is not the same as a fetus, a fetus is not the same as a baby. Sorry, but it isn't. Just like an 8 year old and an 18 year old all have different rights and responsibilities, I would say so do the born and the unborn. Of course they are both humans, but your 8 year old can't join the army just because he is a human. We grant different roghts and responsibilities at different life stages all the time here, and I simply cannot justify to myself giving an unborn child personhood that outweighs the personhood of the mother.

---

 But everyone should have the right to live.

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

Christians don't do those things out of fear of punishment or hope of reward, either. Our salvation is by grace alone, not good works.

---

 But "Christian" applies to a wide range of people.

flan

flan327 wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

Christians don't do those things out of fear of punishment or hope of reward, either. Our salvation is by grace alone, not good works.

---

 But "Christian" applies to a wide range of people.

flan

---

 Christians are those that believe Jesus Christ was the son of God and was crucified for the forgiveness of their sins and salvation of their soul through grace, and not by works.  If they don't believe that, they are  not Christian, no matter what they try to call themselves.  That is the definition of a Christian. 

Cheerios4606 wrote:

---

After reading just the first page I am gonna vent. I swear threads are created or discussed just to start something with someone else here. Why do we do this people?

---

 Agreed. I have no idea why, but this seems to be a hobby for some board members. They just like to start **** and upset other people.