TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Toronto, CANADA - Man convicted of assaulting women in shelter after getting in by claiming to be transgender


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Toronto, CANADA - Man convicted of assaulting women in shelter after getting in by claiming to be transgender
Permalink  
 


Sexual predator jailed after claiming to be ‘transgender’ to assault women in shelter

TORONTO, March 4, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A biological man claiming to be ‘transgender’ so as to gain access to and prey on women at two Toronto shelters was jailed “indefinitely” last week after being declared by a judge a “dangerous offender.”

Pro-family leaders are pointing out that this is exactly the type of incident they warned of as the Ontario government passed its “gender identity” bill, dubbed the “bathroom bill,” in 2012.

Christopher Hambrook, 37, leaned on the ever expanding legal “rights” offered to people who “identify” with the sex opposite their biology. Under the name “Jessica,” he was able to get into the women’s shelters, where he sexually assaulted several women in 2012, the Toronto Sun reports

Court heard how one woman awoke to find Hambrook assaulting her on her bed. “Her tights had been pulled down past her bottom and her bathing suit had been pulled to the side,” court documents reveal. “She yelled at the accused, demanding to know what he was doing. He simply covered his face with his hands, said ‘Oops!’ and started giggling.”

Court also heard evidence of Hambrook terrorizing a deaf woman living in the shelter. “The accused grabbed the complainant’s hand and forcibly placed it on his crotch area while his penis was erect,” court heard.

The same deaf women reported that Hambrook would peer at her through a gap between the door and its frame while she showered.

Justice John McMahon imposed the “indefinite” prison sentence due to Hambrook’s long history of committing sex crimes.

RELATED: Man strips in front of girls in locker room, says transgender law allows it

Hambrook was a former stripper and escort from Quebec before moving to Toronto in 2009 and posing as a woman. While in Montreal he served four years in jail for a 2002 sexual assault of a five-year-old girl who was a family friend and for raping a mentally challenged 27-year-old woman while on bail for the first crime, reports the Toronto Sun.

The prosecution successfully convinced the judge that Hambrook’s out-of-control sexual urges put the public at great risk and that an indefinite jail sentence was the only way to protect the public.

“I am satisfied there is no reasonable expectation that a lesser measure would adequately protect the public from Christopher Hambrook,” said Judge McMahon.

Ontario amended its Human Rights Code to make “gender identity” and “gender expression” prohibited grounds for discrimination in 2012. The bill’s sponsors said at the time that the so-called “Toby's Law” would open the door to “social change” in Canada.

Family advocates argued at the time that the NDP sponsored bill would create a legal right for a man who calls himself ‘transgender’ to use rooms and facilities intended for women so as to exploit women.

The bill was subsequently dubbed the “bathroom bill” by its critics. Allowing a man who calls himself ‘transgender’ to enter a woman’s area has already proved problematic in the United States.

In 2012 a college in Washington state decided it would not prevent a 45-year-old man who presents himself as a transgender “female” from lounging naked in a women’s locker room in an area frequented by girls as young as six. Teenage girls on a high school swim team were using the facilities when they saw "Colleen" Francis deliberately exposing male genitalia through the glass window in a sauna. Police told one outraged mother that the university could not bar the biological male from the premises.

Brian Rushfeldt, president of Canada Family Action, told LifeSiteNews that Hambrook’s method of gaining legal entrance into the woman’s shelters proves gender identity legislation is inherently flawed.

“The Ontario law is dangerous. It is unacceptable that any country would allow a law which puts citizens at risk. It proves the law was ill planned and executed, and the government should be held legally responsible for these crimes.”

Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Coalition told LifeSiteNews that it “didn’t take a brain surgeon to predict that letting men into women’s bathrooms and other private spaces would eventually lead to sexual assaults.”

“I wish we didn't have to say 'I told you so,’ but Ontario's party leaders and MPPs were warned that the transsexual ‘Bathroom Bill’ endangered women and needed to be defeated.”

“Of course this lunatic law could only make it easier for rapists and peeping toms to prey on female victims while masquerading as ‘transgendered.’”

Fonseca called for a repeal of the law.

“If this dangerous law is not repealed, we will only see a rise in male predators attacking women in spaces where they deserve the right to privacy like bathrooms, change rooms and women’s shelters.”

Fonseca took aim at Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak for supporting the bill, saying that he should take “personal responsibility for the attempted rape of those poor women in the shelters.”

“Hudak cannot escape blame: He supported this nonsensical law.”

QMI Agency’s Christina Blizzard wrote in an opinion piece last week that women have a “right to protection.”

“This is a bad law that allows heterosexual predators access to women in their most personal moments. Extra care should be taken to protect at-risk women in vulnerable situations, such as homeless shelters.”

RELATED: Transgender ‘female’ MMA fighter gives female opponent concussion, broken eye socket

Ezra Levant said that the gender identity law in Ontario has made the province become a “magnet for rapists.”

“Instead of women being protected in Ontario, instead of the law protecting women, the law serves up women to a rapist named ‘Jessica,’” he said on his show The Source.

A federal version of the “gender identity” bill currently sits in the Senate after failing to pass its third and final reading in August after the Conservatives shut down Parliament for a summer break. 

Fonseca said that the federal legislation puts Canadian women at risk.

“We urge all concerned Canadians to phone, email and write Canada’s Senators pointing out that the Ontario version of this law allowed Mr. Hambrook to sexually assault two women, and to ensure that Senators do not make the mistake of granting legal cover to would-be rapists at the federal level.”

“Tell the Senators to vote NO to Bill C-279 when it comes up again.”



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm shocked! SHOCKED I tell you.

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

No way! It's not possible!

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

That NEVER happens!

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

The danger is a MYTH.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Propaganda.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.

__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 No, Tig, they are RIGHT. They've been RIGHT all along...

hmm

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah people get assaulted ALL the time. So, let's make it easier for them to assault people. Sounds like very liberal logic. Good plan!

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 So, let's just open the doors and let them right in?  Yeah, that makes sense.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 So, let's just open the doors and let them right in?  Yeah, that makes sense.


 They're already in.  This is nothing new.  That's the point.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 So, let's just open the doors and let them right in?  Yeah, that makes sense.


 They're already in.  This is nothing new.  That's the point.


 But men and women are SUPPOSED to be divided, when they open the door and just let the men in the women's rooms, they become an accessory. 

There will always be criminals, the point is that you don't do things to make it EASIER for them to hurt people.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 So, let's just open the doors and let them right in?  Yeah, that makes sense.


 They're already in.  This is nothing new.  That's the point.


 It's nothing new--so we don't care.  Got it.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Tignanello wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 So, let's just open the doors and let them right in?  Yeah, that makes sense.


 They're already in.  This is nothing new.  That's the point.


 It's nothing new--so we don't care.  Got it.


 We can always leave it up to Husker to make up things that aren't there.  At least it gives some insight into his perspective.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.


 Precisely.  It's an extreme minority and articles like this are designed to make people think that it happens every day - when in fact it's basic violence that happens every day regardless of gender.  Maybe we should focus on that.  Blocking transgenders from washroom choice because they might assault a woman or child is like barring men from being Catholic priests because they might be pedophiles.  In fact, why DO we still allow men to be Catholic priests?  Haven't they demonstrated their propensity to be pedophiles?  Shouldn't we just have female Catholic priests at this point?  It would be safer for the alter boys.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tignanello wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tignanello wrote:

People get assaulted in shelters all the time. This isn't really news. Women get assaulted by women, men by men, cross genders, children, etc. Shelters are understaffed dangerous places full of drugs. They are not safe havens and do not have bouncers. Skid row in my city is one of two places in Canada known as a hotspot for the Missing and Murdered Women investigations (Vancouver's Downtown East Side and the North's Highway of Tears). And the Pickton Murder trials. Many of those women were in shelters and murdered by men. They don't even need to dress up.


 So, let's just open the doors and let them right in?  Yeah, that makes sense.


 They're already in.  This is nothing new.  That's the point.


 It's nothing new--so we don't care.  Got it.


 We can always leave it up to Husker to make up things that aren't there.  At least it gives some insight into his perspective.


 More excuses.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.


 Precisely.  It's an extreme minority and articles like this are designed to make people think that it happens every day - when in fact it's basic violence that happens every day regardless of gender.  Maybe we should focus on that.  Blocking transgenders from washroom choice because they might assault a woman or child is like barring men from being Catholic priests because they might be pedophiles.  In fact, why DO we still allow men to be Catholic priests?  Haven't they demonstrated their propensity to be pedophiles?  Shouldn't we just have female Catholic priests at this point?  It would be safer for the alter boys.


 You missed the point.

We should not make it easier for the bad guy.

 



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.


 Precisely.  It's an extreme minority and articles like this are designed to make people think that it happens every day - when in fact it's basic violence that happens every day regardless of gender.  Maybe we should focus on that.  Blocking transgenders from washroom choice because they might assault a woman or child is like barring men from being Catholic priests because they might be pedophiles.  In fact, why DO we still allow men to be Catholic priests?  Haven't they demonstrated their propensity to be pedophiles?  Shouldn't we just have female Catholic priests at this point?  It would be safer for the alter boys.


Why stop at Catholic priests?

In a Baptist Church, the Pastor and Church leaders are often revered by members of the congregation, especially the young children.  It is this enormous power combined with the influence that the Church has over the lives of its members that creates such a dangerous atmosphere for childhood sexual abuse in the Baptist faith. 

Studies reveal that childhood sexual abuse is as prevalent in the Baptist Church as it is in the Roman Catholic Church.  Yet this denomination often has no procedures for tracking abusive clergy who are transferred out of state, for removing accused abusers from ministry, or for informing congregants that their officials have been accused of violating children.  Numerous Baptist clergy have been arrested and convicted for criminal sexual misconduct.  The absence of a central agency for Baptist Churches to report known or suspected child molesters has resulted in preachers moving from one church to another without their new congregation ever learning about the history of sexual abuse.

http://www.hermanlaw.com/practice-areas/clergy/baptist-sex-abuse

 

 



__________________


My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
Tignanello wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.


 Precisely.  It's an extreme minority and articles like this are designed to make people think that it happens every day - when in fact it's basic violence that happens every day regardless of gender.  Maybe we should focus on that.  Blocking transgenders from washroom choice because they might assault a woman or child is like barring men from being Catholic priests because they might be pedophiles.  In fact, why DO we still allow men to be Catholic priests?  Haven't they demonstrated their propensity to be pedophiles?  Shouldn't we just have female Catholic priests at this point?  It would be safer for the alter boys.


Why stop at Catholic priests?

In a Baptist Church, the Pastor and Church leaders are often revered by members of the congregation, especially the young children.  It is this enormous power combined with the influence that the Church has over the lives of its members that creates such a dangerous atmosphere for childhood sexual abuse in the Baptist faith. 

Studies reveal that childhood sexual abuse is as prevalent in the Baptist Church as it is in the Roman Catholic Church.  Yet this denomination often has no procedures for tracking abusive clergy who are transferred out of state, for removing accused abusers from ministry, or for informing congregants that their officials have been accused of violating children.  Numerous Baptist clergy have been arrested and convicted for criminal sexual misconduct.  The absence of a central agency for Baptist Churches to report known or suspected child molesters has resulted in preachers moving from one church to another without their new congregation ever learning about the history of sexual abuse.

http://www.hermanlaw.com/practice-areas/clergy/baptist-sex-abuse

 

 


 Baptists, however, allow female clergy.  Roman Catholics and other orthodox religions rarely do.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Replace all clergy with trans people.
It's much safer for the children.



-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 23rd of April 2016 03:19:08 PM

__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

download.jpg



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Right....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 



-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 23rd of April 2016 03:21:26 PM

__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Rigfht....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 


 No.

No one should.

But you are about as far from objective when it comes to religion as a person can be.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Rigfht....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 


 No.

No one should.

But you are about as far from objective when it comes to religion as a person can be.


So? I still have the right to voice my opinion.

Don't read my posts is they bother you so much. 



__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


 She was stating a fact.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Rigfht....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 


 No.

No one should.

But you are about as far from objective when it comes to religion as a person can be.


So? I still have the right to voice my opinion.

Don't read my posts is they bother you so much. 


 Yeah. You do.

And I have the right to call them what they are.

In this case, it's a chance to mock.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


 She was stating a fact.

flan


 Let's see how your statement holds up when it is a post you disagree with.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't see any mocking here - in fact, I brought up the comparison. If you are going to blame the act of a few individuals on an entire cohort than we need to expand our views. Priests are an interesting debate topic.

If a man pretends to be a woman to assault women in the bathroom we should not allow men who present as women into women's bathrooms = if a male priest is a sex offender we should not allow male priests because they could be sex offenders. However, we do not allow women to be clergy in many major religions, including those which have had major international sex abuse scandals dating back generations. And yet, this article which sensationalizes the act of one individual is used to make an argument that should apply to the whole.

__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

I take some of that back. The 'widdle feelings' part is mocking. But that is not related to the topic at hand.

__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Evidently, stating an unpalatable truth is "mocking."

__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

You're cluttering the subject.

ANYONE who assaults a child should have their genitals removed and lobotomized. Or just killed.

But the assertion was made that pedophiles and rapist going into women's bathrooms was a myth.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Who made the "assertion?"

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:

I don't see any mocking here - in fact, I brought up the comparison. If you are going to blame the act of a few individuals on an entire cohort than we need to expand our views. Priests are an interesting debate topic.

If a man pretends to be a woman to assault women in the bathroom we should not allow men who present as women into women's bathrooms = if a male priest is a sex offender we should not allow male priests because they could be sex offenders. However, we do not allow women to be clergy in many major religions, including those which have had major international sex abuse scandals dating back generations. And yet, this article which sensationalizes the act of one individual is used to make an argument that should apply to the whole.


 That is why the analogy works.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody is blaming the transgender- they are an extremely small portion of the population. There are less transgenders than there are sex offenders. This law is stupid.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

Who made the "assertion?"

flan


 Can't remember who you agreed with?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't have time to play games with you, Lily.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

I don't have time to play games with you, Lily.

flan


 Translation = Flan will never answer a question because she can't remember what she said before.

 

Tangled webs and all that.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Right....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 



-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 23rd of April 2016 03:21:26 PM


 NO ONE has supported that--or remained silent on it, as far as that goes, except for those involved and those involved with covering it up.  When the media found out, they were all over it. 

YOU, however, want this to be silenced.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Right....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 



-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 23rd of April 2016 03:21:26 PM


 NO ONE has supported that--or remained silent on it, as far as that goes, except for those involved and those involved with covering it up.  When the media found out, they were all over it. 

YOU, however, want this to be silenced.  


 Imaginary land again.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

You want to gloss over it because it's not "new".

More excuses.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

You want to gloss over it because it's not "new".

More excuses.


 If you're going to add to the discussion, add to it.  Don't just make stuff up to hear your own voice.  



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have to reject your patent nonsense.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

I have to reject your patent nonsense.


 confuse



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I don't have time to play games with you, Lily.

flan


 Translation = Flan will never answer a question because she can't remember what she said before.

 

Tangled webs and all that.


 Translation = Lily is blathering again.

And if you are going to call me a liar, have the guts to say the words.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I don't have time to play games with you, Lily.

flan


 Translation = Flan will never answer a question because she can't remember what she said before.

 

Tangled webs and all that.


 Translation = Lily is blathering again.

And if you are going to call me a liar, have the guts to say the words.

flan


 So you DO remember who you agreed with? 

 



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tignanello wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Tignanello wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.


 Precisely.  It's an extreme minority and articles like this are designed to make people think that it happens every day - when in fact it's basic violence that happens every day regardless of gender.  Maybe we should focus on that.  Blocking transgenders from washroom choice because they might assault a woman or child is like barring men from being Catholic priests because they might be pedophiles.  In fact, why DO we still allow men to be Catholic priests?  Haven't they demonstrated their propensity to be pedophiles?  Shouldn't we just have female Catholic priests at this point?  It would be safer for the alter boys.


Why stop at Catholic priests?

In a Baptist Church, the Pastor and Church leaders are often revered by members of the congregation, especially the young children.  It is this enormous power combined with the influence that the Church has over the lives of its members that creates such a dangerous atmosphere for childhood sexual abuse in the Baptist faith. 

Studies reveal that childhood sexual abuse is as prevalent in the Baptist Church as it is in the Roman Catholic Church.  Yet this denomination often has no procedures for tracking abusive clergy who are transferred out of state, for removing accused abusers from ministry, or for informing congregants that their officials have been accused of violating children.  Numerous Baptist clergy have been arrested and convicted for criminal sexual misconduct.  The absence of a central agency for Baptist Churches to report known or suspected child molesters has resulted in preachers moving from one church to another without their new congregation ever learning about the history of sexual abuse.

http://www.hermanlaw.com/practice-areas/clergy/baptist-sex-abuse

 

 


 Baptists, however, allow female clergy.  Roman Catholics and other orthodox religions rarely do.


 Baptists do not allow female clergy.  They allow female worship leaders and Sunday school teachers, but not pastors.  But because most of the Sunday school teachers are women - the men in the church do not have unfettered access to children.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Tignanello wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Tignanello wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

No. It isn't new.

Trans people have been using the bathroom of their choice forever.

It isn't those I worry about. They dont want to expose themselves.

It's the really messed up freaks I don't want in there.

Thats the ones who have a point to make or the pedophiles and opportunists.


 Precisely.  It's an extreme minority and articles like this are designed to make people think that it happens every day - when in fact it's basic violence that happens every day regardless of gender.  Maybe we should focus on that.  Blocking transgenders from washroom choice because they might assault a woman or child is like barring men from being Catholic priests because they might be pedophiles.  In fact, why DO we still allow men to be Catholic priests?  Haven't they demonstrated their propensity to be pedophiles?  Shouldn't we just have female Catholic priests at this point?  It would be safer for the alter boys.


Why stop at Catholic priests?

In a Baptist Church, the Pastor and Church leaders are often revered by members of the congregation, especially the young children.  It is this enormous power combined with the influence that the Church has over the lives of its members that creates such a dangerous atmosphere for childhood sexual abuse in the Baptist faith. 

Studies reveal that childhood sexual abuse is as prevalent in the Baptist Church as it is in the Roman Catholic Church.  Yet this denomination often has no procedures for tracking abusive clergy who are transferred out of state, for removing accused abusers from ministry, or for informing congregants that their officials have been accused of violating children.  Numerous Baptist clergy have been arrested and convicted for criminal sexual misconduct.  The absence of a central agency for Baptist Churches to report known or suspected child molesters has resulted in preachers moving from one church to another without their new congregation ever learning about the history of sexual abuse.

http://www.hermanlaw.com/practice-areas/clergy/baptist-sex-abuse

 

 


 Baptists, however, allow female clergy.  Roman Catholics and other orthodox religions rarely do.


 Baptists do not allow female clergy.  They allow female worship leaders and Sunday school teachers, but not pastors.  But because most of the Sunday school teachers are women - the men in the church do not have unfettered access to children.


 Hmmm.  My mistake.  I must have been thinking Unitarian.  No more male Baptist clergy either then.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Any opportunity for Weltz to bash religion.


Right....I should remain silent on sex abuse by priests. It might hurt your widdle feelings. 



-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 23rd of April 2016 03:21:26 PM


 NO ONE has supported that--or remained silent on it, as far as that goes, except for those involved and those involved with covering it up.  When the media found out, they were all over it. 

YOU, however, want this to be silenced.  


I was sexual abuse by clergy to be silenced?

You must delusional.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard