If you think that the answer to an unruly child is a good spanking, think again, say researchers from the Universities of Texas and Michigan, who after extensive analysis found that this form of punishment only makes youngsters more likely to be defiant and aggressive.
Their study, which was published in the April edition of the Journal of Family Psychology, was based on five decades worth of research involving more than 160,000 children. They are calling it the most extensive scientific investigations into the spanking issue, and one of the few to look specifically at spanking rather than grouping it with other forms of physical discipline.
“Our analysis focuses on what most Americans would recognize as spanking and not on potentially abusive behaviors,” lead author Elizabeth Gershoff, an associate professor of human development and family sciences at the University of Texas, said in a statement Monday. “We found that spanking was associated with unintended detrimental outcomes and was not associated with more immediate or long-term compliance, which are parents' intended outcomes when they discipline their children.”
In fact, Gershoff and co-author Andrew Grogan-Kaylor, an associate professor at the University of Michigan School of Social Work, found that the more frequently that children are spanked, the higher the risk that those kids will start to defy their parents, become aggressive, experience mental health issues, exhibit anti-social behaviors, and/or develop cognitive difficulties.
Negative outcomes of spanking comparable to child abuse
As part of their meta-analysis, Gershoff and Grogan-Kaylor looked at the association between spanking (defined for their study as an open-handed smack of a child’s bottom or extremities) and 17 potential detrimental outcomes. They found a significant link between the punishment and 13 of the 17 outcomes, suggesting that spanking ends up doing more harm than good.
“The upshot of the study is that spanking increases the likelihood of a wide variety of undesired outcomes for children,” said Grogan-Kaylor. “Spanking thus does the opposite of what parents usually want it to do.”
He and Gershoff also found that children who were spanked were also more likely to use physical punishment with their own children, demonstrating how attitudes regarding such disciplinary methods tend to be passed from one generation to the next. Furthermore, they noted that spanking was associated with the same adverse outcomes in children as physical abuse, and both were nearly similar in terms of outcome strength.
“We as a society think of spanking and physical abuse as distinct behaviors. Yet our research shows that spanking is linked with the same negative child outcomes as abuse, just to a slightly lesser degree,” explained Gershoff. “We hope that our study can help educate parents about the potential harms of spanking and prompt them to try positive and non-punitive forms of discipline.”
-----
Read more at http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1113413810/spanking-defiance-health-discipline-042616/#s8IxI39E7W1kV3i8.99
I thought this would make for an interesting discussion.
-- Edited by NAOW on Tuesday 26th of April 2016 10:46:05 PM
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Well, I got a few spankings, but always along with an explanation of why I was getting one... Tended to not repeat the behavior that caused the spanking... Just saying.
If a child has no fear of consequences, the child rules the home. And THAT is not a good thing.
I call BS on this left leaning "study". Maybe they should have studied all the teenagers and young adults in detention centers/prisons first. Those individuals are there because of the lack of discipline and self control they should have learned from their parents. Good parents (those who don't spank) also have kids in those places.
Don't forget, the Sandyhook killer came from a "good" family that did not believe in spanking if I remember right.
__________________
I drink coffee so I don't kill you.
I quilt so I don't kill you.
Do you see a theme?
Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.
If a child has no fear of consequences, the child rules the home. And THAT is not a good thing.
I call BS on this left leaning "study". Maybe they should have studied all the teenagers and young adults in detention centers/prisons first. Those individuals are there because of the lack of discipline and self control they should have learned from their parents. Good parents (those who don't spank) also have kids in those places.
Don't forget, the Sandyhook killer came from a "good" family that did not believe in spanking if I remember right.
My children always had consequences for their behavior.
And no matter how much you spank a mentally ill person, that doesn't change the way their mind is wired.
flan
-- Edited by flan327 on Wednesday 27th of April 2016 11:12:43 AM
If a child has no fear of consequences, the child rules the home. And THAT is not a good thing.
I call BS on this left leaning "study". Maybe they should have studied all the teenagers and young adults in detention centers/prisons first. Those individuals are there because of the lack of discipline and self control they should have learned from their parents. Good parents (those who don't spank) also have kids in those places.
Don't forget, the Sandyhook killer came from a "good" family that did not believe in spanking if I remember right.
My children always had consequences for their behavior.
And no matter how much you spank a mentally ill person, that doesn't change the way their mind is wired.
flan
-- Edited by flan327 on Wednesday 27th of April 2016 11:12:43
Oh FFS, not every child is mentally ill.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I don't think you need to hit your children. I never hit my children and they have turned out to be lovely human beings that I am very proud of.
In terms of whether parental aggression (spanking) decreases aggression in the child, the answer is no. In fact, spanking tends to increase child aggression. “Spanking predicted increases in children’s aggression over and above initial levels [of aggressive behavior]” and “in none of these longitudinal studies did spanking predict reductions in children’s aggression over time” (p. 134). Instead, spanking predicted increases in children’s aggression. www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201309/research-spanking-it-s-bad-all-kids
I don't think you need to hit your children. I never hit my children and they have turned out to be lovely human beings that I am very proud of.
In terms of whether parental aggression (spanking) decreases aggression in the child, the answer is no. In fact, spanking tends to increase child aggression. “Spanking predicted increases in children’s aggression over and above initial levels [of aggressive behavior]” and “in none of these longitudinal studies did spanking predict reductions in children’s aggression over time” (p. 134). Instead, spanking predicted increases in children’s aggression. www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201309/research-spanking-it-s-bad-all-kids
More nonsense.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
DD12 was surprised the other day. She said she had never been spanked, and I immediately corrected her. She most certainly was spanked when it was warranted (I didn't spank for much). But since about age 4, I've never had to spank her - she learned. But she doesn't even remember it, let alone is she scarred by it.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
If a child has no fear of consequences, the child rules the home. And THAT is not a good thing.
I call BS on this left leaning "study". Maybe they should have studied all the teenagers and young adults in detention centers/prisons first. Those individuals are there because of the lack of discipline and self control they should have learned from their parents. Good parents (those who don't spank) also have kids in those places.
Don't forget, the Sandyhook killer came from a "good" family that did not believe in spanking if I remember right.
My children always had consequences for their behavior.
And no matter how much you spank a mentally ill person, that doesn't change the way their mind is wired.
flan
-- Edited by flan327 on Wednesday 27th of April 2016 11:12:43
Oh FFS, not every child is mentally ill.
Czech mentioned Sandy Hook, which is WHY I made that comment.
A well place pop on the bottom can make a strong point.
Slapping a hand away as it reached for something hot or dangerous makes a strong point too.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
A well place pop on the bottom can make a strong point.
Slapping a hand away as it reached for something hot or dangerous makes a strong point too.
Hit, spank...same thing IMO. but if it makes you feel better say spank.
Just because you don't understand the difference doesn't mean the rest of us don't. There's even a legal differentiation when it comes to hitting your kids vs spanking your kids.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
You are quite right, I don't see a difference between hitting and spanking.
If you do and it makes you feel okay about hitting your children, who am I to judge. :)
Also the legality of corporal punishment varies quite a bit so I would not be so bold as to assume the legal differentiation is consistent or in favour of hitting children.
The line for what constitutes illegal behavior when it comes to parents striking their children is subject to different rules throughout your country.
When I tried grounding Jesse, he just said he didn't care. It never phased him. He was perfectly content.
Giving him extra chores didn't work either. He just didn't care.
But pop his bottom and he took notice.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
When I tried grounding Jesse, he just said he didn't care. It never phased him. He was perfectly content.
Giving him extra chores didn't work either. He just didn't care.
But pop his bottom and he took notice.
You need to take everything away for a short period of time. The length of that depends on the infraction. And by everything, that means TV/Music/Cell Phone/Car/Computer/Video Games. It's called a TEASPOT. Google teaspot discipline. It's very effective for teens and older kids.
When I tried grounding Jesse, he just said he didn't care. It never phased him. He was perfectly content.
Giving him extra chores didn't work either. He just didn't care.
But pop his bottom and he took notice.
You need to take everything away for a short period of time. The length of that depends on the infraction. And by everything, that means TV/Music/Cell Phone/Car/Computer/Video Games. It's called a TEASPOT. Google teaspot discipline. It's very effective for teens and older kids.
I did. He didn't care.
I haven't had discipline any of my kids with more than eye contact since they were about 5.
Other than an occasional smart mouth, they don't give me any trouble.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Regardless of what many people think, you really can't "control" your kid... but you can control their environment.
I never wanted to control my kids.
I wanted them to learn to control themselves.
Actually, that's what I'd tell them. That was their warning.
I'd look them square in the eye and in a calm, quiet voice I'd say, either control yourself or I will, and you don't want me to do it.
They'd straighten right up.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
When I tried grounding Jesse, he just said he didn't care. It never phased him. He was perfectly content.
Giving him extra chores didn't work either. He just didn't care.
But pop his bottom and he took notice.
You need to take everything away for a short period of time. The length of that depends on the infraction. And by everything, that means TV/Music/Cell Phone/Car/Computer/Video Games. It's called a TEASPOT. Google teaspot discipline. It's very effective for teens and older kids.
I did. He didn't care.
I haven't had discipline any of my kids with more than eye contact since they were about 5.
Other than an occasional smart mouth, they don't give me any trouble.
I can't really say too much about their smart mouth.
They got it from me.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.