TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Why Dogs Belong Off-Leash: It's Win-Win for All


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Why Dogs Belong Off-Leash: It's Win-Win for All
Permalink  
 


 

I often have people ask me if dogs should be allowed off-leash in areas where they are safe from harm. And, often tagged on to this question is a query about whether on-leash dogs are more assertive or aggressive than off-leash dogs. I wish I knew. Despite a great deal of interest in this question there are no formal studies to the best of my knowledge. However, the answers that come my way overwhelmingly claim that off-leash dogs are, indeed, less assertive or aggressive than on-leash dogs (some interesting discussions can be found here). 

A recent essay by Wes Siler in Outside Magazine called "Why Dogs Belong Off-Leash in the Outdoors" claims, "If the owners are responsible, the presence of off-leash dogs can actually make the outdoors a better place." My own observations and studies about the behavior of dogs at places where they're are allowed to run freely support this contention.

Because some people have written to me or posted comments implying that I am the person who wrote the essay about which I wrote -- I did not -- I want to make it clear that I do not agree with everything Mr. Siler writes and that "owner responsibility" and context are key. I do think that questions about off-leash versus on-leash dogs need to be openly discussed and it's clear that we need data about if and how the behavior of off-leash dogs differs from the behavior of on-leash dogs. 

People are usually more of a problem than dogs

Mr. Siler's essay is available online and I'm sure it will attract a lot of attention both from those who agree and those who disagree with his views. One point he stresses is that it's most often humans who are the problem, and the results of two studies my students and I conducted support this conclusion. In one of these studies titled "Interactions Among Dogs, People, and the Environment in Boulder, Colorado: A Case Study,” we observed that dogs really were not a major problem for wildlife, other dogs, people, or for destroying vegetation. We also learned that "Many more people reported seeing other people disturb wildlife (92.2%) … significantly more often than dogs (49.7%).” For more data on this topic please also see "Behavioral Interactions and Conflict Among Domestic Dogs, Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs, and People in Boulder, Colorado."

Human responsibility is critical as is enforcement of local regulations: Many people are lame when it comes to stopping their dogs from misbehaving

The bottom line in our studies is that enforcement of local regulations is critical for keeping dogs and humans in line. If someone chooses to let their dog run off-leash where it's assumed to be safe to do so, she/he needs to be responsible for their dog's behavior. This is not always or nearly always the case. In our study of dog-prairie dog interactions, we learned that "People tried to stop dogs from harassing prairie dogs only 25% of the time. A survey showed that 58% of people polled at Dry Creek (all dog owners) did not believe that prairie dogs should be protected even if dogs are a problem. Increased human responsibility would likely go a long way towards reducing existing conflict among people wanting to protect prairie dogs and those who do not." We also noted, "proactive strategies grounded by empirical data can be developed and implemented so that the interests of all parties can be accommodated."

I want to call attention to Mr. Siler's essay to a wide audience because questions about who behaves better, on-leash or off-leash dogs, are not going to go away any time soon. And, it also stresses the humans who choose to share their lives with a dog and who choose to let their dog run free must be responsible for their dog's behavior. I've heard numerous excuses when something goes amok, which is very rare. However, a few fines here and there will surely help to get humans to take responsibility for their dog. And this will be a win-win for all.

Once again, as in many other areas of dog behavior where myths prevail (please see for example, "We Don't Know if Dogs Feel Guilt So Stop Saying They Don't"), we need research on the question of whether or not off-leash dogs are really less assertive or aggressive than on-leash dogs. And, most importantly, regardless of what we know or think we know, and regardless of what scientific studies might show, we must pay attention to the specific context and to each individual dog and know just what makes them tick, because there are rampant individual differences among these fascinating beings that need to be given serious consideration. 

Marc Bekoff's latest books are Jasper's Story:

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201605/why-dogs-belong-leash-its-win-win-all



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

In general, except on the owner's property and in specially designated areas, or areas that are "wild" and no one else is around--they should be on a leash.

It's not necessarily that all dogs are dangerous--although some are very protective and some can be aggressive--but sorry, most people don't want your mutt coming up to them, licking you, possibly jumping on you even in a very friendly way. IF they want to meet your dog--they can approach you and your leashed dog.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Owl drink to that!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4799
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

In general, except on the owner's property and in specially designated areas, or areas that are "wild" and no one else is around--they should be on a leash.

It's not necessarily that all dogs are dangerous--although some are very protective and some can be aggressive--but sorry, most people don't want your mutt coming up to them, licking you, possibly jumping on you even in a very friendly way. IF they want to meet your dog--they can approach you and your leashed dog.


 All of this



__________________

Was it a bad day?

Or was it a bad five minutes that you milked all day?



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4189
Date:
Permalink  
 

VetteGirl wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

In general, except on the owner's property and in specially designated areas, or areas that are "wild" and no one else is around--they should be on a leash.

It's not necessarily that all dogs are dangerous--although some are very protective and some can be aggressive--but sorry, most people don't want your mutt coming up to them, licking you, possibly jumping on you even in a very friendly way. IF they want to meet your dog--they can approach you and your leashed dog.


 All of this


 Agree. Corgi is dog-aggressive. I always have him on a leash. In my old neighborhood, it got to where I couldn't take him for a walk because people would just let their dogs run free. They would be like "oh, fluffy is friendly!" Well, Corgi isn't. 



__________________

Faith makes things possible, not easy

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18704
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

In general, except on the owner's property and in specially designated areas, or areas that are "wild" and no one else is around--they should be on a leash.

It's not necessarily that all dogs are dangerous--although some are very protective and some can be aggressive--but sorry, most people don't want your mutt coming up to them, licking you, possibly jumping on you even in a very friendly way. IF they want to meet your dog--they can approach you and your leashed dog.


 All of the above.



__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard