TOTALLY GEEKED!

apple wrote:

---

Mellow Momma wrote:

---

VetteGirl wrote:

---

I don't even understand, animals can't give consent. Isn't that what rape IS?

And yes, I really really hate to jump on the bandwagon of generalizing liberals but it does seem like it's hard for them to defend the "lifestyle choice"logic that is being thrown around.

---

 Well animals can not articulate choices nor can they enter into agreements. So it would be rape in every case with an animal. Not sure why you think liberals are for bestiality. I think liberals are actually for the protection of those who cannot advocate for themselves, like the developmentally disabled, children, etc. 

---

 I agree.

---

Conservatives aren't the ones wanting to legalize all sorts of perversions.  That would be the libs... 

Ohfour wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Mellow Momma wrote:

---

VetteGirl wrote:

---

I don't even understand, animals can't give consent. Isn't that what rape IS?

And yes, I really really hate to jump on the bandwagon of generalizing liberals but it does seem like it's hard for them to defend the "lifestyle choice"logic that is being thrown around.

---

 Well animals can not articulate choices nor can they enter into agreements. So it would be rape in every case with an animal. Not sure why you think liberals are for bestiality. I think liberals are actually for the protection of those who cannot advocate for themselves, like the developmentally disabled, children, etc. 

---

 I agree.

---

Conservatives aren't the ones wanting to legalize all sorts of perversions.  That would be the libs... 

---

 And you have 3 Liberals disagreeing with you.

flan

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Mellow Momma wrote:

---

VetteGirl wrote:

---

I don't even understand, animals can't give consent. Isn't that what rape IS?

And yes, I really really hate to jump on the bandwagon of generalizing liberals but it does seem like it's hard for them to defend the "lifestyle choice"logic that is being thrown around.

---

 Well animals can not articulate choices nor can they enter into agreements. So it would be rape in every case with an animal. Not sure why you think liberals are for bestiality. I think liberals are actually for the protection of those who cannot advocate for themselves, like the developmentally disabled, children, etc. 

---

 I agree.

---

Conservatives aren't the ones wanting to legalize all sorts of perversions.  That would be the libs... 

---

 And you have 3 Liberals disagreeing with you.

flan

---

Then you disagree with your party platform.  The liberals are the ones pushing these through.  You want to be lumped in with them, go right ahead, but don't think you aren't judged because of the pack you run with ... 

Tinydancer wrote:

---

But libs are the ones who think everyone should be free to do and be whatever they want.

---

 Really? ANYTHING...wow thats just weird.

apple wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

But libs are the ones who think everyone should be free to do and be whatever they want.

---

 Really? ANYTHING...wow thats just weird.

---

 Consider the source.

flan

Ohfour wrote:

---

flan327 wrote:

---

Oh, I judge you by YOUR "pack" as well!

flan

---

My pack is not wanting to make it legal to fornicate with animals... 

---

 Then you can sleep tonight with a clear conscience...as will I.

flan

Tinydancer wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

But libs are the ones who think everyone should be free to do and be whatever they want.

---

 Really? ANYTHING...wow thats just weird.

---

 Well if you're a guy but think you're a woman that's ok. It seems the more perverted the more you champion.

---

 I'm just glad penetration was addressed, what a weird world.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

So, how much longer till pedophilia becomes "a lifestyle"?

5 maybe 10 years.

If that long.

---

 It already is. NAMBLA, I believe it's called.

---

 Yes. 

But I mean how long till it's acceptable among the masses? 

 

---

 ummm... never? 

Sex between consenting adults is just fine. There is no consent with a child, there never will be. Children are protected and always will be in this country. 

Tinydancer wrote:

---

Well pedophiles can't help it because they were born that way. There was a study done where there were anomalies in their brain scans. Much like transgenders> major sarcasm

---

 I'm not sure what that has to do with how we protect minors.

Tinydancer wrote:

---

Well pedophiles can't help it because they were born that way. There was a study done where there were anomalies in their brain scans. Much like transgenders> major sarcasm

---

 Aside from anomalies in brain scans, it's disingenuous to compare pedophiles to transgenders. Transgenders (unless they're also pedophiles) don't desire sex with children. But yes, both are born that way.

apple wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

Well pedophiles can't help it because they were born that way. There was a study done where there were anomalies in their brain scans. Much like transgenders> major sarcasm

---

 I'm not sure what that has to do with how we protect minors.

 

---

Well that's just silly.  I mean, why do minors get protection over someone with a mental disorder.  Should their well being be a consideration too?   

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

So, how much longer till pedophilia becomes "a lifestyle"?

5 maybe 10 years.

If that long.

---

 It already is. NAMBLA, I believe it's called.

---

 Yes. 

But I mean how long till it's acceptable among the masses? 

 

---

 ummm... never? 

Sex between consenting adults is just fine. There is no consent with a child, there never will be. Children are protected and always will be in this country. 

 

---

 Yeah. Ok.

The OP is about ANIMALS being used for sexual acts.

Now, it's been a really, REALLY long time since it tripped balls, but animals can't give consent either.....

Sooooo........

---

 Ya, animals are not humans, seriously.

chef wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

Well pedophiles can't help it because they were born that way. There was a study done where there were anomalies in their brain scans. Much like transgenders> major sarcasm

---

 Aside from anomalies in brain scans, it's disingenuous to compare pedophiles to transgenders. Transgenders (unless they're also pedophiles) don't desire sex with children. But yes, both are born that way.

---

 I wasn't comparing pedophiles to transgenders I was comparing their brain scans. Brain scans do not mean something is right. That's the argument for why I should accept that transgenders are just born that way and not that it's a mental illness.

Tinydancer wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

Well pedophiles can't help it because they were born that way. There was a study done where there were anomalies in their brain scans. Much like transgenders> major sarcasm

---

 Aside from anomalies in brain scans, it's disingenuous to compare pedophiles to transgenders. Transgenders (unless they're also pedophiles) don't desire sex with children. But yes, both are born that way.

---

 I wasn't comparing pedophiles to transgenders I was comparing their brain scans. Brain scans do not mean something is right. That's the argument for why I should accept that transgenders are just born that way and not that it's a mental illness.

---

 I wasn't comparing pedophiles to transgenders,  uh huh......

Tinydancer wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

Well pedophiles can't help it because they were born that way. There was a study done where there were anomalies in their brain scans. Much like transgenders> major sarcasm

---

 Aside from anomalies in brain scans, it's disingenuous to compare pedophiles to transgenders. Transgenders (unless they're also pedophiles) don't desire sex with children. But yes, both are born that way.

---

 I wasn't comparing pedophiles to transgenders I was comparing their brain scans. Brain scans do not mean something is right. That's the argument for why I should accept that transgenders are just born that way and not that it's a mental illness.

---

 I understood that you were saying why accept one and not the other when both are born that way. However, one of them is (currently, anyway) deemed disgusting and criminal whereas the other is generally accepted. That's why I said it's disingenuous to compare the two.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Beginning to look a lot like Sodom and Gomorrah.

---

 But will there be wifi?

flan

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

So, how much longer till pedophilia becomes "a lifestyle"?

5 maybe 10 years.

If that long.

---

 It already is. NAMBLA, I believe it's called.

---

 Yes. 

But I mean how long till it's acceptable among the masses? 

 

---

 ummm... never? 

Sex between consenting adults is just fine. There is no consent with a child, there never will be. Children are protected and always will be in this country. 

 

---

 Yeah. Ok.

The OP is about ANIMALS being used for sexual acts.

Now, it's been a really, REALLY long time since it tripped balls, but animals can't give consent either.....

Sooooo........

---

 Ya, animals are not humans, seriously.

---

 

Children have no real rights, either.

 

---

 Children are protected from sexual predators.  They cannot give consent.

---

 We'll see.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

So, how much longer till pedophilia becomes "a lifestyle"?

5 maybe 10 years.

If that long.

---

 It already is. NAMBLA, I believe it's called.

---

 Yes. 

But I mean how long till it's acceptable among the masses? 

 

---

 ummm... never? 

Sex between consenting adults is just fine. There is no consent with a child, there never will be. Children are protected and always will be in this country. 

 

---

 Yeah. Ok.

The OP is about ANIMALS being used for sexual acts.

Now, it's been a really, REALLY long time since it tripped balls, but animals can't give consent either.....

Sooooo........

---

 Ya, animals are not humans, seriously.

---

 

Children have no real rights, either.

 

---

 Children are protected from sexual predators.  They cannot give consent.

---

 We'll see.

---

 Oh my goodness, are you predicting that soon children will be allowed to give consent?

Ohfour wrote:

---

Oh my goodness, are you predicting that soon children will be allowed to give consent?

I think it won't matter. 

---

 I think it will always matter, I think it is one thing we will always agree on.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

So, how much longer till pedophilia becomes "a lifestyle"?

5 maybe 10 years.

If that long.

---

 It already is. NAMBLA, I believe it's called.

---

 Yes. 

But I mean how long till it's acceptable among the masses? 

 

---

 ummm... never? 

Sex between consenting adults is just fine. There is no consent with a child, there never will be. Children are protected and always will be in this country. 

 

---

 Yeah. Ok.

The OP is about ANIMALS being used for sexual acts.

Now, it's been a really, REALLY long time since it tripped balls, but animals can't give consent either.....

Sooooo........

---

 Ya, animals are not humans, seriously.

---

 

Children have no real rights, either.

 

---

 Children are protected from sexual predators.  They cannot give consent.

---

 We'll see.

---

 Oh my goodness, are you predicting that soon children will be allowed to give consent?

---

 I'm not predicting anything.

I'm saying that the perversion will snowball.

 

I'm saying every prophecy in the Bible is coming to pass.

 

---

 YES LILY, beat us over the head with that AGAIN.

flan