TOTALLY GEEKED!

And if I HAD said something like that, she would have brought it up long before now.

Funny how you can convince yourself that anything is true if you try hard enough...and HATE enough.

flan

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

They want to kill. That's what these want.

Go on, push that head further on up there.

At least I'm not defending them.

---

 WRONG, wrong and well .... wrong. Do tell me exactly where it is that I defended any terrorists? 

 

Terrorists wish to promote terror. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization/ the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal.

 

 

---

 Where have you defended terrorists? 

Every time you look for ANY other reason but the real one, is defending.

" he's mentally ill", "I don't know any", "if you didn't have guns".

 

 

flan327 wrote:

---

Here's another "message:"

Every country has mentally ill people. Every country has little losermen who are angry and want to beat their wife, lash out at their boss, kick their dog. The difference is that the US allows people to own machine guns that can spray hundreds of bullets a minute. Banning these for private use and confiscating every one of them would be a great start. The current loserman killer bought his gun this week, legally. (The GOP has made it impossible to even ban purchase by people on the terror watch list)

It isn't complicated. Making it impossible for these jerks to be armed with weapons capable of such carnage would have made Sandy Hook and Orlando both highly unlikely. Even with hand guns and rifles available, today's weenie would have been able to kill a few, not 50.

Assault weapons were once banned. Now with the pressure of the NRA the media calls the damn things 'long guns' rather than assault rifles and the Congress has made their ownership legal again. There is no justification of allowing civilian ownership of weapons designed for mass murder.

flan

---

 Let's think about this, logically. 

Name a terrorist attack that took place where the victims are known to be armed with guns, of any kind.

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

Yes, GT. We ripped you a new one for that comment.

---

 I thought it was against the rules to bring drama from other boards here.

flan

---

 Thats not another board. This is an extension.  Totally within the rules...

This isn't a spinoff. Same rules apply here as they do there. It an extension. Look up the definition. ..

Says the person who called me a "liar."

flan

flan327 wrote:

---

Says the person who called me a "liar."

flan

---

 Yep. I sure did.

You've called me a b-itch.