TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Car Talk - Picking the Smartest Line May be Dumb


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Car Talk - Picking the Smartest Line May be Dumb
Permalink  
 


Picking the Smartest Line May be Dumb

  RSS
driving tips, fuel economy
Dear Car Talk:

Is it worth cutting into the curves when driving on multi-lane highways? For example, when on the interstate system, can I save fuel by switching lanes to reduce the distance traveled?

-- Marcel

Sure. We all know that the fastest route from point A to point B is a straight line. And that's what racecar drivers do: If there's a right-hand curve on the racetrack, they'll go from the far left side of the track, cut the right-hand corner at the apex of the curve, and then drift back out to the far left. That's the straightest possible line through the curve.

You can do that on the highway, too, Marcel. But why stop there? You can make your line even straighter by cutting through nearby neighborhoods. You can go right across the lawns and through the back yards. Just watch out for those in-ground pools.

Theoretically, you certainly can reduce your distance by a small amount and save a small amount of fuel. But the risk is that you'll cause an accident.

Since each lane contains vehicles, changing lanes inherently increases the risk of hitting one of those other vehicles -- or having it hit you. And if you change lanes frequently and unpredictably (or if it appears to be unpredictable to other drivers), you make the risk much higher.

So you might save 17 cents' worth of fuel but pay a $1,000 deductible to your insurance company and miss six months of work recovering from a broken butt bone.

So, theoretically, is this a good idea? Yes. Practically? No. Not at all.


__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

  • First off, race car drivers don't take turns the way they do because it's a shorter distance, they take turns in a manner which allows them to keep up their speed as much as possible, which means approaching the turn as straight as possible. If they were concerned about the shortest possible route around the track, they would hug the inside of the track all the way around.

    Second, you might be able to save a few inches of travel on one particular turn, but you'd likely end up having to make additional course corrections to get into position for the next curve, thereby eliminating the fuel savings. Even if you did have perfect conditions and a perfect road, you'd likely save yourself only a few feet worth of distance.

    And even assuming you are wildly successful and save 500 feet of distance on a 500 mile journey, you're talking about .018% savings. In a car that gets 30 MPG, that's .003 gallons of gas, or roughly 3/4 of one cent worth of savings. If you drive your car 200,000 miles, you would save $3 in gas over the life of your car.

  • 1

    Ray is right about potential danger of course, but good drivers continuously scan nearby traffic, so entering a curve one knows when no cars are nearby. In that case it's fine to aim for the apex of the curve. As for gas savings, the distance saved doesn't matter, but race drivers aren't going for that; they are increasing the radius of curvature of their turn so the speed can be higher. For ordinary drivers, less braking and re-acceleration saves a lot more than 17 cents. Anyway, my 2 cents worth.

  • 1

    I've been known to do a bit of freestyle driving. Ignoring the lines and taking the path of least resistance just feels good. I rarely get the chance to do it on multi-lane highways, because I would only consider it if the road was completely deserted and that usually means late at night. More often, I'll do it a little on 2 lane roads. If there is nobody at all in the rear-view mirror and I have visibility to see far ahead, I'll cross the center line to smooth out a sharp curve.

    Since the traffic lanes are wider than the car ; the curves could be straightened out a small bit.

    If you're on a winding road, where these constant lane changes would benefit you the most, it seems unlikely that you'd be able to do consistently the necessary signaling to avoid a ticket from the local sheriff. So..... no benefit from lane changing.



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Mod/Penguin lover/Princess!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13089
Date:
Permalink  
 

ROFLMAO!

I love their answers! What a crack up!biggrin



__________________

Ohioan by birth, Texan by choice!

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard