TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Mick Jagger becoming a dad again at 72


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
RE: Mick Jagger becoming a dad again at 72
Permalink  
 


Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why is it selfish and irresponsible? The kid will have a charmed life.


 All the money in the world cannot replace the love and involvement of a parent in a child's life. 


 You get your kids when you get them.   So, not always under ideal circumstances.  Everyone has obstacles to overcome.  Would it be better to abort the baby?  Some of you seem pretty eager to this.


And no. You dont get them when you get them. There is no stork dropping them inside chimneys! You get them when you have unprotected sex. Children are a result of the choices we make! It's not a surprise! 


 She wanted  baby, she's having one. A baby that will want for nothing. Its better off than a ghetto baby, born for welfare money...


 Well the baby will want a father at some point and won't have one. Not his/her biological one anyway. 


 Happens every day...


 Just because it happens every day doesn't make it right. Murder happens every day, that's not right either. 


 OMG!   This is hilarious!  You compare HAVING a baby to Murder but deny that an abortion is murder.  LMAO!



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Your point is what exactly? She is having the baby of a billionaire. Food, clothing, shelter and much more. Duh.


 Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous. 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why is it selfish and irresponsible? The kid will have a charmed life.


 All the money in the world cannot replace the love and involvement of a parent in a child's life. 


 You get your kids when you get them.   So, not always under ideal circumstances.  Everyone has obstacles to overcome.  Would it be better to abort the baby?  Some of you seem pretty eager to this.


And no. You dont get them when you get them. There is no stork dropping them inside chimneys! You get them when you have unprotected sex. Children are a result of the choices we make! It's not a surprise! 


 She wanted  baby, she's having one. A baby that will want for nothing. Its better off than a ghetto baby, born for welfare money...


 Well the baby will want a father at some point and won't have one. Not his/her biological one anyway. 


 Happens every day...


 Just because it happens every day doesn't make it right. Murder happens every day, that's not right either. 


 So lets stop having babies because something could happen. 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why is it selfish and irresponsible? The kid will have a charmed life.


 All the money in the world cannot replace the love and involvement of a parent in a child's life. 


 You get your kids when you get them.   So, not always under ideal circumstances.  Everyone has obstacles to overcome.  Would it be better to abort the baby?  Some of you seem pretty eager to this.


And no. You dont get them when you get them. There is no stork dropping them inside chimneys! You get them when you have unprotected sex. Children are a result of the choices we make! It's not a surprise! 


 She wanted  baby, she's having one. A baby that will want for nothing. Its better off than a ghetto baby, born for welfare money...


 Well the baby will want a father at some point and won't have one. Not his/her biological one anyway. 


 Happens every day...


 Just because it happens every day doesn't make it right. Murder happens every day, that's not right either. 


 OMG!   This is hilarious!  You compare HAVING a baby to Murder but deny that an abortion is murder.  LMAO!


 No. I didn't compare having a baby to murder. I said that just because something, like murder, happens every day doesn't make it right. 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

I did not say "having a baby is like murder - it happens every day" Not even close. Try and follow a logical argument.

__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:

I did not say "having a baby is like murder - it happens every day" Not even close. Try and follow a logical argument.


I will when i actually see one!!  hmm



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Your point is what exactly? She is having the baby of a billionaire. Food, clothing, shelter and much more. Duh.


 Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous. 


 Look at Mick. He will probably live to 90. His child WILL have a 2 parent family.



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why is it selfish and irresponsible? The kid will have a charmed life.


 All the money in the world cannot replace the love and involvement of a parent in a child's life. 


 You get your kids when you get them.   So, not always under ideal circumstances.  Everyone has obstacles to overcome.  Would it be better to abort the baby?  Some of you seem pretty eager to this.


And no. You dont get them when you get them. There is no stork dropping them inside chimneys! You get them when you have unprotected sex. Children are a result of the choices we make! It's not a surprise! 


 She wanted  baby, she's having one. A baby that will want for nothing. Its better off than a ghetto baby, born for welfare money...


 Well the baby will want a father at some point and won't have one. Not his/her biological one anyway. 


 Happens every day...


 Just because it happens every day doesn't make it right. Murder happens every day, that's not right either. 


 So lets stop having babies because something could happen. 


 No. Let's not have a baby with a man who is 72 and has not up to this point ever been active in his children's lives. Make good choices. He has a long history to learn from. 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Your point is what exactly? She is having the baby of a billionaire. Food, clothing, shelter and much more. Duh.


 Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous. 


 Look at Mick. He will probably live to 90. His child WILL have a 2 parent family.


 IF they live together. And that's a big if. 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh, so you wont tell a woman NOT to kill her baby. But, you have no problem here scolding this woman for having her baby. Do you ever just step back and really examine your own opinions?

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Your point is what exactly? She is having the baby of a billionaire. Food, clothing, shelter and much more. Duh.


 Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous. 


 Look at Mick. He will probably live to 90. His child WILL have a 2 parent family.


 IF they live together. And that's a big if. 


 So, separated parents cant raise normal kids?  Or a single mother of a dead husband cant raise normal kids?  Hmmmm?



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Your point is what exactly? She is having the baby of a billionaire. Food, clothing, shelter and much more. Duh.


 Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous. 


 Look at Mick. He will probably live to 90. His child WILL have a 2 parent family.


 IF they live together. And that's a big if. 


 Does your oldest daughter live with both her parents?



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Your point is what exactly? She is having the baby of a billionaire. Food, clothing, shelter and much more. Duh.


 Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous. 


 Look at Mick. He will probably live to 90. His child WILL have a 2 parent family.


 IF they live together. And that's a big if. 


 So, separated parents cant raise normal kids?  Or a single mother of a dead husband cant raise normal kids?  Hmmmm?


 All those military families are screwed, too!



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know right!

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous.
- Mellow Momma

_________________________

I think that's oversimplifying things a bit, don't you? There are many children that would be better off had they not had a father present in their childhood. Ask any child that had an abusive or alcoholic father.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
flan327 wrote:
I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I think it's an incredibly selfish choice.

flan


 Why?  He knows how babies are made, his GF does too.  She obviously wanted one and he let her by not protecting himself.  He can easily financially support the kid. I don't think he is being selfish I think he was being unselfish by apparently agreeing to it.


 So a child will essentially grow up without a father? How long do you bet will he live?

I think it's an incredibly selfish choice. I don't care if all his other children are raised by nannies...

flan


 Seriously?  You are going there?  None of us have a guarantee on when we will die.


 But, the REALITY is that Jagger is 72...not 62 or 52. You do the math.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
flan327 wrote:
I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I think it's an incredibly selfish choice.

flan


 Why?  He knows how babies are made, his GF does too.  She obviously wanted one and he let her by not protecting himself.  He can easily financially support the kid. I don't think he is being selfish I think he was being unselfish by apparently agreeing to it.


 So a child will essentially grow up without a father? How long do you bet will he live?

I think it's an incredibly selfish choice. I don't care if all his other children are raised by nannies...

flan


None of us are guaranteed a parent. This child will probably have a father longer than some kids do...


 Oh, wait, let me think...You mean, like MY kids?!

no

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why is it selfish and irresponsible? The kid will have a charmed life.


 All the money in the world cannot replace the love and involvement of a parent in a child's life. 


 You get your kids when you get them.   So, not always under ideal circumstances.  Everyone has obstacles to overcome.  Would it be better to abort the baby?  Some of you seem pretty eager to this.


 You're NOT that dense.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:
burns07 wrote:


at least he's stepping-up and being responsible--waay more than can be said for all the thugs with the umpteen babymamas

doubt his kids will ever be dependent on welfare/support/scamming benefits either


 If by stepping up you mean writing a check...yes, he is doing that. There is so much more to "stepping up" than paying child support though. SO much more. 


 Not if you worship the Almighty Dollar...

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
flan327 wrote:
I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I think it's an incredibly selfish choice.

flan


 Why?  He knows how babies are made, his GF does too.  She obviously wanted one and he let her by not protecting himself.  He can easily financially support the kid. I don't think he is being selfish I think he was being unselfish by apparently agreeing to it.


 So a child will essentially grow up without a father? How long do you bet will he live?

I think it's an incredibly selfish choice. I don't care if all his other children are raised by nannies...

flan


 Seriously?  You are going there?  None of us have a guarantee on when we will die.


 But, the REALITY is that Jagger is 72...not 62 or 52. You do the math.

flan


 Who is arguing the math?  The "math" doesn't always apply as in the case of dd's friend.  So, not really sure of your point.  All we can all do is try to live our best life.   There is a baby on the way so you deal with it.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tangerine wrote:

It's a bit weird, but he was a good looking dude and obviously has pretty good genes. Plus, he can afford as many children as he wants to have. I can't blame either of them.

My first reaction was eww.


 I think it's irresponsible to have a child when that old, even if you can afford them.  I mean, male life expectancy tables says he's likely to die before the kid starts kindergarten. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1849
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Tangerine wrote:

It's a bit weird, but he was a good looking dude and obviously has pretty good genes. Plus, he can afford as many children as he wants to have. I can't blame either of them.

My first reaction was eww.


 I think it's irresponsible to have a child when that old, even if you can afford them.  I mean, male life expectancy tables says he's likely to die before the kid starts kindergarten. 


 True. But I really think this lady must have considered that and the fact that he hasn't been an active parent to his other children. 

At least this baby will be well taken care of financially. Who knows, she may meet a nice guy to be his/her stepdad in a couple years. 



__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tangerine wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tangerine wrote:

It's a bit weird, but he was a good looking dude and obviously has pretty good genes. Plus, he can afford as many children as he wants to have. I can't blame either of them.

My first reaction was eww.


 I think it's irresponsible to have a child when that old, even if you can afford them.  I mean, male life expectancy tables says he's likely to die before the kid starts kindergarten. 


 True. But I really think this lady must have considered that and the fact that he hasn't been an active parent to his other children. 

At least this baby will be well taken care of financially. Who knows, she may meet a nice guy to be his/her stepdad in a couple years. 


 And the cynical side of me says she has now guaranteed herself a child support paycheck for the next 18 years and that her child will inherit well.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Tangerine wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tangerine wrote:

It's a bit weird, but he was a good looking dude and obviously has pretty good genes. Plus, he can afford as many children as he wants to have. I can't blame either of them.

My first reaction was eww.


 I think it's irresponsible to have a child when that old, even if you can afford them.  I mean, male life expectancy tables says he's likely to die before the kid starts kindergarten. 


 True. But I really think this lady must have considered that and the fact that he hasn't been an active parent to his other children. 

At least this baby will be well taken care of financially. Who knows, she may meet a nice guy to be his/her stepdad in a couple years. 


 And the cynical side of me says she has now guaranteed herself a child support paycheck for the next 18 years and that her child will inherit well.


sing it with me:

"now I ain't sayin she's a gold digger..." 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

For some of them, latching on to a celebrity is a meal ticket.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
Permalink  
 

WYSIWYG wrote:

Sigh. A child has better outcomes in life in a two parent family unit - regardless of income. Children need two parents. To say that because the child will have its financial life taken care of so he/she will be happy is ridiculous.
- Mellow Momma

_________________________

I think that's oversimplifying things a bit, don't you? There are many children that would be better off had they not had a father present in their childhood. Ask any child that had an abusive or alcoholic father.


 Exactly, many times a child is better off with one stable parent.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Tangerine wrote:

It's a bit weird, but he was a good looking dude and obviously has pretty good genes. Plus, he can afford as many children as he wants to have. I can't blame either of them.

My first reaction was eww.


 I think it's irresponsible to have a child when that old, even if you can afford them.  I mean, male life expectancy tables says he's likely to die before the kid starts kindergarten. 


 He can afford to do whatever he wants. 

He is physically able.



__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Tangerine wrote:

It's a bit weird, but he was a good looking dude and obviously has pretty good genes. Plus, he can afford as many children as he wants to have. I can't blame either of them.

My first reaction was eww.


 I think it's irresponsible to have a child when that old, even if you can afford them.  I mean, male life expectancy tables says he's likely to die before the kid starts kindergarten. 


 He can afford to do whatever he wants. 

He is physically able.


 Money is not everything.  And that physically able thing is not likely to last. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

For some of them, latching on to a celebrity is a meal ticket.


 Well, a 29 year old girl ain't shaggin' THAT for his good looks.  



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

For some of them, latching on to a celebrity is a meal ticket.


 Well, a 29 year old girl ain't shaggin' THAT for his good looks.  


 Speak for yourself!  Lol!



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

The kid won't starve. The kid will have more opportunities in life than your kid. I really don't care if he has 1 kid or 10.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

All the money and opportunity in the world doesn't replace having a father.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

All the money and opportunity in the world doesn't replace having a father.


 Of course not.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't recall anyone saying it did. His baby is on the way. What do you now propose be done?

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I don't recall anyone saying it did. His baby is on the way. What do you now propose be done?


 Nothing.  But I'm entitled to my opinion that it was an irresponsible, stupid, selfish, idiotic thing to do.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard