TOTALLY GEEKED!

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 I find it refreshing that she was not fired.  She offered Trump said no.  I probably would have fired her on impulse.  This political must get tiring for someone who isn't a life long politician.

apple wrote:

---

Melanias speech was a rip off.
Lets not acknowledge that and point fingers elsewhere shall we?

---

Melania learned from her predecessors 

Barack Obama: “Don’t tell me words don’t matter.” As then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) surpassed Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, largely on the strength of his oratory, Clinton said that Obama’s record was “just words.” Obama responded in a speech whose refrain was lifted from then-Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick. The Obama campaign did not even bother to refute the claim. Instead, it circulated examples of lines that it said Clinton herself had borrowed from Obama. The left media defended Obama, saying that he had not committed plagiarism, but merely, at worst, “poor footnoting.”

Hillary Clinton: “No bank can be too big to fail, no executive too powerful to jail.” After the Obama campaign accused Clinton of stealing lines in 2008 — a claim supplemented by The New Republic, which accused her of stealing lines from then-Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) —  she ought to have learned her lesson. But in 2016, she stole linesfrom Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who responded by telling NBC News’ Meet the Press, jokingly: “We’re looking into the copyright issues here.” Clinton was accused of lifting other lines, too — and Sanders supporters responded on Twitter with the wry hashtag: #StealtheBern.

Joe Biden: “My ancestors who worked in the coal mines…”. Biden was found to have borrowed heavily from the oratory — and the biography — of British Labour Party leader Neal Kinnock, without attribution. In addition, it was discovered he had committed plagiarism while in law school. The scandal helped bring down Biden’s presidential campaign in 1988 — though Biden’s angry outburst at a reporter — “I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect” — didn’t help, either.

Michelle Obama: “…the world as it should be.” In 2008, the aspiring First Lady was accused by bloggers of lifting lines for her DNC speech from Saul Alinsky. Alinsky wrote, in Rules for Radicals (emphasis added): “The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.” Michelle Obama said: “And Barack stood up that day, and he spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about ‘the world as it is‘ and ‘the world as it should be.'” (Perhaps Mr. Obama who left out the attribution.)

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 What is funny is how many people were saying "NO IT IS NOT THE SAME", when clearly it was. Even the writer admitted it.  I never blamed Melania, I just find the head in the sand type of responses to be pretty typical, sadly.

apple wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 What is funny is how many people were saying "NO IT IS NOT THE SAME", when clearly it was. Even the writer admitted it.  I never blamed Melania, I just find the head in the sand type of responses to be pretty typical, sadly.

 

---

 No.

What's funny is that libs care more about about a copied speech than national security, the deaths of Americans in Bengazi and the lies over all of it.

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 What is funny is how many people were saying "NO IT IS NOT THE SAME", when clearly it was. Even the writer admitted it.  I never blamed Melania, I just find the head in the sand type of responses to be pretty typical, sadly.

 

---

 No.

What's funny is that libs care more about about a copied speech than national security, the deaths of Americans in Bengazi and the lies over all of it.

 

 

---

 Bengazi, thats all you have? I mean what is anyone supposed to do about that? You have your opinion but in all honesty, its over. No charges.

 

ps.. ROYAL DEFLECT. :)

---

 How is that a deflect? 

It's part and parcel of the problem.

The emails, the lies, possible damage to our national security. 

You want to focus on a speech.

Not the criminal.

THAT'S deflection. 

FNW wrote:

---

Oh well, since Bengazi is over and there's nothing to do now, "What difference does it make?" Tell that to the families Hillary let die. And what about the growing threat of ISIS which occurred because of her and O's policies? Well, there's nothing to do now, so we might as well open the borders and make it easier for them to attack us. Because you know, we wouldn't want to offend Muslims.

And don't get me started on all the people the Clinton's had murdered to cover up their crimes....or the kickbacks they get through the Clinton Foundation.

---

 You know none of that matters.

There was a speech copied!

Priorities, people!

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 What is funny is how many people were saying "NO IT IS NOT THE SAME", when clearly it was. Even the writer admitted it.  I never blamed Melania, I just find the head in the sand type of responses to be pretty typical, sadly.

 

---

 No.

What's funny is that libs care more about about a copied speech than national security, the deaths of Americans in Bengazi and the lies over all of it.

 

 

---

 Bengazi, thats all you have? I mean what is anyone supposed to do about that? You have your opinion but in all honesty, its over. No charges.

 

ps.. ROYAL DEFLECT. :)

---

 That's "all we have"?  The days of lies over a video causing this?  4 Dead Americans?  Yeah, that's all.  But, but Melania's speech!  Do you even read what you type?

---

 You need a new shtick, this one is old.

Ohfour wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 What is funny is how many people were saying "NO IT IS NOT THE SAME", when clearly it was. Even the writer admitted it.  I never blamed Melania, I just find the head in the sand type of responses to be pretty typical, sadly.

 

---

 No.

What's funny is that libs care more about about a copied speech than national security, the deaths of Americans in Bengazi and the lies over all of it.

 

 

---

 Bengazi, thaets all you have? I mean what is anyone supposed to do about that? You have your opinion but in all honesty, its over. No charges.

 

ps.. ROYAL DEFLECT. :)

---

 Seriously?  That is THE most disgusting comment I've ever read here. I don't get angry often, but you have crossed a line. You make me want to throw up. That comment should get you fvckin kicked off the board. That post is shameless.

 

 

---

 Drama queen, pu leee ze!

Its the truth, sorry you can't stomach it.

apple wrote:

---

You two should write for the National Enquirer.

---

 Aww.. run out of points I see.

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

You two should write for the National Enquirer.

---

 Aww.. run out of points I see.

---

 No, just tired of your sensationalism and ignorance in the true sense of the word.

---

 Oh honey, I'm not the supporting a liar and murderer. 

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

You seem to be more bothered by a copied speech than out right lies.

---

 No, I think you are confused.

Read again what I said. 

Besides, I am not bothered by the speech. The speech has nothing to do with Benghazi, its what you throw out there whenever you want to derail conversation.

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

You seem to be more bothered by a copied speech than out right lies.

---

 No, I think you are confused.

Read again what I said. 

Besides, I am not bothered by the speech. The speech has nothing to do with Benghazi, its what you throw out there whenever you want to derail conversation.

 

---

 How?

At the very least, Killary has made some seriously poor decisions.

That alone says she isn't fit to run the US.

chef wrote:

---

I'd like to know what Hillary has done to prove she'd be a competent president.

---

 She is running on old school politics where she is "due".  Ha! times have changed.

chef wrote:

---

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:

---

chef wrote:

---

I'd like to know what Hillary has done to prove she'd be a competent president.

---

 She is running on old school politics where she is "due".  Ha! times have changed.

---

 I'm not sure what that means. She's somehow earned the presidency because she's been in the game awhile? Or?

---

 Chef, Trump is popular  because the majority of voters recognize the good ole boy network in our political system and we are sick of it.  Hillary is still running a campaign as if voters don't feel that way.  She says what you want to hear, lies to the nth degree, etc.  And thinks she is entitled to the presidency.  She hasn't earned the presidency but thinks she has.

FNW wrote:

---

I'm not sure anyone in the last few decades "earned" their right to be President. Not really since our founding fathers. Or Abe Lincoln. But that's the beauty of this country. Anyone can be President.

---

 I agree FNW.  The presidency and who can be on the ticket should not be the decision of the party leads.  The party should support and lift up those candidates that the voters want.

Ohfour wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

The speechwriter was a she...just saying...

---

 thanks. so now you see the "similarities" huh?

---

 The speech had word for word copying from a speech made 8 years ago.  

And I don't care.  

You really think Melania KNEW the speechwriter did that?  You think she studies all of Michelle Obama's old speeches?  

Do you know how speechwriting works?  The person tells them generally what they want to say - the speechwriter writes it all pretty like.  The speaker reads it.  

---

 What is funny is how many people were saying "NO IT IS NOT THE SAME", when clearly it was. Even the writer admitted it.  I never blamed Melania, I just find the head in the sand type of responses to be pretty typical, sadly.

 

---

 No.

What's funny is that libs care more about about a copied speech than national security, the deaths of Americans in Bengazi and the lies over all of it.

 

 

---

 Bengazi, thaets all you have? I mean what is anyone supposed to do about that? You have your opinion but in all honesty, its over. No charges.

 

ps.. ROYAL DEFLECT. :)

---

 Seriously?  That is THE most disgusting comment I've ever read here. I don't get angry often, but you have crossed a line. You make me want to throw up. That comment should get you fvckin kicked off the board. That post is shameless.

 

 

---

flan

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

You seem to be more bothered by a copied speech than out right lies.

---

 No, I think you are confused.

Read again what I said. 

Besides, I am not bothered by the speech. The speech has nothing to do with Benghazi, its what you throw out there whenever you want to derail conversation.

 

---

 Benghazi is a disgraceful, shameful, disgusting event for the Democratic establishment.  It should NEVER be forgotten or considered bygones.  People DIED.  But, I realize that if you can't defend it, you take up Hillary's horrid "what does it matter?" shtick.  And aren't you the one that lectures people about being "decent human beings?"  Why don't you try it yourself?  Decent human beings don't just toss aside criminal actions because a corrupt government lets someone get away with it.

Lawyerlady wrote:

---

apple wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

You seem to be more bothered by a copied speech than out right lies.

---

 No, I think you are confused.

Read again what I said. 

Besides, I am not bothered by the speech. The speech has nothing to do with Benghazi, its what you throw out there whenever you want to derail conversation.

 

---

 Benghazi is a disgraceful, shameful, disgusting event for the Democratic establishment.  It should NEVER be forgotten or considered bygones.  People DIED.  But, I realize that if you can't defend it, you take up Hillary's horrid "what does it matter?" shtick.  And aren't you the one that lectures people about being "decent human beings?"  Why don't you try it yourself?  Decent human beings don't just toss aside criminal actions because a corrupt government lets someone get away with it.

---

 Right, tell me where exactly I said Benghazi wasn't a horrible, tragic event. Well???? YOU CAN'T.

My point was that you all go on and on about Hillary but there was no conviction, the case itself is over.

Does that mean you have to forget the tragic event that destroyed people and families. No, it doesn't. Hillary will not be taking the fall for this, its a fact and I'm sorry you can't get over that.