TOTALLY GEEKED!

ed11563 · Guru

Donald Trump’s remarks about Russia are reckless

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

How is it reckless? It is just emails about yoga right? Or are u saying Hillary hid and deleted highly classified info?

-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Wednesday 27th of July 2016 08:46:21 PM

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Sorry - can't have it both ways. Either the emails are not a big deal, or they are. You don't get to say out of one side of your mouth that the email issue with Hillary is stupid, and then out of the other complain that someone might hack them. Even the Russians.

And quite frankly, since our own government has proven too corrupt to handle the issue - someone needs to expose it.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
Sorry - can't have it both ways. Either the emails are not a big deal, or they are. You don't get to say out of one side of your mouth that the email issue with Hillary is stupid, and then out of the other complain that someone might hack them. Even the Russians.

And quite frankly, since our own government has proven too corrupt to handle the issue - someone needs to expose it.

Exactly! Either these emails about yoga and recipes OR Hillary is a freaking criminal. Take your pic. Can't have it both ways. And, shining the light of day on govt corruption benefits us all, no matter who exposes it.

I know what to do_sometimes · Frozen Sucks!

And don't forget it was Hillary that brought Russia into the email hacking conversation.

FNW · Guru

Meh. I thought it was funny.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

NO, it was not reckless. Accusing a foreign government of illegal hacking and spying without any proof is what was reckless.

Trump's comments were a brilliant foreign policy save.

Cheerios4606 · Guru

I thought it was funny too. We cant rely on our own government to be forthcoming, so why not poke fun and ask a foreign country to help? lol!

apple · Guru

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
And don't forget it was Hillary that brought Russia into the email hacking conversation.

I believe it was the FBI.

apple · Guru

FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.

I think it was meant as a joke.

I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.

Cheerios4606 · Guru

Which is why I still dont like him even though I am a conservative republican and he is 'supposed' to be my guy.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.

Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.

I don't think that tactic is unique to any one party.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.
I don't think that tactic is unique to any one party.

Uh huh. Examples please.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.
I don't think that tactic is unique to any one party.
Uh huh. Examples please.

You can't be serious.

Ummm ya Trump and his supporters run a clean campaign, no scandals whatsoever and no deflecting. confuse

Ohfour · Hooker

apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.
I don't think that tactic is unique to any one party.
Uh huh. Examples please.
You can't be serious.
Ummm ya Trump and his supporters run a clean campaign, no scandals whatsoever and no deflecting.

Name one...

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.
I don't think that tactic is unique to any one party.
Uh huh. Examples please.
You can't be serious.
Ummm ya Trump and his supporters run a clean campaign, no scandals whatsoever and no deflecting.

Please show me where he blamed an innocent person or government with no reason whatsoever. There is NOTHING to tie the Russians to the hacking scandal.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Well, I find it a whole lot let reckless to joke about it, than to seriously make unfounded accusations against Russia.

But that's the Democratic MO - blame ANYONE to shift focus, and be damned the consequences.
I don't think that tactic is unique to any one party.
Uh huh. Examples please.
You can't be serious.
Ummm ya Trump and his supporters run a clean campaign, no scandals whatsoever and no deflecting.
Please show me where he blamed an innocent person or government with no reason whatsoever. There is NOTHING to tie the Russians to the hacking scandal.

Again, I question your news sources.

Two cybersecurity firms, Fidelis Cybersecurity and Mandiant, independently corroboratedCrowdstrike’s assessment that Russian hackers infiltrated DNC networks, having found that the two groups that hacked into the DNC used malware and methods identical to those used in other attacks attributed to the same Russian hacking groups.

Tinydancer · Guru

So then Trump was just asking them to do something they had already done.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Actually, both those articles from cybersecurity firms by apple were posted over a month ago. They are ASSUMING the email leaks are a result of what they THINK was that Russian hack, but can only speculate. Further, another group has taken credit for the leak.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
Actually, both those articles from cybersecurity firms by apple were posted over a month ago. They are ASSUMING the email leaks are a result of what they THINK was that Russian hack, but can only speculate. Further, another group has taken credit for the leak.

Yes, but it relates to your "unfounded" comment. Which is incorrect.

Tinydancer · Guru

It's a guess. A wrong guess at that.

apple · Guru

Tinydancer wrote:
It's a guess. A wrong guess at that.

The thing is, you don't know that. Nobody really knows, all we can do is go best guess of the experts.

Tinydancer · Guru

Except another group has already claimed responsibility so the experts were wrong.

apple · Guru

Tinydancer wrote:
Except another group has already claimed responsibility so the experts were wrong.

Of course they are.

Tinydancer · Guru

You would know I guess. You seem to KNOW EVERYTHING.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Actually, both those articles from cybersecurity firms by apple were posted over a month ago. They are ASSUMING the email leaks are a result of what they THINK was that Russian hack, but can only speculate. Further, another group has taken credit for the leak.
Yes, but it relates to your "unfounded" comment. Which is incorrect.

Not when by "unfounded", I'm actually talking about something worthy.

apple · Guru

Tinydancer wrote:
You would know I guess. You seem to KNOW EVERYTHING.

No, unfortunately I don't know everything, but you seem to. biggrin

I'm leaving room for the truth, if it ever surfaces.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Colbert on Question He’d Like to Ask Trump: ‘What Does Vladimir Putin’s D*ck Taste Like.

www.breitbart.com/video/2016/07/28/colbert-question-hed-like-ask-trump-vladimir-putins-dck-taste-like/

apple · Guru

shocking!

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.

Oh yes, yes, you are soo offended and indignant and self righteous now. Uh huh. What is reckless is Obama who has allowed 400, 000 unvetted migrants into this country since 2012. But, in the liberal La La Land, words are what matters. Actions, you ignore.

apple · Guru

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
apple wrote:
FNW wrote:
Meh. I thought it was funny.
I think it was meant as a joke.
I find it reckless to joke about such serious issues. Sometimes Trumps off the cuff remarks make me realize that he is more of a performer than a politician.
Oh yes, yes, you are soo offended and indignant and self righteous now. Uh huh. What is reckless is Obama who has allowed 400, 000 unvetted migrants into this country since 2012. But, in the liberal La La Land, words are what matters. Actions, you ignore.

Try staying on topic once in a while.

Deflect Deflect Deflect.

Trumps off the cuff remarks are a concern for many, even republicans. When did I say I was offended, indignant or self righteous?

Spin Spin Spin

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

You didn't answer the question. So, you are saying Hillary totally lied about the 30,000 emails just being personal crap like recipes and her lesbian pornsite membership and so there really are issues of National Security so if so, then why is she not in jail? Which is? Lesbian porn or govt secrets?

apple · Guru

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
You didn't answer the question. So, you are saying Hillary totally lied about the 30,000 emails just being personal crap like recipes and her lesbian pornsite membership and so there really are issues of National Security so if so, then why is she not in jail? Which is? Lesbian porn or govt secrets?

LOL look who is trolling!

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

I asked you a question. You can't have it both ways. It is either her personal nonsense or it is govt secrets. If you are soooo outraged over Trump , then obviously you believe that Hillary is a damn liar and criminal and did indeed compromise National Security. If she didnt, then who cares what Trump said or didn't say. You strain on a gnat and swallow Michael Moore.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Ummm, even Michael Moore says Trump is going to win.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Obama has said it as well.

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

I'll be honest.

I have real concerns about Trump being elected.

I think he could be great in some areas, but extremely bad in others.

Still.

The alternative will just be bad all around.

apple · Guru

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Obama has said it as well.

I'm sure, its in the Enquirer, jeeze USE YOUR OWN brain why don't you.

WHY would Obama say that??? He didn't.

Just like Hillary never said she would "abolish the second amendment".

Facepalm times infinity.

apple · Guru

lilyofcourse wrote:
I'll be honest.

I have real concerns about Trump being elected.

I think he could be great in some areas, but extremely bad in others.

Still.

The alternative will just be bad all around.

I like that you are being honest, I think a lot of people are just a little bit fearful of Trump being president.

There seems to be no clear WIN for America in this battle. :(

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

apple wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Obama has said it as well.
I'm sure, its in the Enquirer, jeeze USE YOUR OWN brain why don't you.
WHY would Obama say that??? He didn't.
Just like Hillary never said she would "abolish the second amendment".

Facepalm times infinity.

You seem to like old news. Just a couple of days ago, Obama admitted it is possible for Trump to win. It was quite the change from just a few months ago where he said it would never happen. Maybe you should just keep your face down in that palm.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Obama has said it as well.
I'm sure, its in the Enquirer, jeeze USE YOUR OWN brain why don't you.
WHY would Obama say that??? He didn't.
Just like Hillary never said she would "abolish the second amendment".

Facepalm times infinity.

You seem to like old news. Just a couple of days ago, Obama admitted it is possible for Trump to win. It was quite the change from just a few months ago where he said it would never happen. Maybe you should just keep your face down in that palm.

It is possible, no denying that. Obama said it is possible. Yup. So where EXACTLY did he say Trump was going to win?

He didn't.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Obama has said it as well.
I'm sure, its in the Enquirer, jeeze USE YOUR OWN brain why don't you.
WHY would Obama say that??? He didn't.
Just like Hillary never said she would "abolish the second amendment".

Facepalm times infinity.

You seem to like old news. Just a couple of days ago, Obama admitted it is possible for Trump to win. It was quite the change from just a few months ago where he said it would never happen. Maybe you should just keep your face down in that palm.

It is possible, no denying that. Obama said it is possible. Yup. So where EXACTLY did he say Trump was going to win?
He didn't.

What is more telling is the big shift in just a few months from his staunch "no way will Donald Trump win" to "yes, it's possible".

FNW · Guru

Even my Rep delegate friends who were in favor of Rubio or the highway say they will hold their noses and vote for Trump. A few months ago they would stay home before doing so. But they are smarter than that and realize if they stayed home, it would help Hillary.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
apple wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Obama has said it as well.
I'm sure, its in the Enquirer, jeeze USE YOUR OWN brain why don't you.
WHY would Obama say that??? He didn't.
Just like Hillary never said she would "abolish the second amendment".

Facepalm times infinity.

You seem to like old news. Just a couple of days ago, Obama admitted it is possible for Trump to win. It was quite the change from just a few months ago where he said it would never happen. Maybe you should just keep your face down in that palm.

It is possible, no denying that. Obama said it is possible. Yup. So where EXACTLY did he say Trump was going to win?
He didn't.
What is more telling is the big shift in just a few months from his staunch "no way will Donald Trump win" to "yes, it's possible".

Ahhh, here is where you seem to get confused.

I don't care about the shift, not at all. My point is, Obama did not say Trump was going to win.

Get it? biggrin

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Read between the lines.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Obama hates Hillary too. Get real.

apple · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
Read between the lines.

I see a lot of that "reading between the lines", basically it is putting a spin on something or interpreting it to coincide with your agenda.

I prefer to refer to the actual words used and not a biased interpretation of meaning.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Sorry. We thought you could understand nuance.

Tinydancer · Guru

I still don't understand how you think you are unbiased apple. You believe differently about things but you are just as biased.