Actually, in viewing the video, I don't see anything overt either. Sure, he's obviously a flamer in his mannerisms, but most male roles always appear a little silly and feminine in musicals, IMO.
Not worth boycotting Disney or changing travel plans, IMO. He was a little feminine in the cartoon as well. I bet if we read the book it would totally masculinse him and the changes have taken place since then.
Probably not, but the gay children kissing each other on one of their TV shows on the Disney Channel is worth making travel changes and boycotting, IMO.
Not worth boycotting Disney or changing travel plans, IMO. He was a little feminine in the cartoon as well. I bet if we read the book it would totally masculinse him and the changes have taken place since then.
He wasn't in the book. The movie is LOOSLEY and I mean LOOSELY based on the story. There was a girl, there was a beast. She broke the spell by telling him she loved him. That is about ALL the similarity to the story...
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
The story is based on a French novelists take on the trials of marriage in the 1700's.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
What? No love triangle? That seems unlike 1700s French romance!
Not in the least. No Gaston, no LeFou. Belle was actually named Beauty and she had several brothers and sisters. There was no Mrs. Potts, no Lumiere, no Cogsworth.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.