So, O & B planned it but T implemented it. Yes - this is true. However, it seems that the plan was to have the information ready in case of war crimes (again, see the things that are exempted in the treaties) but they didn't put it into action (because it was illegal). Trump did. There is a difference between thinking/planning and acting.
Since when does T do things that O told him to do? Didn't he say the same thing about the botched raid? O planned it (with totally different information and intelligence that had changed since then) and T implemented and when it was an epic and murderous fail he blamed O's planning (weird, as he didn't get any more intelligence to see if anything had changed in the meantime; weird, as war intel is stable and unchanging). However, O didn't enact it. T did.
T complains about what a disaster O was, but then carries out his plans? That doesn't really fit the profile. Something is hinky ...
Of course it is. He's Trump, after all. He couldn't possibly be doing what he feels is best. Mind you, he didn't NEED to give up his luxurious, successful lifestyle to become the punching bag of the left - but you keep up that irrational hatred. It's par for the course.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Government lesson - believe it or not, the President doesn't just get to MAKE LAWS UP. He has to base his executive orders on the laws already passed and the powers given to him. So, pretty much EVERYTHING Trump has done had that framework laid. The laws were passed by Congress. But it is the PRESIDENT'S job to enforce them, which Obama failed miserably at. Trump, however, is enforcing those laws through the executive orders - each of which reference a LAW.
Example - The WALL, passed by Congress with the support of Obama and Hillary Clinton, but not implemented by Obama's administration.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
So, O & B planned it but T implemented it. Yes - this is true. However, it seems that the plan was to have the information ready in case of war crimes (again, see the things that are exempted in the treaties) but they didn't put it into action (because it was illegal). Trump did. There is a difference between thinking/planning and acting.
Since when does T do things that O told him to do? Didn't he say the same thing about the botched raid? O planned it (with totally different information and intelligence that had changed since then) and T implemented and when it was an epic and murderous fail he blamed O's planning (weird, as he didn't get any more intelligence to see if anything had changed in the meantime; weird, as war intel is stable and unchanging). However, O didn't enact it. T did.
T complains about what a disaster O was, but then carries out his plans? That doesn't really fit the profile. Something is hinky ...
Of course it is. He's Trump, after all. He couldn't possibly be doing what he feels is best. Mind you, he didn't NEED to give up his luxurious, successful lifestyle to become the punching bag of the left - but you keep up that irrational hatred. It's par for the course.
Sorry if you're reading irrational hatred into this conversation. I'm just trying to figure it out and asking questions about conflicting information.
Right - and your immigration laws say that a Canadian citizen with a valid passport and no criminal record is allowed entry to the US for a period of 6 months but cannot work with out a work visa.
Also, a Canadian crossing the border with a valid passport is not an immigrant.
The waiting for a visa to work overseas is not a US immigration law. It's the law of the other country.
NOBODY from another country should be working here without the proper consent.