TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Threesome who split after raising son with two mothers and a father are granted 'tri-custody'


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Threesome who split after raising son with two mothers and a father are granted 'tri-custody'
Permalink  
 


Threesome who split after raising son with two mothers and a father are granted 'tri-custody' of 10-year-old boy in a historic ruling

  • Michael, 50, and Dawn Marano, 46 were involved in a polyamorous relationship with neighbor Audria Garcia, 48
  • In 2007 Mr Marano and Garcia conceived a child because Mrs Marano was infertile
  • The threesome split 18 months later after Mrs Marano and Garcia moved in together
  • The father then sued for custody of the boy and his wife filed for divorce
  • Suffolk County Supreme Court Judge H. Patrick Leis III granted 'tri-custody'  

 

4

View comments

 

A Long Island threesome who split after they raised their son with two mothers and a father have been granted 'tri-custody' of the 10-year-old boy in a historic New York ruling.

Michael, 50, and Dawn Marano, 47, from Bay Shore had been raising their son along with their downstairs neighbor Audria Garcia, 48, the boy's biological mom, The New York Post reported.

Suffolk County Supreme Court Judge H. Patrick Leis III granted custody to all three parents in an unprecedented ruling. 

Audria Garcia 48, conceived the threesome's son (pictured) with Michael Marano, 50
Marano's wife Dawn (pictured) is infertile
 

Threesome: Audria Garcia (left), 48, conceived the threesome's son (pictured) with Michael Marano, 50, because his wife Dawn Marano (right) was infertile

Tri-custody: Michael Marano, 50, is the biological father of the boy, but split with his wife in 2008

Tri-custody: Michael Marano, 50, is the biological father of the boy, but split with his wife in 2008

The Maranos married in 1994 and had been living in a conventional marriage up until they began to have 'intimate relations' with Garcia when she moved in with the couple in 2001.

In 2007, Mr Marano and Garcia conceived their son because Mrs Marano was infertile, court documents state. The threesome agreed raise the child together.

Three parents: Audria and Dawn began their own love affair in 2008 and moved into their own home

Three parents: Audria and Dawn began their own love affair in 2008 and moved into their own home

Dawn Marano fought for custody of the boy because although she was his parent, she did not have any biological or legal rights

Dawn Marano fought for custody of the boy because although she was his parent, she did not have any biological or legal rights

The wife's insurance covered Garcia's pregnancy and the two women nursed the baby and attended doctor appointments together.

After 18 months in the polyamorous relationship, the threesome split in 2008 when Mrs Marano and Garcia moved into a new home after they decided to have their own partnership.

In a historic ruling Suffolk County Supreme  Court Judge H Patrick Leiss III granted all three parents custody 

In a historic ruling Suffolk County Supreme  Court Judge H Patrick Leiss III granted all three parents custody 

The breakup took a messy turn when Mr Marano sued Garcia for custody of their biological son and Mrs Marano filed for divorce, the paper said.

The case went to trial after the biological parents agreed to joint custody, but Mr Marano opposed his ex-wife's custody bid.

Dawn Marano had filed a suit asking for rights for the boy because she is not a legal or biological parent to her son.

The woman said she did not want to have consent from the real parents to see the child.  

After the boy testified in court and identified the two women as his 'mommies', Leis granted Dawn Marano Wednesday nights with the 10-year-old.

She was also given one week of vacation during the school year and two weeks in the summer, while Garcia has residential custody. 

'No one told these three people to create this unique relationship,' the judge said during the ruling. 

Leis also told Michael Marano that no one told the father 'to conceive a child with his wife's best friend', the New York Post said. 

The father was granted rights to see the boy on weekends. 

While the two women were happy with the decision, Michael told the paper he was going to file an appeal. 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4304404/Threesome-granted-tri-custody-10-year-old-son.html#ixzz4b3m7gVzj 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Weirdos.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tsk, tsk. Now i am gonna have to send you on a long , long vacation for sensitivity training! Lol

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Why? It works for them.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Obviously it doesnt' work for them! Hello.......!

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

That poor child...

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah, ridiculous.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

This is absolutely ridiculous.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

It didnt work at all and now the poor kid has to be in the middle of the spectacle. Morality is dead to some.


__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

It would be nice if the adults could put the child first.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

They have already demonstrated that their sexual idiocy trumps everything else.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

They have already demonstrated that their sexual idiocy trumps everything else.


 I could never be in a poly-amorous relationship, but I don't mock those who are.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

They have already demonstrated that their sexual idiocy trumps everything else.


 I could never be in a poly-amorous relationship, but I don't mock those who are.

flan


 Mock?  No - this is flat out wrong.  If you are going to be sexually deviant - keep kids out of it.  Selfish bastards.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

LOL @ sensitivity training. Weirdo losers they are!

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

And y'all are welcome to your opinions.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

And y'all are welcome to your opinions.

flan


 Why do u keep saying that?  Who asked you if we were welcome to have our opinions?



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan has designated herself the opinion "right" giver. LOL.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

It would be nice if the adults could put the child first.

flan


 Yep and this is what we all agree on. They didn't put the child first in this case.  You do not have a polygamous relationship that produces a child and expect the child to not be affected.



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

Be polyamorous but don't have kids then.

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

I feel bad for the kid. But that would hold true in a regular divorce between one man and one woman too.

I agree with flan327, "It would be nice if the adults could put the child first."

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard