You keep saying he wasnt in danger. How do you know that? He could have lunged at him to choke him, etc. Bare hands can kill people too. They had words. The naked man knew that he was seen. He could have left when the homeowner left. Why didn't he?
You keep asking the same question...you know, the one that the DEAD guy can't answer.
You keep saying he wasnt in danger. How do you know that? He could have lunged at him to choke him, etc. Bare hands can kill people too. They had words. The naked man knew that he was seen. He could have left when the homeowner left. Why didn't he?
Because the man LEFT and was able to go to his own home where he had a gun. Then he went BACK and shot him. He was not in danger in his own home, he had every opportunity to call the police, and instead, he went purposefully hunting.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
You keep asking questions and we keep answering the same ones over and over.
So I ask you this. Why didn't the homeowner just call the cops once he was off the property. Why did he go back later and shoot him. That's premeditated...
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
Gaga, I have seen you post on threads where homeowners were in real danger, or what they preceven as real danger, and say the home owner had no right to shoot.
But here, where a guy left, got his gun and came back, you are all for it.
You obviously did not read your own OP, and you want to argue, but you really don't know what you are arguing.
IF you have the ability to leave, you are not in danger.
Plain and simple.
This was murder.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I should probably that it's murder but I am so sick of excuses being made for criminals that I have to say I'm not sorry the guy got shot. The sense of entitlement to break into someone else's property and help yourself and still don't leave when you had a warning the first time the owner entered. That's some chutzpah right there and not in a good way. Maybe this will be a warning for the next idiot thinking of pulling a stunt like his.
Who am I kidding probably not. The teen that shot the three robbers that broke into their house with an AR 15? The robbers grandfather says he had an unfair advantage He shot 3 robbers who invaded his family home. 3 to 1 Oy. It's another case but this is the mentality I'm freakin sick of it.
-- Edited by Mary Zombie on Monday 3rd of April 2017 04:23:20 PM
-- Edited by Mary Zombie on Monday 3rd of April 2017 04:24:08 PM
I should probably that it's murder but I am so sick of excuses being made for criminals that I have to say I'm not sorry the guy got shot. The sense of entitlement to break into someone else's property and help yourself and still don't leave when you had a warning the first time the owner entered. That's some chutzpah right there and not in a good way. Maybe this will be a warning for the next idiot thinking of pulling a stunt like his.
Who am I kidding probably not. The teen that shot the three robbers that broke into their house with an AR 15? The robbers grandfather says he had an unfair advantage He shot 3 robbers who invaded his family home. 3 to 1 Oy. It's another case but this is the mentality I'm freakin sick of it.
-- Edited by Mary Zombie on Monday 3rd of April 2017 04:23:20 PM
-- Edited by Mary Zombie on Monday 3rd of April 2017 04:24:08 PM
I heard that, maybe if his grandson was made to get a job instead of invading people's homes with knives and knuckle rings with intent to do harm he would still be alive.
Even that doesn't bring joy to my heart but the family member had a right to protect his parents and himself.
I don't see anyone making excuses for the criminal. But 2 wrongs don't make a right. And when you are not in danger, it's not ok to deliberately plan to kill people, even criminals. We have police and a justice system for a reason. This man played judge, jury and executioner - and that is not right.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I should probably that it's murder but I am so sick of excuses being made for criminals that I have to say I'm not sorry the guy got shot. The sense of entitlement to break into someone else's property and help yourself and still don't leave when you had a warning the first time the owner entered. That's some chutzpah right there and not in a good way. Maybe this will be a warning for the next idiot thinking of pulling a stunt like his.
Who am I kidding probably not. The teen that shot the three robbers that broke into their house with an AR 15? The robbers grandfather says he had an unfair advantage He shot 3 robbers who invaded his family home. 3 to 1 Oy. It's another case but this is the mentality I'm freakin sick of it.
-- Edited by Mary Zombie on Monday 3rd of April 2017 04:23:20 PM
-- Edited by Mary Zombie on Monday 3rd of April 2017 04:24:08 PM
Such a different situation it is not comparable.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Gaga, I have seen you post on threads where homeowners were in real danger, or what they preceven as real danger, and say the home owner had no right to shoot.
But here, where a guy left, got his gun and came back, you are all for it.
You obviously did not read your own OP, and you want to argue, but you really don't know what you are arguing.
IF you have the ability to leave, you are not in danger.
Plain and simple.
This was murder.
Exactly. I remember clearly when the man shot that kid in his house he caught sneaking into his daughter's room, Gaga was all for him being charged, how dare he shoot the kid, etc.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
It is comparable that in both cases there are some sympathizing with the criminal tgat broke into someone else's house.
I think the guy should have called the police but the guy was an idiot for not leaving
Darwinism
I got a chuckle out of Lily's post that they might have been lovers, but it got me to thinking. The guy in the shower did not leave which makes me think the two of them may have known each other (not necessarily lovers) and that is why the guy did not leave.
I wonder if any drugs or alcohol were involved. Must be more to this story.
You are really going to defend someone breaking and entering into someone's home and helping himself to whatever? Wow.
But he didn't have to defend himself. That is the point. He had plenty of opportunity to call the police when he left to get his gun and let the police take care of the intruder. You don't get to confront someone with a gun even on your own property when you safely left the premises. WOW
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
I firmly believe in Castle Doctrine, but I also believe in a little common sense.
This was murder. Plain and simple. You don't get to leave one building, go to another, collect a weapon, return, and then shoot someone. Castle Doctrine says you have more right to be in your property if you are already there and don't leave.
Had he been carrying when he found the man in the shower, and shot him then, without pause - it could be arguably called a "good shoot". This stinks to high heaven.
I got a chuckle out of Lily's post that they might have been lovers, but it got me to thinking. The guy in the shower did not leave which makes me think the two of them may have known each other (not necessarily lovers) and that is why the guy did not leave.
I wonder if any drugs or alcohol were involved. Must be more to this story.
It is comparable that in both cases there are some sympathizing with the criminal tgat broke into someone else's house. I think the guy should have called the police but the guy was an idiot for not leaving Darwinism
Please show me where anyone sympathized with the criminal. Saying the shooting was wrong and committed murder does not mean that it excuses the behavior of the other criminal, either.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
well, we don't have all the facts but would seem from what's being reported that was nearly a textbook case for escaping unharmed and calling the cavalry and letting them do their job
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
Frankly, the intruder was somewhere he had no business being. I don't think he should've been killed in this case but I also can't drum up much sympathy for him.
I can't drum up much sympathy for the homeowner/property owner either. He overreacted. Neither party is innocent, in my book. Fact is though, this wouldn't have happened had the intruder not been where he shouldn't have been anyway.
I can't drum up much sympathy for the homeowner/property owner either. He overreacted. Neither party is innocent, in my book. Fact is though, this wouldn't have happened had the intruder not been where he shouldn't have been anyway.
I can't drum up much sympathy for the homeowner/property owner either. He overreacted. Neither party is innocent, in my book. Fact is though, this wouldn't have happened had the intruder not been where he shouldn't have been anyway.
I understand what you mean, chef.
This shouldn't have happened.
I guess there must be more, to this story.
(Not that we'll ever hear it. It's just so odd.)
And so wrong, all the way around.
I'd love to hear the rest of the story. The part we have, both sides stink.
I can't drum up much sympathy for the homeowner/property owner either. He overreacted. Neither party is innocent, in my book. Fact is though, this wouldn't have happened had the intruder not been where he shouldn't have been anyway.
I understand what you mean, chef.
This shouldn't have happened.
I guess there must be more, to this story.
(Not that we'll ever hear it. It's just so odd.)
And so wrong, all the way around.
I'd love to hear the rest of the story. The part we have, both sides stink.
Yes.
Wrong, all the way around.
I'd like to hear how it all pans out.
(I won't hold my breath...so many times, we don't hear the outcome.)