In fact it's one of the rights that's mentioned in the Constitution itself (before the Bill of Rights was even in consideration). It's what "promote the general welfare" in the Preamble was speaking of, in part. The "general welfare" is the health and safety of the citizens.
It's also mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, "And among these rights are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness". You can't have life if you are dead.
The solution for this problem is Universal Healthcare. Obamacare destroyed what was. It's going down in flames now too (as I believe was intended from the beginning). We can't rebuild the healthcare system from the remains of the destroyed one. We have to start over with something that can work and last.
When a building is demolished to make way for new construction, the replacement building isn't built using the ole destroyed materials. The old materials are taken away and the new building is built with new materials.
Ummm... no.
Just, no.
Promote the general welfare is not about making sure every single person has the chicken pox vaccine or is treated for strep or gets birth control.
It's about making sure the country is ran in a way that we thrive in safety.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And you are not guaranteed life or that you won't die.
Just that while you are alive, you have liberty to pursue happiness.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
It is not a right to compel the service of others. We used to call that slavery.
-Lady Gaga Snerd
_______________________________________
I agree with that. No one that I know of is suggesting compelling anyone to do anything. The suggestion I agree with is Universal Healthcare. and get insurance companies out of the business of general medicine. Let them carry policies for better rooms, optional procedures, better prosthetics, scar removal, et cetera. That sort of thing.
If healthcare is a right mentioned in the constitution, what was the insurance company and who used it?
Using the logic that "general welfare" is the health and safety of the citizens, I think food would contribute to general welfare. Do we need a system to provide free food to everyone? Housing is important to for good welfare, free homes to everyone too.
-Domestic Engineer
____________________________________
No insurance company. Back then Doctors did what they could and were supported by the community for doing so.
We currently do have a system to provide free food and free housing (and free healthcare, if we're mentioning all the stuff that they get for free) for those that can't afford it. Problem is we don't have the same thing for people that can afford food and housing but have little or nothing left for healthcare.
Basic, emergency healthcare is already a right. An emergency room can't turn you away. Beyond that, it is like anything else, you have to pay for it. It's getting ridiculous, people expecting the government to pay for their food, shelter, etc. That is NOT the government's job.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Promote the general welfare is not about making sure every single person has the chicken pox vaccine or is treated for strep or gets birth control.
It's about making sure the country is ran in a way that we thrive in safety. -lilyofcourse
__________________________________
And we "thrive in safety" in a society that allows us to be treated for healthcare concerns.
Allows. That means privilege.
Not right.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Basic, emergency healthcare is already a right. An emergency room can't turn you away. Beyond that, it is like anything else, you have to pay for it. It's getting ridiculous, people expecting the government to pay for their food, shelter, etc. That is NOT the government's job.
Exactly. Just like this whole transgender reassignment surgery. There aren't that many doctors in America that specialize in that. Obama seemed to want to order hospitals to offer something which is pretty rare and for which there aren't even that many trained doctors to do it.
Everyone wants everything they want whenever they want it. That's nice but the real world doesn't work that way. Well, i guess it does for some people who manage to use govt to take, take, take the earnings of others.
Good grief. Here is a more reasonable example of "want vs need" of an EpiPen.
An EpiPen costs about $600. The ingredient, epinephrine, cost $1.79 per vial. Plus the cost of a small syringe. Yes, you CAN buy the vial and a syringe yourself. Both can be self-injected. One is a brand named, high cost, convenient product. The other requires one extra step, loading the syringe. Which one can YOU afford?
Designer clothing can range in price from a few hundred dollars to thousands of dollars. Or you can go to Walmart and buy much cheaper clothing that will serve the same purpose, which is to cover your body. Which can YOU afford?
Which one makes better USE of taxpayer money?
This is not rocket science, IMHO.
I voted other for this reason.
__________________
I drink coffee so I don't kill you.
I quilt so I don't kill you.
Do you see a theme?
Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.
Good grief. Here is a more reasonable example of "want vs need" of an EpiPen.
An EpiPen costs about $600. The ingredient, epinephrine, cost $1.79 per vial. Plus the cost of a small syringe. Yes, you CAN buy the vial and a syringe yourself. Both can be self-injected. One is a brand named, high cost, convenient product. The other requires one extra step, loading the syringe. Which one can YOU afford?
Designer clothing can range in price from a few hundred dollars to thousands of dollars. Or you can go to Walmart and buy much cheaper clothing that will serve the same purpose, which is to cover your body. Which can YOU afford?
Which one makes better USE of taxpayer money?
This is not rocket science, IMHO.
I voted other for this reason.
Perfect analogy.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
Good grief. Here is a more reasonable example of "want vs need" of an EpiPen.
An EpiPen costs about $600. The ingredient, epinephrine, cost $1.79 per vial. Plus the cost of a small syringe. Yes, you CAN buy the vial and a syringe yourself. Both can be self-injected. One is a brand named, high cost, convenient product. The other requires one extra step, loading the syringe. Which one can YOU afford?
Designer clothing can range in price from a few hundred dollars to thousands of dollars. Or you can go to Walmart and buy much cheaper clothing that will serve the same purpose, which is to cover your body. Which can YOU afford?
Which one makes better USE of taxpayer money?
This is not rocket science, IMHO.
I voted other for this reason.
I learned something new today.
A close friend of DS2 had a peanut allergy. Mom always had an epipen with her.
I put DH on my health insurance a few years ago because once I retire, we both will have insurance for the rest of our lives. He works in the private sector which doesn't provide such a benefit.
Access to healthcare is a right. Having someone else pay for it is not. I have always paid for my insurance.
Since we don't have universal healthcare that's pretty much how it is
I rarely ever had insurance, but I always had health care and paid out of pocket.
Now, no one will touch anyone without health insurance or a credit card.
THAT'S not ok in my line of thinking.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
So , you never had health insurance at your job. It was on your husband who recently retired? And, whether you still had your job or not, if he was planning to retire, what then was your plan?
So , you never had health insurance at your job. It was on your husband who recently retired? And, whether you still had your job or not, if he was planning to retire, what then was your plan?
Obviously to pay for my OWN health insurance with my OWN salary...
I heard that Aetna pulled out of Indiana due to a rate increase being denied and that there aren't any private health insurance companies left in Indiana. Is that true?
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
If you need health insurance, can your DH get a part time job as well to help pay for it? But, i know he had some health issues. Did you go to the exchanges?
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Friday 12th of May 2017 08:22:27 AM
If you need health insurance, can your DH get a part time job as well to help pay for it? But, i know he had some health issues. Did you go to the exchanges?
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Friday 12th of May 2017 08:22:27 AM
We have talked to the woman who set up all his Medicare details. We have several quotes, but they're pricey.
Healthcare cannot be a right because it requires the service of others.
____________________________________________________
my lady's sentiments exactly(she's a nurse)--emergency(lifesaving)care is an exception, however, and sort of in a gray area--the problem, she says, is that people come to ER for everything these days--sprains, cuts, minor ills, etc. and seem to demand treatment though it is clearly outside the scope of emergency care--and the majority of the folks, of course, don't expect to pay ANYTHING for it
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
Healthcare cannot be a right because it requires the service of others. ____________________________________________________
my lady's sentiments exactly(she's a nurse)--emergency(lifesaving)care is an exception, however, and sort of in a gray area--the problem, she says, is that people come to ER for everything these days--sprains, cuts, minor ills, etc. and seem to demand treatment though it is clearly outside the scope of emergency care--and the majority of the folks, of course, don't expect to pay ANYTHING for it
Our hospital has a clinic inside the ER.
You sign in, and are triaged by the ER, but if you are not emergent, you get bounced to the clinic.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
in theory, that's exactly how triage is supposed to work--in practice, however, many patients demand/expect IMMEDIATE care for their ills and will make significant and profane spectacles if not treated THIS MINUTE(particularly if kids are involved)and will loudly proclaim their " right " to immediate care--you really have to witness it to understand the situation(and it happens quite often)
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke