So it is ripe for successful appeal. First, you need to read the text messages she sent him. One was when he was doing it and got out of the car because it was starting to work. He got out and texted her that he was scared because it was working and she told him to get back in the car and do it. Then she texted a friend after that and said "I am responsible for his death, I told him to get back in the car".
Second: But the judge used a case from Worcester Ma (HI Trudy) about a fire in an abandoned building where two homeless people were known to live. 6 firefighters died in that fire trying to save the couple, the homeless couple inadvertently started the fire and ran from the building but didn't call for help even though they had a cell phone. They were tried for invol manslaughter and were acquitted on appeal. So not sure why the judge used that guilty verdict in the original trial as precedence.
Hi! Ah, the Worcester 6. All I hear about every day!
I don't think it should have made it passed the ADA's desk.
He got out. He chose to get back in.
His actions resulted in his death.
Personal responsibility trumps a text.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I....well legalities aside I dont understand why this girl is not just consumed with guilt. I dont think I could live with myself if I thought my actions caused someone else to harm themself.
I....well legalities aside I dont understand why this girl is not just consumed with guilt. I dont think I could live with myself if I thought my actions caused someone else to harm themself.
She has mental issues herself.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.