TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Playboy’s Hugh Hefner Liberated Us Straight Into Hell


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Playboy’s Hugh Hefner Liberated Us Straight Into Hell
Permalink  
 


Nolte: Playboy’s Hugh Hefner Liberated Us Straight Into Hell

 
 
 
 

My highest political value, the one that informs everything from my vote to my political activism, is individual liberty. An ideal America is one where every consenting adult is allowed to live their life in whatever way they choose. As long as you do not touch the tip of my nose, feel free to swing your fists however you like.

Hugh Hefner, the founder of Playboy magazine who died last month at age 91, furthered the noble cause of live and let live.  In 1953, when Playboy first launched, ours was a society that not only used the power of the state to outlaw certain behaviors and beliefs, but was one with countless societal scarlet letters, countless stigmas that banished certain kinds of misfits, mostly sexual deviants, from society.

Simply put, and although I disagree with both, I want to live in a country where a flaming homosexual who demands I bake his wedding cake is allowed to serve in Congress alongside a flaming Muslim who believes sodomy should be added to the long list of unhealthy behaviors prohibited by the government. Until a crime is committed, until violence is used or excused, no one in America should face banishment over their beliefs or for living life on their own terms.

Hefner’s example of living on his own terms was that of an American success story, and even if his destiny was one of godless hedonism, as my colleague Joel Pollak wrote last month, he was still the author of that destiny, a man who transformed himself from a maladroit copywriter into a maladroit publisher, and who then spent more than a half-century posing — rather awkwardly — as Ian Flemings’ idea of a pipe-smoking swinger.

Also in the plus column is Hefner’s early support of the Civil Rights movement. Like Marlon Brando and Charlton Heston, Hefner climbed on board that righteous train in the early 60s, before it was cool, and helped to make it cool. And that is no small thing.

Without a doubt, Hefner’s relentless crusade against certain pieties and prejudices removed countless scarlet letters, and that is all good … but that is only 20 percent of his legacy.

The remaining 80 percent unleashed hell.

Filled with intentional lies, Alfred Kinsey’s dual (and now debunked) reports — Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953) — told normal Americans that they were abnormal; that everyone was enjoying pre-marital sex, extra-marital sex, and homosexual sex; that America’s moralistic society was an inferno of suppression and hypocrisy; that those who saved themselves for marriage, believed in marital fidelity, and chose not to engage in loveless sex, were society’s true freaks and misfits.

This was not true. Far from it. In fact, American society today is still not as permissive as Kinsey portrayed it some 70 years ago.

Nevertheless, thanks to the demonic Kinsey and his unquestioning enablers among America’s elite, every man or woman looking to be hip; anyone looking for a reason to stop controlling their own worst  attributes, now had science on their side to worship self, to pursue the empty pleasures of sexual deviancy over the fulfillment and happiness that is only possible through a moral life governed by moderation.

Hefner declared himself Kinsey’s pamphleteer, and there is no question that on the pornographic pages of Playboy, that is exactly what he was.

To begin with, by taking pornography out of the backroom and mainstreaming it into urban chic, Hefner forever altered our view of women. Before Hefner, mainstream American culture idolized and idealized women, placed them on pedestals as goddesses, never went beyond presenting them as the precious objects of our dreams (see herehere, and here).

But with the turn of a page, Hefner demolished that pedestal, stripped off the goddesses’ clothes, and spread her legs wide open. Goddesses plopped to earth as flat-out sex objects, things created only to serve man’s basest desires.

No longer did we have to better ourselves, civilize ourselves, or make ourselves worthy in order to obtain the gift of femininity, because for the price of a magazine, there it was — stark naked and staring right into our eyes; stapled for our consumption and folded into three.

In an instant, that precious gift that comes with the sacramental union between one man and one woman was cheapened into an entitlement and, worst of all, done so through a goddess’s act of self-degradation.

And that was the least of it.

Aided by the Pill, a welfare state that rewarded single-motherhood, and America’s ruling class normalizing deviancy through the unholy alchemy of “sophistication,” those acts of self-degradation flew off the pages of Playboy and into a very real sexual revolution.

In defense of Hefner’s cultural impact, the great Camille Paglia told the Hollywood Reporter last week:

Hefner reimagined the American male as a connoisseur in the continental manner, a man who enjoyed all the fine pleasures of life, including sex. Hefner brilliantly put sex into a continuum of appreciative response to jazz, to art, to ideas, to fine food … and the art of seduction[.]

This is all true, but it is only true for some, very few actually, because those like Hefner who could afford “all the fine pleasures of life” could also financially afford to paper over the emotional and physical wreckage that comes with decadence.

No matter what the system looks like, America’s Beautiful People will always survive and flourish. But Hefner was the first to come along and warp the system into one where onlythe Beautiful People could survive and flourish.

And so, among those who could not afford “all the pleasures of life”; who could not afford the abortions, alimony, and child support; who did not look like a Playboy Bunny; and could not surround himself with Bunnies willing to not complicate his life after a loveless encounter — among us everyday folks who actually have to look into the eyes of life’s consequences, the casualties mounted…

Divorce, broken homes, bankruptcy, generations of children raised by a single parent, sexually-transmitted diseases, addiction, AIDs, early death, loneliness, despair, guilt, spiritual ruin, and 58 million innocent children butchered in the one place they should be safest, in their own mother’s womb.

That was the analog fallout.

The digital fallout is somehow worse.

These days, one ill-considered click of your browser’s setting instantly reveals the truth, that pornography is a satanic drug, something that went from just being dirty, into something that is so unspeakably degrading towards women I dare not describe it.

Like any drug, in order to produce the desired effect, the potency must be increased and increased and increased… This means that with the hollow promise of Kardashianism, and after just a few months of living the dream as a porn queen in a meat market always looking for fresh meat, countless young women are being chewed up and spit out, their lives ruined forever by an Internet that is forever.

And those are the lucky ones, the ones who don’t try to heal a soul wounded by self-degradation with the kind of illegal drugs that can only be paid for through even more self-degradation.

On the other side of that computer screen is a generation of boys just a click away from a drug that will physically and mentally warp them into the dysfunctional freak Hefner himself eventually became — a lonely, frustrated recluse living in someone else’s decrepit home; a pathetic sex addict surrounded by a harem of living centerfolds, but one who could only perform with the aid of hardcore porn in one corner and his Bunnies pretending to have a lesbian orgy in the other.

Hefner was a media icon, a limousine leftist, the winner of countless First Amendment awards, and a warlock who manufactured a lifestyle filled with perfect ****tails, ideal stereo systems, the most comfortable leather slippers, and the prose of John Updike. But according to a number of witnesses, including late porn star Linda Lovelace, that was all a shiny veneer to cover over a hopeless degenerate who allegedly needed to see women get humped by German Shepards; a man who abandoned a wife and daughter; a man who even into his seventies slipped young women the Quaaludes he called “thigh openers.”

Yes, Hugh Hefner helped to spread freedom, but he is also a reminder of the many terrible costs that come with freedom.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


Hefner’s example of living on his own terms was that of an American success story, and even if his destiny was one of godless hedonism, as my colleague Joel Pollak wrote last month, he was still the author of that destiny, a man who transformed himself from a maladroit copywriter into a maladroit publisher, and who then spent more than a half-century posing — rather awkwardly — as Ian Flemings’ idea of a pipe-smoking swinger.
___________________________________________________________________________________

like him or not, he lived his life on his own terms--the author of this article seems over-the-top self-righteous and quite obviously envious of hefner's success/fame



__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Is " living your life on your own terms' . Lots of people we dont admire " lived kide on their terms". So what?

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

We get it. You don't like him.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I offered this article as food for thought.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah - apparently, the "not judging" thing only applies when people want it to.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Huh? Everybody judges. We need to judge some things.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have to agree with this. But I don't think women should pose naked and pregnant either. The naked pregnant stomach is something that should be seen by husband and doctor, not exploited and shown on TV, in magazines, etc. I'm just a prude that way I guess.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't know, I like the pregnant pictures.

As long as they are tasteful, all nudes, I'm ok with it.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2643
Date:
Permalink  
 

Let's face it, beauty sells. And so does sex. And the human body is beautiful. And women have been using sex and nakedness to get what they want for centuries. And men have been oogling women for centuries and they are horny creatures.

Oh, and while it may be exploitation, they are voluntarily posing as well as getting paid for it. So it is the positive definition of exploit. They are making a productive use of it.


exploitplay
verb ex·ploit \ ik-ˈsplȯit , ˈek-ˌsplȯit \
Definition of exploit

transitive verb
1 :to make productive use of :utilize exploiting your talents
2 :to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage

__________________

Life is short.  Live it to the fullest.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I like the Sports Illustrated nude athlete photos.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2643
Date:
Permalink  
 

So, how is SI nudes different than Playboy? They show the same things.

__________________

Life is short.  Live it to the fullest.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Really? What makes one ok and the other not?

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

For the SI issue you dont see all their body parts for one. And the poses are athletic nit sexual. But guess you will pretend not to know the difference.
I am not offended by nudity.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

LOL..... ok. If you say so.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

You cant tell the diff between a naked baby on a rug for a baby pic or a model spreading her legs? Alrighty then.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

What??? What naked baby? Who is spreading their legs????

What are you talking about?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

You keep saying you cant tell the difference between porn and non porn

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2643
Date:
Permalink  
 

Playboy is as much porn as SI is. And as much as renassiance art is.

__________________

Life is short.  Live it to the fullest.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Huh? Everybody judges. We need to judge some things.


 REALLY?  That's not the response I got on my Joel Osteen thread.  Selective much?



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I like the Sports Illustrated nude athlete photos.


 Have you actually looked at Playboy?  Because I've looked at both, and SI is actually worse sometimes. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

You keep saying you cant tell the difference between porn and non porn


Pornography is the depiction of sexual acts to arouse.  Playboy is pictures of semi nude women - they are not engaging in sexual acts.  

Or, as the Supreme Court once said - you know it when you see it. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

You keep saying you cant tell the difference between porn and non porn


 Have you bumped your head or something? 



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

I like the Sports Illustrated nude athlete photos.


 Have you actually looked at Playboy?  Because I've looked at both, and SI is actually worse sometimes. 


 Actually i was talking about the Body Issue of ESPN, lol.  Not SI.  

 

dm_160629_COM_NFL_Feature_ESPN_The_Magaz



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT58a5ug5Fn6ZmYOpe7NzZ



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2643
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sure you were. Good cover tho.

So, then it is sexism because they are men, not women. But they can still be sexual images. Just because there is no penis or testicles does not make the image any diffent then playboy. It is almost the same. Except no pubic hair is being shown.



__________________

Life is short.  Live it to the fullest.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

My boss gets an SI subscription, and he gets the swimsuit issue every year. This year, he threw it in the trash, said they had crossed the line.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Not a fan of SI either. I'm not offended by the human body. I just think it's unnecessary nudity.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

jlbear71 wrote:

Sure you were. Good cover tho.

So, then it is sexism because they are men, not women. But they can still be sexual images. Just because there is no penis or testicles does not make the image any diffent then playboy. It is almost the same. Except no pubic hair is being shown.


 It's not a cover.  I wasn't talking about the SI swimsuit issue.  BTW, i don't need any "cover" for my opinions, thanks so much.  But, I was talking about this body issue.  



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

My boss gets an SI subscription, and he gets the swimsuit issue every year. This year, he threw it in the trash, said they had crossed the line.


 Where is the line?



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

jlbear71 wrote:

Sure you were. Good cover tho.

So, then it is sexism because they are men, not women. But they can still be sexual images. Just because there is no penis or testicles does not make the image any diffent then playboy. It is almost the same. Except no pubic hair is being shown.


 Penis and testicles is pretty much the definition of male nudity. So not sure what your point is.  



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

My boss gets an SI subscription, and he gets the swimsuit issue every year. This year, he threw it in the trash, said they had crossed the line.


 Where is the line?


 You know it when you see it.

 

For him, he said there really wasn't any swimsuits.  



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard