TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Manhattan judge rules that New York bar CAN refuse service to Trump supporter wearing MAGA hat


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Manhattan judge rules that New York bar CAN refuse service to Trump supporter wearing MAGA hat
Permalink  
 


Manhattan judge rules that New York bar CAN refuse service to Trump supporter wearing MAGA hat

  • Greg Piatek, 31, was visiting the September 11 memorial with friends in January 2017
  • He claims the West Village bar denied serviced because he was wearing a 'Make America Great Again' hat
  • Piatek's attorney, said his client's hat was a 'spiritual tribute' to September 11 victims and that he should be protected under an anti-discrimination statute
  • Justice David Cohen tossed the lawsuit on Wednesday saying the law doesn't protect against political discrimination
  • The bar owners deny that Piatek was removed and have claimed the lawsuit is a 'publicity stunt' 

 

91

View comments

 

Greg Piatek, 31 (pictured), a Trump supporter who sued a New York City bar for discrimination after he was thrown out for wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat has lost his lawsuit
 

Greg Piatek, 31 (pictured), a Trump supporter who sued a New York City bar for discrimination after he was thrown out for wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat has lost his lawsuit

A Trump supporter who sued a New York City bar for discrimination after he was thrown out for wearing a 'Make America Great Again' hat has lost his lawsuit.

Philadelphia accountant Greg Piatek, 31, claims the staff of The Happiest Hour in Manhattan said he wasn't welcome because he and his friends supported the Republican president. 

He sued the West Village bar claiming the incident 'offended his sense of being American'. 

ADVERTISING

But Justice David Cohen tossed the lawsuit on Wednesday saying the law doesn't protect against political discrimination.

According to the New York Post, Piatek said he and his friends visited the September 11 Memorial in January 2017.

He then claimed the bar staff refused to serve after seeing Piatek in the MAGA hat.

Piatek claims that after he and his friends complained about the rude service, the staff said: 'Anyone who supports Trump - or believes in what you believe - is not welcome here! And you need to leave right now because we won't serve you!'

Paul Liggieri, Piatek's attorney, said his client's hat was a 'spiritual tribute' to September 11 victims and that he should be protected under an anti-discrimination statute.

The bar's attorney, Elizabeth Conway, said Piatek did not face discrimination because only religious beliefs, not political ones, are protected under state and city discrimination law.

'Supporting Trump is not a religion,' Conway argued.

The bar's attorney, Elizabeth Conway, said Piatek did not face discrimination because only religious beliefs, not political ones, are protected under state and city discrimination law
 

The bar's attorney, Elizabeth Conway, said Piatek did not face discrimination because only religious beliefs, not political ones, are protected under state and city discrimination law

Paul Liggieri, Piatek's attorney, said his client's hat was a 'spiritual tribute' to September 11 victims and that he should be protected under an anti-discrimination statute (Pictured,  Trump in August 2015)
 

Paul Liggieri, Piatek's attorney, said his client's hat was a 'spiritual tribute' to September 11 victims and that he should be protected under an anti-discrimination statute (Pictured,  Trump in August 2015)

Cohen seemed to agree and said the incident was no more than a 'petty slight'

'Plaintiff does not state any faith-based principle to which the hat relates,' Cohen said. 

Piatek has been for an unspecified amount for 'emotional damage'. His attorney lawyer told The New York Post he'll decide on whether or not to appeal. 

Jon Neidich, owner of The Happiest Hour denies that Piatek was kicked out and said he 'was sufficiently pleased with his service at the bar [and] that he added' a $36 tip onto the $186 tab, according to the New York Post.  

Neidech called Piatek's lawsuit a 'publicity stunt' and the claims 'outrageous and disparaging'.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5658483/Trump-supporter-lawsuit-against-NYC-bar-tossed.html#ixzz5Dm8KvLp2 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

You know, I'm gonna say the same thing about this I've said about the baker.

It's a private business.

If the owner/manager doesn't want to serve certain people, those people can go somewhere else.

We had a similar incident here, restaurant chain had just opened a new store here, the owner told someone with a Trump hat leave. Word got around, and within a month, that owner issued a public apology.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

I would not support an establishment that refused to serve patrons because of political beliefs - either Democrat or Republican. That's un-American.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree with what LL said.

__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't either.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't either. I hope this bar goes out of business.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 649
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree that isince it's a private business, though public accomadition, there is not a protected group involved. It is not his religion.


I have some doubts about his story. I did not find anywhere in his initial filling that he was actually served. His tab had 17 drinks over period of 3 hours. So he would have sat there for three hours with his hat before they kick him out.

__________________

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard