A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
"Public places include synagogues, churches, schools, restaurants, stores and public buses. "Public places are defined as: a place where more than 10 persons are intended to congregate," the news release says."
This is another law that "sounds" good. Who is going to enforce it? Another useless "law" that let's politicians say "oh look we are doing something" when in reality nobody is going to enforce anything.
Its not that hard. Re-word it to be specific to basic social amenities - schools, government jobs, specific hospital wings, airports, etc. There is talk of needing proof of vaccination to enter Canada to be presented with the passport at customs. Even for returning citizens, because you may have been in a country with an outbreak. For instance, if someone travelled to New York, they would be required to travel with their immunization certificate because they would need it to return from New York due to that city's outbreak.
For our own outbreaks here, we are looking at mandatory school vaccinations (which would pretty much cover any other of these public areas).
Public schools are going to know who is vaccinated and who isnt.
As for other places, no clue.
Guess we could all start wearing masks every where.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Public schools are going to know who is vaccinated and who isnt.
As for other places, no clue.
Guess we could all start wearing masks every where.
So, the Public School is going to be contacted? There are a lot of public places. Is someone going to verify the vaccination status of all the "undocumented immigrants" that are here? So, if you go to the library are you going to have pull out a vaccination card? Nobody is going to enforce this.
Instead of politicians making "feel good" nonsensical policy, why don't we go back to the days when we had an actual Public Health Dept that did contact tracing and had the powers to quarantine people.
But, what is a "public place"? Is Walmart a public place? How about going to a baseball game or concert? The list of "public places" is endless and nonenforcable.
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Tuesday 26th of March 2019 09:44:14 PM
All students in the publc school are required to be immuninized UNLESS they aren't due to medical or religious reasons. Homeless students or undocumented students are required to be admitted to the Public school even without records. So in other words, you are required to be vaccinated, well, unless you are not. So, the rules either need to apply to everyone or what is the point?
Instead of politicians making "feel good" nonsensical policy, why don't we go back to the days when we had an actual Public Health Dept that did contact tracing and had the powers to quarantine people.
But, what is a "public place"? Is Walmart a public place? How about going to a baseball game or concert? The list of "public places" is endless and nonenforcable.
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Tuesday 26th of March 2019 09:44:14 PM
And how can the government say you can't go to Walmart? Walmart is a private business.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
All students in the publc school are required to be immuninized UNLESS they aren't due to medical or religious reasons. Homeless students or undocumented students are required to be admitted to the Public school even without records. So in other words, you are required to be vaccinated, well, unless you are not. So, the rules either need to apply to everyone or what is the point?
So, how far does it go? I mean, measles and mumps, sure. Polio - no brainer. Tetanus? That's not catching, so that's not part of the contagious argument. What about chicken pox? That's so rarely deadly that even before the vaccine the number of annual deaths from complications didn't even register a percentage point - and most of those were adults. If children got the chicken pox, they were fine and thereafter immune. Some people experience adverse affects from the vaccine. What about the flu shot? You going to require that every year even though the efficacy varies year to year and is sometimes completely useless? How about the Gardisal vaccine? That one is a stinker - completely not worth the risk of the now documented risk of side effects, including death. Hepatitis? I can see that argument.
It's a lot more complex than "we going to ban the un-vaccinated from public places." No, you are not. You are going to make a rule that makes you feel better, that will get ignored, and that will give people a false sense of security.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Public schools are going to know who is vaccinated and who isnt.
As for other places, no clue.
Guess we could all start wearing masks every where.
So, the Public School is going to be contacted? There are a lot of public places. Is someone going to verify the vaccination status of all the "undocumented immigrants" that are here? So, if you go to the library are you going to have pull out a vaccination card? Nobody is going to enforce this.
It's not about the public schools knowing and needing to be contacted. It is about ensuring that children are vaccinated from a young age which means that they will not be a threat in other public places. Start with the kids and it spreads from there.
I am all for vaccinating kids (adults, too) and had mine when I entered school Smallpox (yes, that is right), measles, mumps, polio, tetanaus.
But the problem now, as I see it, is the "I have a RIGHT to not vaccinate my kids" for some reason or other. Because they are not necessary and drug companies make so much money? I think not.
Not sure which religions ban vaccinations...
LL is correct, where to draw the line?
But I want to say - forget the government, political correctness, etc. etc. and just use some common sense or practical sense in regard to your children's health (and yours, too).
Just cannot get my head around all the hullabaloo over vaccinations, among other things....
We have had to provide immunizations for school and for some of the camps they have attended.
Although I am not certain, I believe Christian Scientists do not believe in medical assistance, or believe more in the power of prayer over medical science. Kind of oxymoron to their title I suppose.
I don't understand the hullabaloo either. If your kids are vaccinated, what is the problem if they are exposed to someone who isn't? Isn't the purpose of vaccines to be immune to the disease?
Back in the day, whenever a child had chickenpox parents intentionally would expose their children to it so they could get it as a child rather than an adult. My brother shared with his entire class and me. LOL
I'm not an anti-vaxxer. My kids are vaccinated for measles, mumps, rubella, whooping cough, hepatitis and even chicken pox (although unnecessary, I feel). I got these vaccines mostly because the risks of the disease outweigh any risk of the vaccine. HOWEVER. We do not get the flu shot, and I flat out refuse for my kids to get the gardisil vaccine - I'd take that one all the way to the Supreme Court.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
According to last's news, and the articles I've read, it's for 30 days.
It's an attempted, self imposed quarantine of sorts.
My point about schools, wasn't about contacting them.
It was that schools may be the only ones able to know who of their students were or were not vaccinated.
Not that churches or walmart would have to contact the school for poof.
The thought process in this, in my understanding, is to help stem the spread of measles that is currently on the rise.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
MMR, polio, hep, and whatever else was required at the time.
Between middle and high school the kids had to get a booster of something, meningitis or something, I can't remember.
My dad was vaccinated in the great vaccination of his day. He has that small circle on his arm like so many his age. His mom had polio as a child, she made sure to vaccinate her kids.
My mom has only ever had a flu and tetanus, and she refuses to get any other. The only reason she got the two she took, was because of her job at the time. Although, I'm surprised she had my brother and I vaccinated. I really think my dad pushed that.
Before my grandbaby is born, I'm getting the whooping cough vaccine, and any other boosters I may need.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
All students in the publc school are required to be immuninized UNLESS they aren't due to medical or religious reasons. Homeless students or undocumented students are required to be admitted to the Public school even without records. So in other words, you are required to be vaccinated, well, unless you are not. So, the rules either need to apply to everyone or what is the point?
So, how far does it go? I mean, measles and mumps, sure. Polio - no brainer. Tetanus? That's not catching, so that's not part of the contagious argument. What about chicken pox? That's so rarely deadly that even before the vaccine the number of annual deaths from complications didn't even register a percentage point - and most of those were adults. If children got the chicken pox, they were fine and thereafter immune. Some people experience adverse affects from the vaccine. What about the flu shot? You going to require that every year even though the efficacy varies year to year and is sometimes completely useless? How about the Gardisal vaccine? That one is a stinker - completely not worth the risk of the now documented risk of side effects, including death. Hepatitis? I can see that argument.
It's a lot more complex than "we going to ban the un-vaccinated from public places." No, you are not. You are going to make a rule that makes you feel better, that will get ignored, and that will give people a false sense of security.
Well, that is what govt does. Oh let's just BAN the Unvaccinated! And "POOF" all the unvaccinated people will just say OH OK and not go out. It's just govt grandstanding.
Public schools are going to know who is vaccinated and who isnt.
As for other places, no clue.
Guess we could all start wearing masks every where.
So, the Public School is going to be contacted? There are a lot of public places. Is someone going to verify the vaccination status of all the "undocumented immigrants" that are here? So, if you go to the library are you going to have pull out a vaccination card? Nobody is going to enforce this.
It's not about the public schools knowing and needing to be contacted. It is about ensuring that children are vaccinated from a young age which means that they will not be a threat in other public places. Start with the kids and it spreads from there.
A "ban" isn't going to ensure anything. Woudl you mind telling me how that will work in reality?
MMR, polio, hep, and whatever else was required at the time.
Between middle and high school the kids had to get a booster of something, meningitis or something, I can't remember.
My dad was vaccinated in the great vaccination of his day. He has that small circle on his arm like so many his age. His mom had polio as a child, she made sure to vaccinate her kids.
My mom has only ever had a flu and tetanus, and she refuses to get any other. The only reason she got the two she took, was because of her job at the time. Although, I'm surprised she had my brother and I vaccinated. I really think my dad pushed that.
Before my grandbaby is born, I'm getting the whooping cough vaccine, and any other boosters I may need.
Tetanus. When is the last time you had a tetanus booster? I need mine by next March. Every ten years.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
MMR, polio, hep, and whatever else was required at the time.
Between middle and high school the kids had to get a booster of something, meningitis or something, I can't remember.
My dad was vaccinated in the great vaccination of his day. He has that small circle on his arm like so many his age. His mom had polio as a child, she made sure to vaccinate her kids.
My mom has only ever had a flu and tetanus, and she refuses to get any other. The only reason she got the two she took, was because of her job at the time. Although, I'm surprised she had my brother and I vaccinated. I really think my dad pushed that.
Before my grandbaby is born, I'm getting the whooping cough vaccine, and any other boosters I may need.
Tetanus. When is the last time you had a tetanus booster? I need mine by next March. Every ten years.
I'm due another, I think. I'll have to see at my next checkup.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
All of this the crazed thinking of liberalism. They want to punish "anti VAXXERS". They have to come up with some moniker for everything they disagree with and call them ANTI or DENIERS or "...ists", etc. And, they want things opposite things to coexist in the world. Now they are all about vaccinations on this hand, but on the other hand, it's a big shrug for undocumented illegals to pore in without any worry about their vaccination status. Or, if certain groups don't want vaccines they shrug. They are demanding $15 or more minimum wage on this hand, but on the other hand, they want to depress wages so illegals can "do the jobs Americans wont' do" for sub par wages. Not one of them can tell me how their polar opposite approaches can coexist in the real world.
All of this the crazed thinking of liberalism. They want to punish "anti VAXXERS". They have to come up with some moniker for everything they disagree with and call them ANTI or DENIERS or "...ists", etc. And, they want things opposite things to coexist in the world. Now they are all about vaccinations on this hand, but on the other hand, it's a big shrug for undocumented illegals to pore in without any worry about their vaccination status. Or, if certain groups don't want vaccines they shrug. They are demanding $15 or more minimum wage on this hand, but on the other hand, they want to depress wages so illegals can "do the jobs Americans wont' do" for sub par wages. Not one of them can tell me how their polar opposite approaches can coexist in the real world.
This isn't a thing. They can do the jobs American't won't do because it gets them jobs. The pay is the same. I've worked in a number of companies who bring over workers on visas. They get the same amount. Show me where this contradictory information is. And from an actual source please. No left/right media bs.
All of this the crazed thinking of liberalism. They want to punish "anti VAXXERS". They have to come up with some moniker for everything they disagree with and call them ANTI or DENIERS or "...ists", etc. And, they want things opposite things to coexist in the world. Now they are all about vaccinations on this hand, but on the other hand, it's a big shrug for undocumented illegals to pore in without any worry about their vaccination status. Or, if certain groups don't want vaccines they shrug. They are demanding $15 or more minimum wage on this hand, but on the other hand, they want to depress wages so illegals can "do the jobs Americans wont' do" for sub par wages. Not one of them can tell me how their polar opposite approaches can coexist in the real world.
This isn't a thing. They can do the jobs American't won't do because it gets them jobs. The pay is the same. I've worked in a number of companies who bring over workers on visas. They get the same amount. Show me where this contradictory information is. And from an actual source please. No left/right media bs.
It is about ILLEGAL immigrants, not people with work visas. And yes, it IS a thing. It is common practice to pay illegal immigrants subpar wages under the table because they can't work legally. So when you require a $15 minimum wage for UNSKILLED labor, day labor is often used instead and they are paid in cash.
Why do you keep making sweeping statements about things you don't really know about, such as "this isn't a thing"? Because it really IS a thing. In fact, it's a really common knowledge "thing".
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
All of this the crazed thinking of liberalism. They want to punish "anti VAXXERS". They have to come up with some moniker for everything they disagree with and call them ANTI or DENIERS or "...ists", etc. And, they want things opposite things to coexist in the world. Now they are all about vaccinations on this hand, but on the other hand, it's a big shrug for undocumented illegals to pore in without any worry about their vaccination status. Or, if certain groups don't want vaccines they shrug. They are demanding $15 or more minimum wage on this hand, but on the other hand, they want to depress wages so illegals can "do the jobs Americans wont' do" for sub par wages. Not one of them can tell me how their polar opposite approaches can coexist in the real world.
This isn't a thing. They can do the jobs American't won't do because it gets them jobs. The pay is the same. I've worked in a number of companies who bring over workers on visas. They get the same amount. Show me where this contradictory information is. And from an actual source please. No left/right media bs.
It is about ILLEGAL immigrants, not people with work visas. And yes, it IS a thing. It is common practice to pay illegal immigrants subpar wages under the table because they can't work legally. So when you require a $15 minimum wage for UNSKILLED labor, day labor is often used instead and they are paid in cash.
Why do you keep making sweeping statements about things you don't really know about, such as "this isn't a thing"? Because it really IS a thing. In fact, it's a really common knowledge "thing".
Common knowledge is, in fact, often incorrect. Which is why I asked the question. The statements are not sweeping. This is a direct response to the ongoing generalization (sweeping?) statements about the topic.
All of this the crazed thinking of liberalism. They want to punish "anti VAXXERS". They have to come up with some moniker for everything they disagree with and call them ANTI or DENIERS or "...ists", etc. And, they want things opposite things to coexist in the world. Now they are all about vaccinations on this hand, but on the other hand, it's a big shrug for undocumented illegals to pore in without any worry about their vaccination status. Or, if certain groups don't want vaccines they shrug. They are demanding $15 or more minimum wage on this hand, but on the other hand, they want to depress wages so illegals can "do the jobs Americans wont' do" for sub par wages. Not one of them can tell me how their polar opposite approaches can coexist in the real world.
This isn't a thing. They can do the jobs American't won't do because it gets them jobs. The pay is the same. I've worked in a number of companies who bring over workers on visas. They get the same amount. Show me where this contradictory information is. And from an actual source please. No left/right media bs.
It is about ILLEGAL immigrants, not people with work visas. And yes, it IS a thing. It is common practice to pay illegal immigrants subpar wages under the table because they can't work legally. So when you require a $15 minimum wage for UNSKILLED labor, day labor is often used instead and they are paid in cash.
Why do you keep making sweeping statements about things you don't really know about, such as "this isn't a thing"? Because it really IS a thing. In fact, it's a really common knowledge "thing".
Common knowledge is, in fact, often incorrect. Which is why I asked the question. The statements are not sweeping. This is a direct response to the ongoing generalization (sweeping?) statements about the topic.
Really, because the illegal immigrants standing outside home depot or on corners to get picked up to do work don't actually exist? Because illegal Hispanic women don't work as nannies and domestics every day? They don't clean houses for cash? Interesting that these people I encounter all the time must be figments of my imagination. They don't walk into my office and and pay cash for trailers and properties? Common knowledge is knowledge based upon daily living with these people in the community. And "This isn't a thing" was YOUR statement and it is so absolutely and completely wrong it shows you have no idea what you are talking about. You have the United States standing between you and the Mexican border, and you have immigration laws that we can only dream of. I have illegal immigrants walk into my office all the time and want to pay CASH to buy houses. Where are they getting that cash? They are not all dealing drugs, most of them are working illegally for it and getting paid cash - which means they often work for less than minimum wage because they are not having to pay any kind of taxes on it, nor is the employer.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
All of this the crazed thinking of liberalism. They want to punish "anti VAXXERS". They have to come up with some moniker for everything they disagree with and call them ANTI or DENIERS or "...ists", etc. And, they want things opposite things to coexist in the world. Now they are all about vaccinations on this hand, but on the other hand, it's a big shrug for undocumented illegals to pore in without any worry about their vaccination status. Or, if certain groups don't want vaccines they shrug. They are demanding $15 or more minimum wage on this hand, but on the other hand, they want to depress wages so illegals can "do the jobs Americans wont' do" for sub par wages. Not one of them can tell me how their polar opposite approaches can coexist in the real world.
This isn't a thing. They can do the jobs American't won't do because it gets them jobs. The pay is the same. I've worked in a number of companies who bring over workers on visas. They get the same amount. Show me where this contradictory information is. And from an actual source please. No left/right media bs.
It is about ILLEGAL immigrants, not people with work visas. And yes, it IS a thing. It is common practice to pay illegal immigrants subpar wages under the table because they can't work legally. So when you require a $15 minimum wage for UNSKILLED labor, day labor is often used instead and they are paid in cash.
Why do you keep making sweeping statements about things you don't really know about, such as "this isn't a thing"? Because it really IS a thing. In fact, it's a really common knowledge "thing".
Common knowledge is, in fact, often incorrect. Which is why I asked the question. The statements are not sweeping. This is a direct response to the ongoing generalization (sweeping?) statements about the topic.
Really, because the illegal immigrants standing outside home depot or on corners to get picked up to do work don't actually exist? Because illegal Hispanic women don't work as nannies and domestics every day? They don't clean houses for cash? Interesting that these people I encounter all the time must be figments of my imagination. They don't walk into my office and and pay cash for trailers and properties? Common knowledge is knowledge based upon daily living with these people in the community. And "This isn't a thing" was YOUR statement and it is so absolutely and completely wrong it shows you have no idea what you are talking about. You have the United States standing between you and the Mexican border, and you have immigration laws that we can only dream of. I have illegal immigrants walk into my office all the time and want to pay CASH to buy houses. Where are they getting that cash? They are not all dealing drugs, most of them are working illegally for it and getting paid cash - which means they often work for less than minimum wage because they are not having to pay any kind of taxes on it, nor is the employer.
Everything LL said is true. It is common knowledge here in the US. In fact I have write into contracts with any work being done on my home that Every worker must be legally compliant to work in this country.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
Rockland County Executive Ed Day says more than 500 immunizations have been administered since Tuesday, when he announced a public ban on unvaccinated minors.
"People simply understand now that we are serious about this," he says.
He believes they are "on the right path" to a 93 percent immunization rate with the first shot.
A New York county's ban on unvaccinated minors in public is working, an official told CNBC on Friday.
Rockland County Executive Ed Day said more than 500 immunizations have been administered since he announced the ban on Tuesday.
"We've gotten their attention," he said in an interview with "The Exchange."
And that was the point. "We're not enforcing it by having people check people and things of that nature. But basically people simply understand now that we are serious about this," said Day.
The county, located in the northern suburbs of New York City, is one of six locations in the U.S. experiencing a measles outbreak, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There have been 157 reported cases in Rockland County since October 2018.
In response, government officials declared a state of emergency on Tuesday and banned unvaccinated children in public places, including shopping malls, schools and restaurants, for 30 days.
"We believe we are on the right path right now to get at least 93 percent immunization rate with the first shot," Day said.
The current rate for those under 18 is 72 percent, he noted. Health officials say the best way to stop the disease's spread is a vaccination rate in the community of 92 to 95 percent.
The vaccine used for measles, called MMR, also protects against mumps and rubella and is administered in two doses. The CDC recommends the first be given at 12 through 15 months of age and the second at 4 through 6 years of age. The combination is 97 percent effective at preventing the disease, while one dose is about 93 percent effective, the CDC's website states.
What's happening in Rockland County is part of a growing anti-immunization trend. Parents, especially in wealthier and more highly educated pockets of the country, are refusing to get their children vaccinated. The Nassau-Suffolk area of New York, which encompasses most of Long Island, has the highest refusal rate: 14.2 percent of parents there declined to give their infants at least one vaccine, according to a January 2018 report from Blue Cross Blue Shield.
"There is way too much of 'all about me' going on. This is a greater good situation," Day said. "Herd immunity is critically important."
— CNBC's Angelica LaVito, Joe Tempestaand AP contributed to this report.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
County bans unvaccinated minors in public as measles spreads
ALBANY, N.Y. | A county in New York City’s northern suburbs declared a state of emergency Tuesday over a measles outbreak that has infected more than 150 people since last fall, hoping a ban against unvaccinated children in public places wakes their parents to the seriousness of the problem.
“It’s an attention grab, there’s no question about it,” Rockland County Executive Ed Day said at a news conference, noting that he didn’t believe such a drastic step has ever been tried in the U.S. before.
Day said he was taking the action in hopes of reversing a recent uptick in cases amid disturbing reports that health workers were encountering resistance when investigating cases. Rockland’s outbreak has most heavily affected Orthodox Jewish communities, in which vaccination rates tend to be lower.
Under the declaration, which lasts for at least 30 days, anyone under 18 who is not vaccinated against measles is barred from public gathering places, including shopping malls, civic centers, schools, restaurants and even houses of worship. Those in violation could be charged with a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail.
But Day acknowledged that there will be no concerted enforcement effort and that the intent is not to arrest people but to emphasize the seriousness of the situation.
“There will not be law enforcement or deputy sheriffs asking for vaccination records. That is ridiculous,” Day said. “However, parents will be held accountable if they’re found to be in violation of this emergency declaration.”
The county is experiencing New York state’s longest measles outbreak since the disease was declared officially eliminated from the United States in 2000. Health officials say the best way to stop the disease’s spread is a vaccination rate in the community of 92 to 95 percent. Day said only 72.9 percent of people under 18 have been vaccinated against measles in Rockland County, which has more than 300,000 residents.
Civil rights attorney Michael Sussman, who represents the parents of 44 unvaccinated children who were barred from a Waldorf School in the county, said he would discuss a possible challenge to the emergency declaration in a meeting with his clients Tuesday night.
“It’s irrational,” Sussman said. “You’re punishing people who don’t have the illness rather than quarantining people who are sick.”
Sussman said a quarantine of measles patients and those close to them would quickly stop the disease’s spread.
This month, a federal judge, citing the “unprecedented measles outbreak,” denied the parents’ request to let unvaccinated children return to the Waldorf School. The lawsuit said the county’s order banning unvaccinated children from schools regardless of religious or medical exemptions violated their constitutional rights.
The outbreak began in the Rockland area when seven unvaccinated travelers diagnosed with measles entered the county last October. There have been 153 cases to date, Day said. In the early days of the outbreak, people were cooperating with health officials and getting children vaccinated, he said, but that has changed.
“Our health inspectors have been hung up on and told not to call again. They’ve been told, ‘We’re not discussing this, do not come back,’ when visiting the homes of infected individuals as part of their investigations,” Day said. “This type of response is unacceptable and frankly irresponsible.”
On the same day as the federal judge’s ruling on the school children, pediatric organizations expressed support for state legislation that would allow minors to get vaccinated without parental consent.
The state legislation’s Democratic sponsors said too many parents believe unsupported claims that vaccines are unsafe and cause autism or other conditions. Day echoed that message, noting celebrities who have spoken out against vaccines.
“If you’re going to People magazine and Jenny McCarthy and Robert De Niro for your medical advice, you need to re-evaluate your life,” he said.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lists six measles outbreaks, defined as three or more cases, around the country in 2019, including Rockland County’s. The CDC said the outbreaks are linked to travelers who brought the disease back from other countries, such as Israel and Ukraine, where large measles outbreaks are occurring.
There have been 181 confirmed cases of measles in Brooklyn and Queens since October, most of them involving members of the Orthodox Jewish community, according to the CDC.
Day said the emergency order was timed with the upcoming religious holidays of Easter and Passover in mind.
“We want people to be able to celebrate,” he said. “We don’t want to see a repeat of how this outbreak started when we saw people gathered together and then fall ill last fall.”
The CDC says 15 states have had at least one case of measles confirmed in 2019, for a total of 314 cases to date. In 2014, 667 cases were confirmed nationwide and there were 372 cases in 2018.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
If others are free to refuse having their bodies injected then i should have that same freedom. I remember the Swine flu vaccine. A lot of people got sick from that. And no i dont want the gardasil vaccine forced on my family. So we are fully vaccinated for mmr, polio, etc but i am not gonna jump on the bandwagon for every new vaccine.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.