TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Alabama abortion law


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Alabama abortion law
Permalink  
 


I like it. 

Thoughts?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think it will pass constitutional muster.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Probably not.

However, it is, along with the other states' laws, making it more possible.

It's one of those things I firmly believe should be up to the state to manage, not the federal law.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Owl drink to that!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4799
Date:
Permalink  
 

I can't see how anyone would NOT like it. If you value life you value life, no matter the circumstance. There should be no picking and choosing.

__________________

Was it a bad day?

Or was it a bad five minutes that you milked all day?



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

This bill is too extreme for Pat Robertson!:


Conservative televangelist Pat Robertson says Alabama abortion law is 'extreme' and he believes the state 'has gone too far'
Noted televangelist Robertson made the remarks Wednesday on The 700 Club
Said that Alabama's law banning abortion in nearly all cases is 'ill-considered'
Robertson supports overturning Roe v Wade but said Alabama went too far
Alabama law has no exceptions for rape or incest and would jail abortionists

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7034699/Conservative-televangelist-Pat-Robertson-says-Alabama-abortion-law-extreme.html



-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Thursday 16th of May 2019 07:40:47 AM

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Roe, as well as the gay marriage case, were bad rulings. The Supreme Court over stepped. It is not their job to create law. It is their job to decide whether an existing law is constitutional. They did not do that in Roe. They spelled out when abortions may be conducted. That's not their job. In Obergefell, they consolidated 4 (I think) cases and, with a broad stroke, changed the definition of marriage rather than limiting their opinion to constitutionality. Both decisions overstepped, in my opinion. But they didn't ask me. LOL

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I do think this law will be overturned because it is so strict.

However, with super strict laws, there is room to amend and it will be seen as a concession.

A law that is too loose is difficult to tighten without a fight.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

In some ways, the hearts and minds of people are changing. With 4d ultrasound and easy internet access to see fetal development, etc, it is very hard to just ignore that reality.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

I do think this law will be overturned because it is so strict.

However, with super strict laws, there is room to amend and it will be seen as a concession.

A law that is too loose is difficult to tighten without a fight.


 And this is the thought process behind it.  It will go to the Supreme Court, which will strike it down as too extreme, but will allow the Court to say reasonable restrictions are Constitutional.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard